Daily precipitation statistics in regional climate models: Evaluation and intercomparison for the European Alps

Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  Frei, Christoph ^a   Christensen, Jens Hesselbjerg ^b   Déqué, Michel ^c   Jacob, Daniela ^d   Jones, Richard G ^e   Vidale, Pier Luigi ^a  

^a Land Climate Dynamics Group   (Switzerland)

^b DANISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

^c CENTRE NATIONAL DE RECHERCHES MÉTÉOROLOGIQUES   (France)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR METEOROLOGY   (Germany)

^e MET OFFICE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alps; Climate change downscaling; Climate model evaluation; Extreme events; Heavy precipitation

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE MODELING; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); PRECIPITATION INTENSITY;

ALPS; EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 0042231792     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2002jd002287     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Beljaars, A. C. M., and P. Viterbo, The role of the boundary layer in a Numerical Weather Prediction model, in Clear and Cloudy Boundary Layers, edited by A. A. M. Holstlag and P. G. Duynkerke, pp. 287-304, R. Neth. Acad. of Arts and Sci., Netherlands, 1998.
2. Bougeault, P., A simple parameterization of the large-scale effects of cumulus convection, Mon. Weather Rev., 113, 2108-2121, 1985.
3. Buzzi, A., and L. Foschini, Mesoscale meteorological features associated with heavy precipitation in the Southern Alpine region, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 72, 131-146, 2000.
4. Christensen, O. B., Relaxation of soil variables in a regional climate model, Tellus, 51A, 674-685, 1999.
5. Christensen, J. H., O. B. Christensen, P. Lopez, E. Van Meijgaard, and M. Botzet, The HIRHAM4 regional atmospheric climate model, Sci. Rep. 96-4, 51 pp., DMI, Copenhagen, 1996.
6. Christensen, J. H., B. Machenhauer, R. G. Jones, C. Schär, P. M. Ruti, M. Castro, and G. Visconti, Validation of present-day climate simulations over Europe: LAM simulations with observed boundary conditions, Clim. Dyn., 13, 489-506, 1997.
7. Christensen, O. B., J. H. Christensen, B. Machenhauer, and M. Botzet, Very high-resolution regional climate simulations over Scandinavia: Present climate, J. Clim., 11, 3204-3229, 1998.
8. Christensen, J. H., J. Räisänen, T. Iversen, D. Bjorge, O. B. Christensen, and M. Rummukainen, A synthesis of regional climate change simulations: A Scandinavian perspective, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1003-1006, 2001a.
9. Christensen, J. H., O. B. Christensen, and J.-P. Schulz, Contribution from the Danish Meteorological Institute to the MERCURE Final Report (December 1997-November 2000), 2001b.
10. Christensen, J. H., O. B. Christensen, J.-P. Schulz, S. Hagemann, and M. Botzet, High resolution physiographic data set for HIRHAM4: An application to a 50 km horizontal resolution domain covering Europe, DMI Tech. Rep. 01-15, 21 pp., 2001c.
11. Christensen, J. H., O. B. Christensen, and P. Schulz, Contribution to the MERCURE Final Report (Dec 1997-Nov 2000), internal report of the Danish Meterol. Inst., Copenhagen, Denmark, 2002.
12. Cox, P. M., R. A. Betts, C. B. Bunton, R. L. H. Essery, P. R. Rowntree, and J. Smith, The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity, Clim. Dyn., 15, 183-203, 1999.
13. Cusack, S., J. M. Edwards, and R. Kershaw, Estimating the subgrid variance of saturation, and its parameterization for use in a GCM cloud scheme, Q. J. R. Meteorol Soc., 125, 3057-3076, 1999.
14. Dai, A., F. Giorgi, and K. E. Trenberth, Observed and model-simulated diurnal cycles of precipitation over the contiguous United States, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 6377-6402, 1999.
15. Daly, C., R. P. Neilson, and D. L. Phillips, A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain, J. Appl. Meteorol, 33, 140-158, 1994.
