Functionalized biomicroelectromechanical systems sensors for force response study at local adhesion sites of single living cells on substrates

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 31, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 950-961

  Saif, M Taher A ^a   Sager, Chad Randall ^a   Coyer, Sean ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Buckling; Cytoskeleton; Endothelial cell; Fibroblast cell; Fibromectin; MEMS; Microcantilever; Truss

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; BIOCHEMISTRY; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; DEFORMATION; FORCE MEASUREMENT; LIVING SYSTEMS STUDIES; MICROELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; ONCOLOGY;

CYTOSKELETON; ENDOTHELIAL CELL; FIBROBLAST CELL; FIBRONECTIN; FORCE RESPONSE; FUNCTIONALIZED; FUNCTIONALIZED BIOMICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEM SENSORS; SINGLE LIVING CELLS;

BIOSENSORS;

BIOMATERIAL; FIBRONECTIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; ELECTRONICS; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; FIBROBLAST; GENETIC PROCEDURES; INSTRUMENTATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; METHODOLOGY; MICROMANIPULATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STIMULATION; SYNTHESIS; TRANSDUCER; VALIDATION STUDY; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIUM;

ANIMALS; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; CATTLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELLS, CULTURED; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; ELECTRONICS; ENDOTHELIUM, VASCULAR; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FIBROBLASTS; FIBRONECTINS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MICROMANIPULATION; MINIATURIZATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; RATS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 0042377561     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1114/1.1591189     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Block, S. Making light work with optical tweezers. Nature (London) 360:493-495, 1992.
2. Bowen, W. R., N. Hilal, R. W. Lovitt, and C. J. Wright. Direct measurement of the force of adhesion of a single biological cell using an atomic force microscope. Colloids Surf., A 136:231-234, 1998.
3. Breen, E. C. Mechanical strain increases type 1 collagen expression in pulmonary fibroblasts in vitro. J. Appl. Physiol. 88:203-209, 2000.
4. Chen, C. S., M. Mrksich, S. Huang, G. M. Whitesides, and D. E. Ingber. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 276:1425-1428, 1997.
5. Chen, K.-D., Y.-S. Li, M. Kim, S. Li, S. Yuan, S. Chien, and J. Y.-J. Shyy. Mechanotransduction in response to shear stress. J. Biol. Chem. 274:18393-18400, 1999.
6. Chesla, S. E., P. Selvaraj, and C. Zhu. Measuring two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding kinetics by micropipette. Biophys. J. 75:1553-1572, 1998.
7. Chicurel, M. E., C. S. Chen, and D. E. Ingber. Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10:232-239, 1998.
8. Clough, R. W., and J. Penzien. Dynamics of Structures. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986, pp 137.
9. Crouch, C. J., H. W. Fowler, and R. E. Spier. The adhesion of animal cells to surfaces: The measurement of critical surface shear stress permitting attachment or causing detachment. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 35B:273-281, 1985.
10. Easty, G. C., D. M. Easty, and E. J. Ambrose. Studies of cellular adhesiveness. Exp. Cell Res. 19:539-548, 1960.
11. Evans, E., D. Berk, and A. Leung. Detachment of agglutinin-bonded red blood cells, I. Forces to rupture molecular-point attachments. Biophys. J. 59:838-848, 1991.
12. Evans, E., D. Berk, A. Leung, and N. Mohandas. Detachment of agglutinin-bonded red blood cells, II. Mechanical energies to separate large contact areas. Biophys. J. 59:849-860, 1991.
13. Florin, E.-L., V. T. Moy, and H. E. Gaub. Adhesion forces between individual ligand-receptor pairs. Science 264:415-417, 1994.
14. Forrester, J. V., and J. M. Lackie. Adhesion of neutrophil leucocytes under conditions of flow. J. Cell. Sci. 70:93-110, 1984.
