Examining teacher instructional leadership within the small group dynamics of collegial groups

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 785-799

  Keedy, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Effective schools; Principal support; Professional development; School reform; Teacher collegiality; Teacher leadership

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043284375     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00022-0     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alexander L. Time for results. An overview Phi Delta Kappan. 68:1986;202-204.
2. Bacharach S.B., Conley S.C. Education reform. A managerial agenda Phi Delta Kappan. 67:1986;641-645.
3. Blase J.J. Some negative effects of principal's control-oriented and protective political behavior. American Educational Research Journal. 27:1990;727-753.
4. Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism. 1969;Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Board of Education of Boone County v. Joan Bushee et al., 889 Ky S. W. 2nd 809 (1994).
6. Brewer D.J. Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S. high schools. Economics of Education Review. 12:1993;281-292.
7. Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, Task Force on Teaching as a Profession (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York: Author.
8. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). State policy and classroom performance: Mathematics reform in California (CPRE Policy Briefs). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
9. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Connelly F.M., Clandinin D.J., He M.F. Teachers' personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teaching Education. 13:1997;665-674.
11. Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on the validity argument. In H. Wainer & H. I. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 3-18) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Crowther F., Olsen P. Teachers as leaders - an exploratory framework. International Journal of Educational Management. 11(1):1997;6-13.
13. Cuban, L. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14. Fullan, M. G. (1982). The meaning of educational change. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
15. Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
17. Glasser W. The quality school. Phi Delta Kappan. 71:1990;424-435.
18. Hart A.W. Impacts of the school social unit on teacher authority during work redesign. American Educational Research Journal. 27:1990;503-532.
19. Holmes Group (1986). Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, MI: Author.
20. Hunter, F. (1953). Community power structure. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
21. Jackson, P. W., Boostrom, R. E., & Hansen, D. T. (1998). The moral life of schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Keedy J.L. The school sites and national coalitions. The twin engines for genuine school reform Journal of School Leadership. 4:1994;94-111.
23. Keedy J.L., Achilles C.M. The need for school-constructed theories in practice in U.S. school restructuring. Journal of Educational Administration. 35:1997;102-121.
24. Keedy J.L., Rogers K. Teacher collegial groups. Promoting professional dialogue conducive for organization change Journal of School Leadership. 1:1991;65-73.
25. Keedy J.L., Robbins D. Workplace culture and the collegial role of department chairs. A case for teacher collegial groups The Clearing House. 66:1993;185-188.
26. Little J.W. Norms of collegiality and experimentation. Workplace conditions of school success American Educational Research Journal. 19:1982;325-340.
27. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Maccoby, M. (1989, December). Looking for leadership now. Paper presented at the National Center for Educational Leadership Conference, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
30. Macpherson R.J.S. Educative accountability policy research. Methodology and epistemology Educational Administrative Quarterly. 32:1996;80-106.
31. Marshall C. Appropriate criteria of trustworthiness and goodness for qualitative research on education organizations. Quality and Quantity. 19:1985;353-373.
32. McDonald, J. P. (1998). Redesigning school. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. McNeil L.J. Contradictions of control, Part 2. Teachers, students, and curriculum Phi Delta Kappan. 69:1988;432-438.
34. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Meier, D. (1997). The power of their ideas. New York: Farrah, Strauss, and Giroux.
36. National Governors' Association (1986). Time for results. Washington, DC: Author.
37. Ogawa R.T., Bossert S.T. Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly. 31:1995;203-223.
38. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
39. Paquette M. Voluntary collegial support groups for teachers. Educational Leadership. 45(3):1987;36-39.
40. Schmoker, M. J. (1996). Results: The key to continuous improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
41. Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (1998). Supervision: A redefinition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Sizer, T. R. (1996). The crafting of America's schools: The power of localism. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company.
43. Smylie M.A., Denny J.W. Teacher leadership. Tensions and ambiguities in organizational perspective Educational Administrative Quarterly. 26:1990;235-259.
44. Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York: Wiley.
45. Wasley, P. A. (1991). Teachers who lead: The rhetoric of reform and the realities of practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
46. Winter, P. A., Newton, R. M., & Kirkpatrick, R. L. (1999). The influence of work values on teacher selection decisions: The effects of principal values, teacher values, and principal-teacher value interactions. Teaching and Teacher Education.
47. Wise A. The two conflicting trends in school reform. Legislated learning revisited Phi Delta Kappan. 69:1988;328-333.
48. Zeichner K. Connecting genuine teacher development to the struggle for social justice. Journal of Education for Teaching. 19(1):1993;5-20.