16. Davies, H. C., A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 102, 405-418, 1976.
17. Déqué, M., and J. P. Piedelievre, High-resolution climate simulations over Europe, Clim. Dyn., 11, 321-339, 1995.
18. Déqué, M., P. Marquet, and R. G. Jones, Simulation of climate change over Europe using a global variable resolution general circulation model, Clim. Dyn., 14, 173-189, 1998.
19. Dickinson, R. E., Modeling evapotranspiration for three-dimensional global climate models, in Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 29, edited by J. E. Hansen and T. Takahashi, pp. 58-72, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1984.
20. Douville, H., S. Planton, J. F. Royer, D. B. Stephenson, S. Tyteca, L. Kergoat, S. Lafont, and R. A. Betts, The importance of vegetation feedbacks in doubled-CO2 time-slice experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 14,841-14,861, 2000.
21. Dümenil, L., and E. Todini, A rainfall-runoff scheme for use in the Hamburg climate model, in Advances in Theoretical Hydrology, EGS Ser. Hydrol. Sci., vol. 1, edited by J. P. O'Kane, pp. 129-157, Elsevier Sci., New York, 1992.
22. Durman, C. F., J. M. Gregory, D. C. Hassell, R. G. Jones, and J. M. Murphy, A comparison of extreme European daily precipitation simulated by a global and a regional climate model for present and future climates, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 127, 1005-1015, 2001.
23. Edwards, J. M., and A. Slingo, Studies with a flexible new radiation code, 1, Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 122, 689-720, 1996.
24. Frei, C., and C. Schär, The frequency of heavy Alpine precipitation events: Results from the updated rain-gauge dataset, MAP Newsl, 7, 50-51, 1997.
25. Frei, C., and C. Schär, A precipitation climatology of the Alps from high-resolution rain-gauge observations, Int. J. Climatol., 18, 873-900, 1998.
26. Frei, C., C. Schär, D. Lüthi, and H. C. Davies, Heavy precipitation processes in a warmer climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1431-1434, 1998.
27. Gates, W. L., et al., An overview of the results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP I), Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 29-55, 1999.
28. Gibson, J. K., P. Kallberg, S. Uppala, A. Hernandey, A. Nomura, and E. Serano, ERA-15 description (version 2), ECMWF Reanalysis Proj. Rep. Series (Reading UK), vol. 1, 74 pp., 1999.
29. Giorgetta, M., and M. Wild, The water vapour continuum and its representation in ECHAM4, MPI for Meteorol. Rep. 162, 1995.
30. Giorgi, F., B. Hewitson, J. Christensen, C. Fu, R. Jones, M. Hulme, L. Mearns, H. Von Storch, and P. Whetton, Regional climate information: Evaluation and projections, in Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by J. T. Houghton et al., pp. 583-638, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2001.
31. Goodrich, D. C., M. Faures, D. A. Woolhiser, L. J. Lane, and S. Sorooshian, Measurement and analysis of small-scale convective storm rainfall variability, J. Hydrol., 173, 283-308, 1995.
32. Gregory, D., and S. Allen, The effect of convective downdraughts upon NWP and climate simulations, in Ninth Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, pp. 122-123, Am. Meteorol. Soc., Boston, Mass., 1991.
33. Gregory, D., and P. R. Rowntree, A mass-flux convection scheme with representation of cloud ensemble characteristics and stability dependent closure, Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 1483-1506, 1990.
34. Gregory, J. M., Representation of the radiative effect of convective anvils, Hadley Cent. Tech. Note 9, Hadley Cent., The Met. Off., Bracknell, 1999.
35. Gregory, J. M., and J. F. B. Mitchell, Simulation of daily variability of surface temperature and precipitation in the current and 2xCO2 climates of the UKMO climate model, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 121, 1451-1476, 1995.
36. Groisman, P. Y., and D. R. Legates, The accuracy of United States precipitation data, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 75, 215-227, 1994.
37. Hageman, S., M. Botzet, L. Dümenil, and B. Machenhauer, Derivation of global GCM boundary conditions for 1 km land use satellite data, MPI Rep. 289, Max-Planck Inst. für Meteorol., Hamburg, 1999.
