Growing smart by linking transportation and land use: Perspectives from California

Built Environment

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 66-78

  Cervero, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOUSING POLICY; LAND USE PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0043011174     PISSN: 02637960     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2148/benv.29.1.66.53948     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. American Farmland Trust (1997) Farming on the Edge: II. Dekalb: Northern Illinois University Press.
2. Barbour, E. and Teitz, M. (2001) A Framework for Collaborative Regional Decision Making. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
3. Batty, M. and Longley, A. (1994) Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function. London: Academic Press.
4. Bernick, M. and Cervero, R. (1997) Transit Villages in the 21st Century. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Boarnet, M. (1997) Highways and economic productivity: Interpreting recent evidence. Journal of Planning Literature, 11(4), pp. 476-486.
6. California Building Industry Association (2001) Where Will They Live? Sacramento.
7. California Department of Transportation (2001) Global Gateways Development Program. Sacramento.
8. Cervero, R. (1996) Jobs-housing balance revisited. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), pp. 15-42.
9. Cervero, R. (1998) The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry. Washington, DC: Island Press.
10. Cervero, R. (2001a) Efficient urbanization: economic performance and the shape of the metropolis. Urban Studies, 38(10), pp. 1651-1671.
11. Cervero, R. (2001b) Transport and land use. Australian Planner, 38(1), pp. 29-37.
12. Cervero, R. (2002) Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework. Transportation Research D, 7, pp. 265-284
13. Cervero, R. and Bernick, M. (1996) High-Speed Rail and Development of California's Central Valley: Comparative Lessons and Public Policy Considerations. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development Working Paper 675.
14. Cervero, R. and Duncan, M. (2001) Transit's Value-Added: Effects of Light and Commuter Rail Services on Commercial Land Values. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
15. Cervero, R. and Kockleman, K. (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Trans-portation Research D, 2(3), pp. 53-62.
16. Cervero, R. and Radisch, K. (1996) Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighbourhoods. Transport Policy, 3(3), pp. 127-141.
17. Cervero, R. and Wu, K. (1997) Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay. Environment and Planning A, 29, pp. 865-886.
18. Cervero, R. and Wu, K. (1998) Subcentring and commuting: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Urban Studies, 35(7), pp. 1059-1076.
19. Ewing, R., Haliyur, P. and Page, G. (1994) Getting around a traditional city, a suburban PUD, and everything in-between. Transportation Research Record, No. 1466, pp. 53-62.
20. Fulton, W. (1999) Guide to California Planning. Point Arena, CA: Solano Press.
21. Gordon, P. and Richardson, H. (1997) Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), pp. 107-126.
22. Guiliano, G. and Small, K. (1993) Is the journey to work explained by urban structure? Urban Studies, 20, pp. 1485-1500.
23. Hirano, S. (2002) Hot projects in transit-oriented development. Metro Magazine, February/March, pp. 26-28.
24. Holtzclaw, J. (1994) Using Residential Patterns and Transit to Decrease Auto Dependence and Costs. San Francisco: National Resources Defense Council.
25. Holtzclaw, J., Clear, R., Dittmar, H., Goldstein, D. and Haas, P. (2002) Location efficiency: neighborhood and socio-economic characteristics determine auto ownership and use - Studies in Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. Transportation Planning and Technology, 25, pp. 1-27.
26. Katz, L. and Rosen, K. (1987) The intergenerational effects of growth controls on housing prices. Journal of Law and Economics, 30, pp. 149-160.
27. Kenworthy, J. and Laube, F. (1999) An International Sourcebook of Automobile Dependence in Cities: 1960-1990. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
28. Landis, J. (2000) Growth as Density: Understanding California's Postwar Growth Patterns and Trends. Metropolitan Development Patterns: 2000 Annual Roundtable, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 30-39.
29. Landis, J., Pendall, R., Olshansky, R., and Huang, W. (1995) Fixing CEQA: Options and Opportunities for Reforming the California Environmental Quality Act. Berkeley: University of California, California Policy Seminar.
30. Landis, J., Smith-Heimer, M., Larice, M., Reilly, M., Corley, M. and Jerchow, O. (2000) Raising the Roof: California Housing Development Projections and Constraints, 1997-2020. Sacramento: California Department of Housing and Community Affairs.
31. Legislative Analysts Office, State of California (2000) California Travels: Financing Our Transportation System. Sacramento: California State Legislature.
32. Levine, N., Glickfield, M. and Fulton, W. (1993) Home Rule: Local Growth and Regional Consequences. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
33. Myer, D. (2000) Building the Future as a Process of Time. Metropolitan Development Patterns: 2000 Annual Roundtable, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 62-65.
34. Nelson, A. and Peterman, D. (2000) Does growth management matter? The effect of growth management on economic performance. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, pp. 277-285.
35. Orfield, M. (1997) Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for Community and Stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
36. Sedway Kotin Mouchly Group (1996) Joint Development Entrepreneurial Study. Oakland: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District.
37. Shank, D. and Lomax, T. (2000) 1999 Annual Mobility Report. College Park, Texas: Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University.
38. Small, K. (2000) Urban Sprawl: A Non-Diagnosis of Real Problems. Metropolitan Development Patterns: 2000 Annual Roundtable. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 26-29.
39. Surface Transportation Policy Project (2000) Beyond Gridlock: Meeting California's Transportation Needs in the Twenty-First Century. San Francisco: Surface Transportation Policy Project.
40. Wachter, S. (2000) Cities and Regions: Findings from the 1999 State of the Cities Report. Metropolitan Development patterns: 2000 Annual Roundtable. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 20-25.