Stroke: Promising neurorehabilitation interventions and steps toward testing them

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 82, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Good, David C ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Randomized Clinical Trials; Rehabilitation Research; Stroke Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

NEURAL NETWORKS; NEUROLOGY; PATIENT TREATMENT;

STROKE REHABILITATION;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KINESIOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; ROBOTICS; SAMPLE SIZE; STROKE; TREADMILL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0141457990     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000086993.06450.c0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (67)

1. Broderick J, Brott T, Kothari R, et al: The greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky stroke study: Preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. Stroke 1998;29:415-21
2. Williams GR, Jiang JG, Matchar DB, et al: Incidence and occurrence of total (first-ever and recurrent stroke). Stroke 1999;30:2523-8
3. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. Rockville, MD, US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Publications, 95-0662, 1995
4. Keith RA: Treatment strength in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78:1298-304
5. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al: Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-54
6. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al: Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke 1999;30:586-92
7. Tangeman PT, Banaitis DA, Williams AK: Rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients: Changes in functional performance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71: 876-80
8. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, et al: Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 1992;23:1084-9
9. Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kase CS, et al: Time course of functional recovery after stroke: The Framingham study. J Neurol Rehabil 1989;3:65-70
10. Kelly-Hayes M: Time intervals, survival, and destination: Three crucial variables in stroke outcome research. Stroke 1990; 21(suppl II):II-24-II-26
11. Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Hewer RL, et al: Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46:5-8
12. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al: Functional and neurological outcome of stroke and the relation to stroke severity and type, stroke unit treatment, body temperature, age, and other risk factors: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2000;6: 1-19
13. Mayo NE, Korner-Bitensky NA, Becker R: Recovery time of independent function post-stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991;70:5-12
14. Jongbloed L: Prediction of function after stroke: A critical review. Stroke 1986;17:765-76
15. Reding MJ, Potes E: Rehabilitation outcomes following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Stroke 1988;19:1354-8
16. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC: Discharge outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1992;23:978-82
17. Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Hewer RL: Predicting Barthel ADL score at six months after an acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:24-8
18. Bohannon RW, Lee N, Maljanian R: Postadmission function best predicts acute hospital outcomes after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:726-30
19. Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Wood VA, et al: Stroke: The influence of age upon outcome. Age Aging 1984;13:357-62
20. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz R: Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1887-92
21. Algra A, van Gijn J: Aspirin at any dose above 30 mg offers only modest protection after cerebral ischemia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;60:197-9
22. Hacke W, Brott T, Caplan L, et al: Thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: Controlled trials and clinical experience. Neurology 1999;53(suppl 4):S3-S14
23. Whyte J: Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Are there alternatives to randomized clinical trials? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1320-2
24. Benson K, Hartz AJ: A comparison of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2000;342: 1878-86
25. Wolf SL, LeCraw DI, Barton LA, et al: Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned non-use among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989; 104:125-32
26. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, et al: Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999;30:2369-75
27. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M: Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 2000;32: 2984-8
28. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, et al: A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000;54:1938-44
29. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Ferraro M, et al: Robot-aided neurorehabilitation from evidence-based to science-based rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002;8:54-70
30. Lum P, Reinkensmeyer D, Mahoney R, et al: Robotic devices for movement therapy after stroke: Current status and challenges to clinical acceptance. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002;8:40-53
31. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke MT, et al: Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke 1995;26:976-81
32. Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N, et al: A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 1998;29:1122-8
33. Hesse S: Treadmill training with body weight support in hemiparetic patients: Further research needed. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1999;13:179-81
34. Davies PM: Weight-supported treadmill training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1999;13:167-169
35. Sullivan KJ, Knowlton BJ, Dobkin BH: Step training with body weight support: Effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:683-91
36. Mudie MH, Matyas TA: Responses of the densely hemiplegic upper extremity to bilateral training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2001;15:129-40
37. Mudie MH, Matyas TA: Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural damaged by stroke? Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:23-37
38. Ridding MC, Brouwer B, Miles TS, et al: Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. Exp Brain Res 2000;131:135-43
39. Ridding MC, McKay DR, Thompson PD, et al: Changes in corticomotor representations induced by prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:1461-9
40. Sisto SA, Forrest GF, Glendinning D: Virtual reality applications for motor rehabilitation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002;8:11-23
41. Jack D, Boian R, Merians AS, et al: Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2001;9: 308-18
42. Feeney DM, Gonzales A, Law WA: Amphetamine, haloperidol and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. Science 1982; 217:855-7
43. Goldstein LB, Davis JN: Post-lesion practice and amphetamine facilitated recovery of beam-walking in the rat. Restorative Neurol Neurosci 1990;1:311-4
44. Crisostomo EA, Duncan PW, Probst MA, et al: Evidence that amphetamine with physical therapy promotes recovery of motor function in stroke patients. Ann Neurol 1988;23:94-7
45. Walker-Batson D, Smith P, Curtis S, et al: Amphetamine paired with physical therapy accelerates motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 1995;26:2254-9
46. Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Müller F, et al: Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Lancet 2001; 358:787-90
47. Grade C, Redford B, Chrostowski J, et al: Methylphenidate in early poststroke recovery: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1047-50
48. Lauer RT, Peckham PH, Kilgore KL: EEG-based control of a hand grasp neuroprosthesis. Neuroreport 1999;10: 1767-71
49. Wolpaw JR, McFarland DJ, Vaughn TM: Brain-computer interface research at the Wadsworth Center. TEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000;8:222-226
50. Issacs RE, Weber DJ, Schwartz AB: Work toward real-time control of a cortical neural prothesis. TEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000;8:196-8
51. Wolpaw JR., Birbaumer N, Heetderks WJ, et al: Brain-computer interface technology: A review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000;8:164-73
52. Savitz SI, Rosenbaum DM, Dinsmore JH, et al: Cell transplantation for stroke. Ann Neurol 2002;52:266-75
53. Cramer SC, Bastings EP: Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke. Neuropharmacology 2000;39:842-51
54. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, et al: A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 1997;28:2518-27
55. Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, et al: Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250: 5-8
56. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, et al: Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000;31:1210-6
57. Liepert J, Graef S, Uhde I, et al: Training-induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2000;101:321-6
58. Bastings EP, Greenberg JP, Good DC: Hand motor recovery after stroke: A transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping study of motor output areas and their relation to functional status. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:275-82
59. Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Bassi A, et al: Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke: A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke 1997;28:110-7
60. Chollet F, Dipiero V, Wise RJ, et al: The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 1991;29:63-71
61. Cao Y, D'Olhaberriague L, Vikingstad EM, et al: Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation of motor function after post stroke hemiparesis. Stroke 1998;29:112-22
62. Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, et al: Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 2000;31:656-61
63. Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, et al: Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: Recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 2002; 33:1610-7
64. Wittenberg GF, Bastings EP, Scales C, et al: Evolution of transcranial magnetic stimulation motor maps during recovery after stroke. NeuroImage 2001;13: S5853
65. Greenberg JP, Williams CB, Wittenberg GF, et al: Serial functional magnetic resonance imaging of upper extremity motor function after stroke. Neurology 2002;58(suppl 3):A30
66. Butefisch CM, Davis BC, Sawaki L, et al: Modulation of use-independent plasticity by d-amphetamine. Ann Neurol 2002;51:59-68
67. Sawaki L, Cohen LG, Classen J, et al: Enhancement of use-dependent plasticity by d-amphetamine. Neurology 2002;59: 1262