38. Hagemann, S., M. Botzet, and B. Machenhauer, The summer drying problem over south-eastern Europe: Sensitivity of the limited area model HIRHAM4 to improvements in physical parameterization and resolution, Phys. Chem. Earth, Part B, 26, 391-396, 2001.
39. Hagemann, S., B. Machenhauer, O. B. Christensen, M. Déqué, D. Jacob, R. Jones, and P. L. Vidale, Intercomparison of water and energy budgets simulated by regional climate models applied over Europe, Rep. 338, Max-Planck Inst. for Meteorol., Hamburg, Germany, 2002.
40. Hansen, J., et al., Forcings and chaos in interannual to decadal climate change, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 25,679-25,720, 1997.
41. Heck, P., D. Lüthi, H. Wernli, and C. Schär, Climate impacts of European-scale anthropogenic vegetation changes: A sensitivity study using a regional climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 7817-7835, 2001.
42. Jacob, D., A note to the simulation of the annual and inter-annual variability of the water budget over the Baltic Sea drainage basin, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 77, 61-73, 2001.
43. Jacob, D., and R. Podzun, Sensitivity studies with the regional climate model REMO, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 63, 119-129, 1997.
44. Jacob, D., et al., A comprehensive model intercomparison study investigating the water budget during the BALTEX-PIDCAP period, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 77, 19-43, 2001.
45. Jacobsen, I., and E. Heise, A new economic method for the computation of the surface temperature in numerical models, Beitr. Phys. Atmos., 55, 128-141, 1982.
46. Jones, P. D., and P. A. Reid, Assessing future changes in extreme precipitation over Britain using regional climate model integrations, Int. J. Climatol., 21, 1337-1356, 2001.
47. Jones, R. G., J. M. Murphy, and M. Noguer, Simulation of climate change over Europe using a nested regional-climate model, 1, Assessment of control climate, including sensitivity to location of lateral boundaries, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 121, 1413-1449, 1995.
48. Jones, R. G., J. M. Murphy, M. Noguer, and A. B. Keen, Simulation of climate change over Europe using a nested regional-climate model, 2, Comparison of driving and regional model responses to a doubling of carbon dioxide, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 265-292, 1997.
49. Källén, E., HIRLAM Documentation Manual, System 2.5, Swed. Meteorol. and Hydrol. Inst. (SMHI), S-60176 Norrköping, Sweden), 1996.
50. Kessler, E., On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulation models, Meteorol. Monogr., 10, 18-54, 1969.
51. Kite, G. W., Simulating Columbia River flows with data from regional-scale climate models, Water Resour. Res., 33, 1275-1285, 1997.
52. Lau, K.-M., Y. Sud, and J. H. Kim, Intercomparison of hydrologic processes in AMIP GCMs, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 2209-2228, 1997.
53. Lin, Y.-L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 1065-1095, 1983.
54. Lüthi, D., A. Cress, C. Frei, and C. Schär, Interannual variability and regional climate simulations, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 53, 185-209, 1996.
55. Machenhauer, B., The HIRLAM Final Report, HIRLAM Tech. Rep. 5, 116 pp., Dan. Meteorol. Inst., Copenhagen, 1988.
56. Machenhauer, B., M. Windelband, M. Botzet, J. Hesselbjerg, M. Déqué, G. R. Jones, P. M. Ruti, and G. Visconti, Validation and analysis of regional present-day climate and climate change simulations over Europe, Rep. 275, 87 pp., Max-Planck Inst. of Meteorol., Hamburg, 1998.
57. Majewski, D., The Europa Modell of the Deutscher Wetterdienst, in Proceedings of the ECMWF Seminar on Numerical Methods in Atmospheric Models, vol. 2, pp. 147-191, Eur. Cent. For Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, U.K., 1991.
58. Majewski, D., and R. Schrodin, Short description of the Europa-Modell (EM) and Deutschland-Modell (DM) of the DWD, Q. Bull. (April), 1994.