15. Heidemann, S. R., S. Kaech, R. E. Buxbaum, and A. Matus. Direct observations of the mechanical behaviors of the cytoskeleton in living fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 145:109-122, 1999.
16. Helm, C. A., W. Knoll, and J. N. Israelachvili. Measurement of ligand-receptor interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88:8169-8173, 1991.
17. Horwitz, A. F. Integrins and health. Sci. Am. 276:68-75, 1997.
18. Hwang, W. C., and R. E. Waugh. Energy of dissociation of lipid bilayer from the membrane skeleton of red blood cells. Biophys. J. 72:2669-2678, 1997.
19. Ingber, D. How cells (might) sense microgravity. FASEB J. 13:S3-S15, 1999.
20. Ingber, D. E. The architecture of life. Sci. Am. 278(1):30-39, 1998.
21. Kaech, S., B. Ludin, and A. Matus. Cytoskeletal plasticity in cells expressing neuronal microtubule-associated proteins. Neuron 17:1189-1199, 1996.
22. Karila-Cohen, D., and S. P. Gabriel. Aspirin and prevention of cardiovascular risk. Rev. Med. Interne 1:35s-40s, 2000.
23. Kirshner, M., and T. Mitchison. Beyond self-assembly: From microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell 45:329-342, 1986.
24. Lauffenburger, D. A., and A. F. Horwitz. Cell Migration: A physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84:359-369, 1996.
25. Li, X., and R. B. Nicklas. Tension-sensitive kinetochore phosphorylation and the chromosome distribution checkpoint in praying mantid spermatocytes. J. Cell. Sci. 110:537-545, 1997.
26. Markel, R., P. Nassoy, A. Leung, K. Ritchie, and E. Evans. Energy landscapes of receptor-ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy. Nature (London) 397:50-53, 1999.
27. Pickett-Heaps, J. D., A. Forer, and T. Spurck. Traction fiber: Towards a tensegral model of the spindle. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 37:1-6, 1997.
28. Ra, H. J., C. Picart, H. Feng, H. L. Sweeney, and D. E. Discher. Muscle cell peeling from micropatterned collagen: Direct probing of focal and molecular properties of matrix adhesion. J. Cell. Sci. 112:1425-1436, 1999.
29. Ruoslahti, E., and J. C. Reed. Anchorage dependence, integrins, and apoptosis. Cell 77:477-478, 1994.
30. Sager, C., P. LeDuc, and T. Saif, In situ adhesion studies of a single living bovine endothelial cell using MEMS sensor. Proceedings of the 1st Annual International IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, Palais des Congres, Lyon, France, 12-14 October 2000, pp. 76-79.
31. Sager, C., T. Saif, and P. LeDuc. Adhesion Studies of Single Living Cells Using MEMS Sensors. Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, MEMS, 2000, Orlando, FL, 5-10 November 2000, Vol. 2, pp. 215-219.
32. Saif, M. T. A. On the capillary interaction between solid plates forming menisci on the surface of a liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 473:321-347, 2002.
33. Saif, M. T. A., and N. C. MacDonald. A milli-Newton microloading device. Sens. Actuators A 52:65-75, 1996.
34. Saif, M. T. A., and N. C. MacDonald. Planarity of large MEMS. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 5:79-97, 1996.
35. Saif, M. T. A., and N. C. MacDonald. Measurement of forces and spring constants of micro instruments. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69:1410-1422, 1998.
36. 2 integrins, and CD 45 to neutrophil cytoskeleton and membrane. Biophys. J. 77:587-596, 1999.
37. Shaw, K. A., Z. L. Zhang, and N. C. MacDonald. SCREAM-I: A single mask, single crystal silicon, reactive etching process for microelectromechanical structures. Sens. Actuators A 40:63-70, 1994.
38. Sukharev, S. I., B. Martinac, V. Y. Arshavsky, and C. Kung. Two types of mechanosensitive channels in the Escherichia coli cell envelope: Solubilization and functional reconstitution. Biophys. J. 65:177-183, 1993.
39. Van-Essen, D. C. A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature (London) 385:313-318, 1997.
40. Wang, N., J. P. Butler, and D. E. Ingber. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 260:1124-1127, 1993.
41. Yamamoto, A., S. Mishima, N. Maruyama, and M. Sumita. A new technique for direct measurement of the shear force necessary to detach a cell from a material. Biomaterials 19:871-879, 1998.