A new technique for direct measurement of the shear force necessary to detach a cell from a material

Biomaterials

Volumn 19, Issue 7-9, 1998, Pages 871-879

  Yamamoto, Akiko ^a   Mishima, Shuzo ^b   Maruyama, Norio ^a   Sumita, Masae ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Japan)

^b OLYMPUS CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biomaterial; Cell adhesion; Detachment shear strength; Microcantilever; Murine fibroblast

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; CHARGE COUPLED DEVICES; FORCE MEASUREMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; SHEAR STRENGTH; VIDEO RECORDING;

FIBROBLASTS; MICROCANTILEVERS;

BIOMATERIALS;

BIOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; FIBROBLAST; MEASUREMENT; MICROSCOPY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHEAR STRESS; VIDEOTAPE;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELLS, CULTURED; CULTURE MEDIA; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; FIBROBLASTS; GLASS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 17044444259     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00248-2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. [1] Weiss L. Studies on cellular adhesion in tissue culture IV. The alteration of substrata by cell surfaces. Exp Cell Res 1961; 25:504-17.
2. [2] Kawahara H, Maeda T, Izeki K, Juarez AS. Studies on cell adhesion to biomaterials by viscometric method, in vitro. Report 2; Adhesive strength of cells to glass surface. J Jpn Soc Biomater 1984;2:187-92.
3. [3] Yokoyama M. Studies on the adhesiveness of cells to biomaterials by using viscometric method, in vitro. J Jpn Soc Biomater 1988;6:29-43.
4. [4] Kokita K, Takeda S. Cell adhesion to dental materials. J Jpn Soc Dental Mater Dev 1993;12:242-49.
5. [5] Garcia AJ, Ducheyne P, Boettiger D. Quantification of cell adhesion using a spinning disc device and application to surface-reactive materials. Biomaterials 1997;18:1091-98.
6. [6] Vogler EA, Bussian RW. Short-term cell attachemnt rates: a surface-sensitive test of cell-substrate compatibility. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:1197-211.
7. [7] Horbett TA, Waldburger JJ, Ratner BD, Hoffman AS. Cell adhesion to a series of hydrophlic-hydrophobic copolymers studied with a spinning disc apparatus. J Biomed Mater Res 1988; 22:383-404.
8. [8] Reutelingsperger CPM, Van Gool RGJ, Heijnen V, Frederik P, Lindhout T. The rotating disc as a device to study the adhesive properties of endothelial cells under differential shear stresses. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1994;5:361-7.
9. [9] Skarja GA, Kinlough-Rathbone RL, Perry DW, Rubens FD, Brash JL. A cone and plate device for the investigation of platelet biomaterial interactions. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;34:427-38.
10. [10] Rezania A, Thomas CH, Branger AB, Waters CM, Healy KE. The detachment strength and morphology of bone cells contacting material modified with a peptide sequence foun within bon sialo-protein. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:9-19.
11. [11] Owens NF, Gingell D. Inhibition of cell adhesion by a synthetic polymer adsorbed to glass shown under defined hydrodynamic stress. J Cell Sci 1987;87:667-75.
12. [12] Otto M, Klein CL, K̃hler H, Wagner M, R̃hrig O, Kirkpartric CJ. Dynamic blood cell contact with biomaterials: validation of a flow chamber system according to international standards. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1997;8:119-29.
13. [13] Ushida T, Tateishi T, Moriya N. Cell adhesion strength to biomaterials and influence of fibronectin. Clinical Implant Mater 1990;9:231-6.
14. [14] Lotz MM, Burdsal CA, Erickson HP, McClay DR. Cell adhesion to fibronectin and tenascin: Qauntitative measurements of initial binding and subsequent strengthning response. The J Cell Biol 1989;109:1795-805.
15. [15] Francis GW, Fisher LR, Gamble RA, Gingell D. Direct measurement of cell detachment force on single cells using a new electromechanical method. J Cell Sci 1987;87:519-23.
16. [16] Kataoka N, Ujita S, Sato M. The response of F-actin filaments of cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells in the early stage after applying a fluid shear stress. Proc 74th JSME Fall Annual Meeting (I) 1996;117-18.
17. [17] Ikada Y. Surface modification of polymers for medical applications. Biomaterials 1994;15:725-36.
18. [18] Ii I. The existing state and the view of the development of tissue culture containers. Bioindustry 1985;2:981-9.
19. [19] Endo K, Abiko Y. Relationships among cell behaviors and surface characteristics of the dental metallic implant. Materia Japan 1995;34:1166-71.