Transport and land use: Key issues in metropolitan planning and smart growth

Australian Planner

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 29-37

  Cervero, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12444334181     PISSN: 07293682     EISSN: 21506841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07293682.2001.9657929     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Beatley, T. 2000. Green Urbanism: Learning from European Cities Washington, DC: Island Press.
2. Brindle, R. 1996. “ ‘Transport and Urban Form: The Not-So-Vital Link?’ presented to the ITS District 8/ITE Australia Sectional 13 Inaugural Regional Conference. ”. In Transport & Livable Cities Melbourne http://www.arrb.org.au/oapers/Rayb7.htm
3. Burchell, R. 2000. “ ‘The State of Cities and Sprawl’ ”. In Bridging the Divide Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
4. Cervero, R, and Bosselmann, P. 1998. ‘An Evaluation of the Market Potential for Transit-Oriented Developing Using visual Simulation Techniques’. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 15 (3): 181–196.
5. Cervero, R, and Landis, J. 1996. ‘Twenty Years of BART Land Use and Development Impacts’. Transportation Research, 31 (44): 309–333.
6. Cervero, R. 1989. America's Suburban Centers: The Land use-Transportation Link Boston: Unwin-Hyman.
7. Cervero, R. 1995. ‘Planned Communities, Self-Containment and Commuting: A cross-national Perspective’. Urban Studies, 32 (7): 1115–1162.
8. Cervero, R. 1998. The Transit Metropolis Washington, DC: Island Press.
9. Cervero, R. 2000. Efficient Urbanization: Economic Performance and the Shape of the Metropolis Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Working Paper, Cambridge, Massachusetts
10. Downs, A. 1994. New Visions for Metropolitan America Washington, D.C., The Brookings Institution
11. Ewing, R. 1997. ‘Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable?’. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63 (1): 107–126.
12. Goodwin, P. 1996. “ ‘Empirical Evidence of Induced Traffic: A Review and Synthesis’ ”. In Transportation 35–34. 23
13. Guiliano, G. 1995. “ ‘The Weakening Transportation-Land Use Connection’ ”. In Access 2–10. 6
14. Hall, P. 1995. “ ‘A European Perspective on the Spatial Links between Land Use, Development and Transport’ ”. In Transport and Urban Development. Edited by: Banister, D. London: E & FN Spon.
15. Hansen, M, and Huang, Y. 1997. “ ‘Road Supply and Traffic in California Urban Areas’ ”. In Transportation Research A 205–218. 31
16. Henderson, D, and Mokhtarian, P. 1996. ‘Impacts of Center-Based Telecommuting on Travel and Emissions: Analysis of the Puget Sound Demonstration Project’. Transportation Research D, 1 (1): 29–45.
17. Howard, E. 1898. To-morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform London: Swan Sonnenschein.
18. Ingram, G, and Liu, Z. 1999. “ ‘Determinants of Motorization and Road Provision’ ”. In Essays in Transportation Economics and Policy Edited by: Gomez-Ibanez, J, Tye, W, and Winston, C. 325–356. Brookings Institute, Washington, DC
19. Kenworthy, J, and Laude, L. 1999. An International Sourcebook of Automobile Dependence in Cities, 1960–1990 Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
20. Koenig, B, Henderson, D, and Mokhtarian, P. 1996. “ ‘Travel and Emission Impacts of Telecommuting for the State of California Telecommuting Pilot Project’ ”. In Transportation Research C 13–32. 4
21. Major, M. 1997. ‘Brazil's Busways: A Subway That Runs Above Ground’. Mass Transit, 23 (3): 26–34.
22. Meyer, B. 2000. “ ‘The Shape of Sydney: 1801 to 2001’ ”. In Sustainable Transport in Sustainable Cities: A Series of Projects The Warren Centre for Advanced Engineering, The University of Sydney, May: 42
23. Mokhtarian, P. 1991. “ ‘Defining Telecommuting’ ”. In Transportation Research Record 273–281. 1305
24. 2000. “ ‘Does Growth Management Matter? The Effect of Growth Management on Economic Performance’ ”. In Journal of Planning Education and Research Vol. 19, 277–285. Nelson A & Peterman D
25. Newman, P, and Kenworthy, J. 1989. Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook Brookfield, Vermont: Gower.
26. Newman, P. 1996. ‘Reducing Automobile Dependence’. Environment and Urbanization, 8 (1): 67–92.
27. Shen, Q. 1997. ‘Urban Transportation in Shanghai, China: Problems and Planning Implications’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 21 (4): 589–406.
28. Shoup, D. 1999. The Trouble with Minimum Parking Requirements. Transportation Research A—Policy and Practice, 33 (7–8): 549–547.
29. Small, K. 2000. “ ‘Urban Sprawl: A Non-Diagnosis of Real Problems’ ”. In Metropolitan Development Patterns 26–29. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Annual Roundtable 2000
30. 1995. Travel Demand Management Programs: Review of International Experiences Auckland: Auckland Regional Council. Travers Morgan, Ltd
31. Verroen, E, and Jansen, G. 1992. “ ‘Location Planning for Companies and Public Facilities’ ”. In Transportation Research Record 1364
32. Wachs, M. 1995. “ ‘Will Congestion Pricing Ever Be Adopted’ ”. In Access 15–19. 4
33. Willson, R. 1995. ‘Suburban Parking Requirements: A Tacit Policy for Automobile Use and Sprawl’. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61 (1): 29–42.
34. Zegras, C. 1998. ‘Clearing the Skies in Santiago’. Habitat Debate, 4 (2) 23