Educative Accountability Policy Research: Methodology and Epistemology

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 80-106

  Macpherson, R J S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038950347     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X96032001004     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bates, R. J. (1980). Perspective: Educational administration, the sociology of science and the management of knowledge. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(2), 1-20.
2. Bates, R. J. (1982). Toward a critical practice of educational administration. Studies in Educational Administration, 27, 1-15.
3. Bates, R. J. (1983). Educational administration and the management of knowledge. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
4. Bates, R. J. (1988, April). Is there a new paradigm in educational administration? Paper given to the Special Interest Group on Organization Theory, American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
5. Bates, R. J. (1990, April). Leadership and the rationalization of society. Paper given to the Special Interest Group on Organization Theory, American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
6. Boyd, W. L, & Halpin, D. (1994, October). National "systemic" school reform: Lessons from the British experience. Introduction to a conference sponsored by the AERA Politics of Education Association, School District of Philadelphia and Temple University's School of Education, Temple University.
7. Caldwell, & Spinks, J. (1988). The self-managing school. Lewes, England: Falmer Press.
8. Cibulka, J. G. (1991). Educational accountability reforms: Performance information and political power. In S. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 181-201). London: Falmer Press.
9. Cusack, B. O. (1993). Political engagement in the restructured school: The New Zealand experience. Educational Management and Administration, 21(2), 107-114.
10. Duignan, P. A., & Macpherson, R.J.S. (Eds.). (1992). Educative leadership: A practical theory for new administrators and managers. Basingstoke, England: Falmer Press.
11. Duignan, P. A., & Macpherson, R.J.S. (1993). Educative leadership: A practical theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(1), 8-33.
12. Elmore, R. F., & Associates (1990). Restructuring schools: The next generation of educational reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Evers, C. W. (1979). Analytic philosophy of education: From a logical point of view. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 11(2), 1-16.
14. Evers, C. W. (1984). Epistemology and justification: From classical foundationalism to Quinean coherentism and materialist pragmatism. In C. W. Evers & J. C. Walker (Eds.), Epistemology, semantics, and educational theory. Sydney, Australia: Department of Education, University of Sydney.
15. Evers, C. W. (1987). Philosophical research in educational administration. In R.J.S. Macpherson (Ed.), Ways and meanings of research in educational administration (pp. 53-78). Armidale, Australia: University of New England Press.
16. Evers, C. W. (1988). Educational administration and the new philosophy of science. Journal of Educational Administration, 26(1), 3-22.
17. Evers, C. W., in association with Dillon, D., Duignan, P.A., Long, M., Macpherson, R.J.S., Norman, M., & Williams, J. (1987). Ethics and ethical theory in educative leadership - A pragmatic and holistic approach. In C. W. Evers (Ed.), Moral theory for educative leadership (pp. 3-30). Melbourne, Australia: Ministry of Education.
18. Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (1991). Knowing educational administration: Contemporary methodological controversies in educational administration research. Oxford: Pergamon.
19. Foster, W. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
20. Greenfield, T. (1988). The decline and fall of science in educational administration. In D. E. Griffiths, R. T. Stout, &P. B. Forsyth (Eds.), Leaders for America's schools: The report and papers of the National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
21. Greenfield, T. B. (1975). Theory about organizations: Anew perspective and its implications for schools. In M. G. Hughes (Ed.), Administering education. London: Althone.
22. Griffith, J. E. (1990). Indicators and accountability in the USA. In T. J. Wyatt & A. Ruby (Eds.), Education indicators for quality, accountability and better practice: Papers from the [Second] National Conference on Indicators and Quality in Education (pp. 1-13). Sydney: Australian Conference of Directors-General of Education.
23. Guthrie, J. W. (1989, September). The evolving political economy of education and the implications of educational evaluation. Paper given to the British Educational Management and Administration Society, Leicester University.
24. Guthrie, J. W., Hayward, G. C., Kirst, M. W., & Odden, A. R. (1988). Conditions of education in California 1988. Berkeley, CA: Policy Analysis for California Education, University of California.
