Student/teacher conflict regarding animal dissection

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 22-25

  Balcombe, Jonathan ^a  

^a Humane Society of the United States   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0031284962     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4450235     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bennett, J. (1994). New survey shows Colorado students want a choice. Good Medicine, 3(3), 6.
2. Bowd, A.D. (1993). Dissection as an instructional technique in secondary science: Choice and alternatives. Society and Animals, 1(1), 83-88.
3. Dewhurst, D.G., Hardcastle, J., Hardcastle, P.T. & Stuart, E. (1994). Comparison of a computer simulation program and a traditional laboratory practical class for teaching the principles of intestinal absorption. American Journal of Physiology, 267 (Advances in Physiology Education, 12(1), S95-S104).
4. Dewhurst, D.G., Hardcastle, J., Hardcastle, P.T. & Stuart, E. (1994). Comparison of a computer simulation program and a traditional laboratory practical class for teaching the principles of intestinal absorption. American Journal of Physiology, 267 (Advances in Physiology Education, 12(1), S95-S104).
5. Downie, R. & Meadows, J. (1995). Experience with a dissection opt-out scheme in university level biology. Journal of Biological Education, 29(3), 187-194.
6. Francione, G.L. & Charlton, A.E. (1992). Vivisection and dissection in the classroom: A guide to conscientious objection. Jenkintown, PA: The American Anti-Vivisection Society.
7. Greenfield, C.L., Johnson, A.L., Schaeffer, D.J. & Hungerford, L.L. (1995). Comparison of surgical skills of students trained with models or live animals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 206(12), 1840-1845.
8. Hepner, L.A. (1994). Animals in education: The facts, issues and implications. Albuquerque, NM: Richmond Publishers.
9. Jones, N.A., Olafson, R.P. & Sutin, J. (1978). Evaluation of a gross anatomy program without dissection. Journal of Medical Education, 53, 198-205.
10. Keith-Spiegel, P.C., Tabachnick, B.G. & Allen, M. (1993). Ethics and academia: Students' views of professors' actions. Ethics & Behavior, 3(2), 149-162.
11. Kline, A.D. (1995). We should allow dissection of animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 8(2), 190-197.
12. Lord, T. & Moses, R. (1994). College students' opinions about animal dissections. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 267-270.
13. Millett, K. & Lock, R. (1992). GCSE students' attitudes towards animal use: Some implications for biology/science teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 26(3), 204-208.
14. Nichols, J.R. (1995). Values and biology education. The American Biology Teacher, 57(5), 268-271.
15. Offner, S. (1995). Cut here. The Executive Educator, 17, 40.
16. Orlans, F.B. (1995). Investigator competency and animal experiments: Guidelines for elementary and secondary education. Lab Animal, 24(9), 29-34.
17. Orlans, F.B. (1993). In the name of science: Issues in responsible animal experimentation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18. Rowan, A.N. & Weer, J.C. (Eds.) (1993). Biology education and animals: Opportunities and issues (summary proceedings). Tufts Center for Animals and Public Policy, North Grafton, MA.
19. Samsel, R.W., Schmidt, G.A., Hall, J.B., Wood, L.D.H., Shroff, S.G. & Schumacker, P.T. (1994). Cardiovascular physiology teaching: Computer simulations vs. animal demonstrations. Advances in Physiology Education, 11, S36-S46.
20. Sapontzis, S.F. (1995). We should not allow dissection of animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 8(2), 181-189.
21. Schrock, J.R. (1990). Dissection. The Kansas School Naturalist, 36(3), 3-16.
22. Shapiro, K.J. (1988). Alternatives in education: A philosophical and pedagogical reflection. International Foundation for Ethical Research Newsletter, 2, 3.
23. Smith, A.J. & Smith, K. (1996). The NORINA Database of Audiovisual Alternatives. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine.
24. The Humane Society of the United States Youth Education Division. (1995). Alternatives to Dissection (activities packet). Washington, DC: The HSUS.