59. Massacand, A. C., H. Wernli, and H. C. Davies, Heavy precipitation on the Alpine southside: An upper-level precursor, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1435-1438, 1998.
60. McGregor, J. L., Regional climate modelling, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 63, 105-117, 1997.
61. Mearns, L. O., F. Giorgi, and C. McDaniel, Analysis of daily variability of precipitation in a nested regional climate model: Comparison with observations and doubled CO2 results, Global Planet. Change, 10, 55-78, 1995.
62. Mearns, L. O., C. Rosenzweig, and R. Goldberg, Mean and variance change in climate scenarios: Methods, agricultural applications, and measures of uncertainty, Clim. Change, 35, 367-396, 1997.
63. Morcrette, J.-J., Description of the radiation scheme in the ECMWF model, ECMWF Tech, Memo. 165, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, UK, 1989.
64. Morcrette, J.-J., Impact of changes to the radiation transfer parameterizations plus cloud optical properties in the ECMWF model, Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 847-873, 1990.
65. Morcrette, J.-J., Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the ECMWF forecasting system, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 9121-9132, 1991.
66. Murphy, J. M., An evaluation of statistical and dynamical techniques for downscaling local climate, J. Clim., 12, 2256-2284, 1999.
67. Neff, E. L., How much rain does a rain gage gage?, J. Hydrol., 35, 213-220, 1977.
68. Nespor, V., and B. Sevruk, Estimation of wind-induced error of rainfall gauge measurements using a numerical simulation, J. Atmos. Oceanic. Technol., 16, 450-464, 1999.
69. New, M., M. Hulme, and P. Jones, Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability, part I, Development of a 1961-1990 mean monthly terrestrial climatology, J. Clim., 12, 829-856, 1999.
70. New, M., M. Hulme, and P. Jones, Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability, part 2, Development of 1961-1990 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate, J. Clim., 13, 2217-2238, 2000.
71. Noguer, M., R. G. Jones, and J. M. Murphy, Sources of systematic errors in the climatology of a regional climate model over Europe, Clim. Dyn., 14, 691-712, 1998.
72. Nordeng, T.-E., Extended versions of the conservative parameterization scheme at ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the tropics, ECMWF Tech. Memo. 206, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, UK, 1994.
73. Osborn, T. J., and M. Hulme, Development of a relationship between station and grid-box rainday frequencies for climate model evaluation, J. Clim., 10, 1885-1908, 1997.
74. Pan, Z., E. Takle, M. Segal, and R. Arritt, Simulation of potential impacts of man-made land use changes on U.S. summer climate under various synoptic regimes, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 6515-6528, 1999.
75. Pan, Z., J. H. Christensen, R. W. Arritt, W. J. Gutowski, E. S. Takle, and F. Otieno, Evaluation of uncertainties in regional climate change simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 17,735-17,751, 2001.
76. Pielke, R. A., R. L. Walko, L. T. Steyaert, P. L. Vidale, G. E. Liston, W. A. Lyons, and T. N. Chase, The influence of anthropogenic landscape changes on weather in South Florida, Mon. Weather Rev., 127, 1663-1673, 1999.
77. Pope, V. D., M. Gallani, P. R. Rowntree, and R. A. Stratton, The impact of new physical parameterizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3, Clim. Dyn., 16, 123-146, 2000.
78. Räisänen, J., and R. Joelsson, Changes in average and extreme precipitation in two regional climate model experiments, Tellus, 53A, 547-566, 2001.
79. Ricard, J. L., and J. F. Royer, A statistical cloud scheme for use in an AGCM, Ann. Geophys., 11, 1095-1115, 1993.
80. Richter, D., Ergebnisse methodischer Untersuchungen zur Korrektur des systematischen Messfehlers des Hellmann-Niederschlagsmessers, in Bericht des Deutschen Wetterdienstes, vol. 194, 93 pp., Dtsch. Wetterdienst DWD, Offenbach, Germany, 1995.
81. Ritter, B., and F. Geleyn, A comprehensive radiation scheme for numerical weather prediction models with potential applications in climate simulations, Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 303-325, 1992.