25. Hesse, M. (1974). The structure of scientific inference. London: Macmillan.
26. Hesse, M. (1980). Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. London: Harvester.
27. House, E. R. (1972, November). The domain of economic accountability. Educational Forum, 37. (1), 13-23.
28. Kaagen, S. S, & Coley, R. (1989). State education indicators: Measured strides and missing steps. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Policy Research in Education, Rutgers University.
29. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Lakomski, G. (1987). The cultural perspective in educational administration. In R.J.S. Macpherson (Ed.), Ways and meanings of research in educational administration (pp. 115-138). Armidale Australia: University of New England Press.
31. Macpherson, R.J.S. (1991a). The restructuring of administrative policies in Australia and New Zealand state school education systems: Implications for practice, theory and research. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(4), 51-64.
32. Macpherson, R.J.S. (1991b). The politics of Australian curriculum: The third coming of a national curriculum agency in a neo-pluralist state. In S. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 203-218). Basingstoke: Falmer Press.
33. Macpherson, R.J.S. (1992a). History, organization and power: A preliminary analysis of educational management in Tasmania. School Organization, 12(3), 269-288.
34. Macpherson, R.J.S. (1992b). Educative leadership and the co-option of corporate managerialism and oligarchic politics. In T. Simpkins, L. Ellison, & V. Garrett (Eds.), Implementing educational reform: The early lessons. Essex, England: Longman.
35. Macpherson, R.J.S. (1993). Administrative reforms in the Antipodes: Self-managing schools and the need for educative leaders. Educational Management and Administration, 21(1), 40-52.
36. McDonnell, L. M. (1989). The policy context In R. J. Shavelson, L. M. McDonnell, & J. Oakes (Eds.), Indicators for monitoring mathematics and science education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
37. Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors and puzzle-solving in organizational theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 605-622.
38. National Center for Education Statistics. (1989). Condition of education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
39. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
40. Oakes, J. (1986). Educational indicators: A guide for policy makers. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Policy Research in Education, Rutgers University.
41. Odden, A. (1990). Making sense of education indicators: The missing ingredient. In T. J. Wyatt & A. Ruby (Eds.), Education indicators for quality, accountability and better practice: Papers from the [Second] National Conference on Indicators and Quality in Education (pp. 33-57). Sydney: Australian Conference of Directors-General of Education.
42. Pipho, C. (1989, May). Stateline. Phi Delta Kappan Way, 70(9), 662-663.
43. Quine, W.V.O., (1960). Word and object Boston: MIT and New York: Wiley.
44. Quine, W.V.O., & Ullian, J. S. (1978). The web of belief (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
45. Robinson, V. M. (1994). The promise of critical research in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(1), 56-76.
46. Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L. M., & Oakes, J. (1989). Indicators for monitoring mathematics and science education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
47. Smith, M. S. (1988, March). Educational indicators. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(7), 487-491.
48. Soltis, J. F. (1984). On the nature of educational research. Educational Researcher, 13(10), 5-10.
49. Walker, J. C., in association with Duignan, P. A., Flynn, P., Francis, D., Ikin, R., Macpherson, R.J.S., Maxwell, B., & Wade, B. (1987). Aphilosophy of leadership in curriculum development: A pragmatic and holistic approach. In J. C. Walker (Ed.), Educative leadership and curriculum development. Canberra, Australia: ACT Schools Authority.
50. Walker, J. C., & Evers, C. W. (1982). Epistemology and justifying the curriculum of educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 30(2), 312-319.
51. Walker, J. C., & Evers, C. W. (1984). Towards a materialist pragmatist philosophy of education. Education Research and Perspectives, 11(1), 23-33.
52. Willower, D. J. (1988). Synthesis and projection. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp. 729-747). New York: Longman.
53. Wohlstetter, P., & Odden, A. (1992). Rethinking school-based management policy and research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(4), 529-549.