82. Roeckner, E., K. Arpe, L. Bengtsson, M. Christoph, M. Claussen, L. Dümenil, M. Esch, M. Giorgetta, U. Schlese, and U. Schulzweida, The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: Model description and simulation of present-day climate, Rep. 218, 90 pp., Max-Planck Inst. für Meteorol. (MPI), Hamburg, 1996.
83. Schädler, B., and R. Weingartner, Components of the natural water balance 1961-1990, Plate 6.3, Hydrol. Atlas of Switz., Fed. Off. for Water and Geol., Bern, Switzerland, 2002.
84. Schär, C., T. D. Davies, C. Frei, H. Wanner, M. Widmann, M. Wild, and H. C. Davies, Current Alpine climate, in A View From the Alps: Regional Perspectives on Climate Change, edited by P. Cebon, U. Dahinden, H. C. Davies, D. Imboden, and C. C. Jaeger, pp. 21-72, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1998.
85. Schär, C., D. Lüthi, U. Beyerle, and E. Heise, The soil-precipitation feedback: A process study with a regional climate model, J. Clim., 12, 722-741, 1999.
86. Schwarb, M., C. Daly, C. Frei, and C. Schär, Mean annual and seasonal precipitation in the European Alps 1971-1990, in Hydrological Atlas of Switzerland, Plates 2.6. and 2.7, Landeshydrol. und Geol., Bern, 2001.
87. Seneviratne, S. I., J. S. Pal, E. A. B. Eltahir, and C. Schär, Summer dryness in a warmer climate: A process study with a regional climate model, Clim. Dyn., 20, doi:10.1007/s00382-002-0258-4, 69-85, 2002.
88. Sevruk, B., Systematischer Niederschlagsmessfehler in der Schweiz, in Der Niederschlag in der Schweiz, Beitr. Geol. Schweiz. Hydrol., vol. 31, pp. 65-75, Bundesamt für Wasser und Geol., Bern, Switzerland, 1985.
89. Shepard, D. S., Computer mapping: The SYMAP interpolation algorithm, in Spatial Statistics and Models, edited by G. L. Gaile and C. J. Willmott, pp. 133-145, D. Reidel, Norwell, Mass., 1984.
90. Skelly, W. C., and A. Henderson-Sellers, Grid-box or grid-point: What type of precipitation data do GCMs deliver to climate impact researchers?, Int. J. Climatol., 16, 1079-1086, 1996.
91. Smith, R. N. B., A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 116, 435-460, 1990.
92. Stein, J., E. Richard, J. P. Lafore, J. P. Pinty, N. Asencio, and S. Cosma, High-resolution non-hydrostatic simulations of flash-flood episodes with grid-nesting and ice-phase parameterization, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 72, 203-221, 2000.
93. Stone, M. C., R. H. Hotchkiss, C. M. Hubbard, T. A. Fontaine, and J. G. Mearns, Impacts of climate change on Missouri River Basin water yield, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37, 1119-1129, 2001.
94. Sundqvist, H., A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation including prediction of cloud water content, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 104, 677-690, 1978.
95. Sundqvist, H., Parameterization of condensation and associated clouds for weather prediction and general circulation simulations, in Physically Based Modeling and Simulation of Climate and Climate Change, edited by M. E. Schlesinger, pp. 433-461, D. Reidel, Norwell, Mass., 1988.
96. Tiedtke, M., A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779-1800, 1989.
97. Warner, T. T., R. A. Peterson, and R. E. Treadon, A tutorial on lateral boundary conditions as a basic and potentially serious limitation to regional numerical weather prediction, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2599-2617, 1997.
98. Wild, M., A. Ohmura, and U. Cubasch, GCM simulated surface energy fluxes in climate change experiments, J. Clim., 10, 3093-3110, 1997.
99. Willmott, C. J., C. M. Rowe, and W. D. Philpot, Small-scale climate maps: A sensitivity analysis of some common assumptions associated with grid-point interpolation and contouring, Am. Cartogr., 12, 5-16, 1985.