Contact order dependent protein folding rates: Kinetic consequences of a cooperative interplay between favorable nonlocal interactions and local conformational preferences

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 524-533

  Kaya, Hüseyin ^a   Chan, Hue Sun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Calorimetry; Chevron plot; G models; Nonadditivity; Simple two state kinetics; Single domain proteins

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; SINGLE DOMAIN PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BINDING KINETICS; CALORIMETRY; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CHEVRON PLOT; CONTACT ORDER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ENERGY; GO MODEL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS;

KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0042631521     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10478     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Jackson SE, Fersht AR. Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2.1. Evidence for a two-state transition. Biochemistry 1991;30:10428-10435.
2. Baker D. A surprising simplicity to protein folding. Nature 2000;405:39-42.
3. Chan HS. Modeling protein density of states: additive hydrophobic effects are insufficient for calorimetric two-state cooperativity. Proteins 2000;40:543-571.
4. Kaya H, Chan HS. Polymer principles of protein calorimetric two-state cooperativity. Proteins 2000;40:637-661 [Erratum: Proteins 2001;43:523].
5. Kaya H, Chan HS. Energetic components of cooperative protein folding. Phys Rev Lett 2000;85:4823-4826.
6. Kaya H, Chan HS. Towards a consistent modeling of protein thermodynamic and kinetic cooperativity: how applicable is the transition state picture to folding and unfolding? J Mol Biol 2002;315:899-909.
7. Chan HS, Kaya H, Shimizu S. Computational methods for protein folding: scaling a hierarchy of complexities. In: Jiang T, Xu Y, Zhang MQ, editors. Current Topics in Computational Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2002. p 403-447.
8. Kaya H, Chan HS. Solvation effects and driving forces for protein thermodynamic and kinetic cooperativity: how adequate is native-centric topological modeling? J Mol Biol 2003;326:911-931.
9. Kaya H, Chan HS. Origins of chevron rollovers in non-two-state protein folding kinetics. Phys Rev Lett 2003;90:258104.
10. Kaya H, Chan HS. Simple two-state protein folding kinetics requires near-Levinthal thermodynamic cooperativity. Proteins 2003;52:510-523.
11. Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins 1995;21:167-195.
12. Dill KA, Bromberg S, Yue K, Fiebig KM, Yee DP, Thomas PD, Chan HS. Principles of protein folding - a perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci 1995;4:561-602.
13. Thirumalai D, Woodson SA. Kinetics of folding of proteins and RNA. Acc Chem Res 1996;29:433-439.
14. Chan HS, Dill KA. Protein folding in the landscape perspective: chevron plots and non-Arrhenius kinetics. Proteins 1998;30:2-33.
15. Mirny L, Shakhnovich E. Protein folding theory: from lattice to all-atom models. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2001;30:361-396.
16. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol 1998;227:985-994.
17. Chan HS. Matching speed and locality. Nature 1998;392:761-763.
18. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Topology, stability, sequence, and length: defining the determinants of two-state protein folding kinetics. Biochemistry 2000;39:11177-11183.
19. Alm E, Baker D. Prediction of protein-folding mechanisms from free-energy landscapes derived from native structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:11305-11310.
20. Muñoz V, Eaton WA. A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:11311-11316.
21. Debe DA, Goddard WA. First principles prediction of protein folding rates. J Mol Biol 1999;294:619-625.
22. Makarov DE, Keller CA, Plaxco KW, Metiu H. How the folding rate constant of simple, single-domain proteins depends on the number of native contacts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:3535-3539.
23. Abkevich VI, Gutin AM, Shakhnovich EI. Impact of local and nonlocal interactions on thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding. J Mol Biol 1995;252:460-471.
24. Faisca PFN, Ball RC. Topological complexity, contact order, and protein folding rates. J Chem Phys 2002;117:8587-8591.
25. Koga N, Takada S. Roles of native topology and chain-length scaling in protein folding: a simulation study with a Gō-like model. J Mol Biol 2001;313:171-180.
26. Cieplak M, Hoang TX. Universality classes in folding times of proteins. Biophys J 2003;84:475-488.
27. Jewett AI, Pande VS, Plaxco KW. Cooperativity, smooth energy landscapes and the origins of topology-dependent protein folding rates. J Mol Biol 2003;326:247-253.
28. Uversky VN, Fink AL. The chicken-egg scenario of protein folding revisited. FEBS Lett 2002;515:79-83.
29. Baldwin RL, Rose GD. Is protein folding hierarchic? I. Local structure and peptide folding. Trends Biochem Sci 1999;24:26-33.
30. Shortle D. Composites of local structure propensities: evidence for local encoding of long-range structure. Protein Sci 2002;11:18-26.
31. Gō N, Taketomi H. Respective roles of short- and long-range interactions in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978;75:559-563.
32. Dill KA. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry 1990;29:7133-7155.
33. Minor DL, Kim PS. Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence. Nature 1996;380:730-734.
34. Feldman HJ, Hogue CWV. Probabilistic sampling of protein conformations: new hope for brute force? Proteins 2002;46:8-23.
35. Shimizu S, Chan HS. Origins of protein denatured state compactness and hydrophobic clustering in aqueous urea: inferences from nonpolar potentials of mean force. Proteins 2002;49:560-566.
36. Micheletti C, Banavar JR, Maritan A, Seno F. Protein structures and optimal folding from a geometrical variational principle. Phys Rev Lett 1999;82:3372-3375.
37. Clementi C, Nymeyer H, Onuchic JN. Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. J Mol Biol 2000;298:937-953.
38. Linhananta A, Zhou Y. The role of sidechain packing and native contact interactions in folding: discontinuous molecular dynamics folding simulations of an all-atom Gō model of fragment B of Staphylococcal protein A. J Chem Phys 2002;117:8983-8995.
39. Thomas PD, Dill KA. Local and nonlocal interactions in globular proteins and mechanisms of alcohol denaturation. Protein Sci 1993;2:2050-2065.
40. Kolinski A, Galazka W, Skolnick J. On the origin of the cooperativity of protein folding: implications from model simulations. Proteins 1996;26:271-287.
41. Plotkin SS, Wang J, Wolynes PG. Statistical mechanics of a correlated energy landscape model for protein folding funnels. J Chem Phys 1997;106:2932-2948.
42. Liwo A, Kazmierkiewicz R, Czaplewski C, Groth M, Oldziej S, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Pincus MR, Scheraga HA. United-residue force field for off-lattice protein structure simulations: III. Origin of backbone hydrogen-bonding cooperativity in united-residue potentials. J Comput Chem 1998;19:259-276.
43. Takada S, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG. Folding dynamics with nonadditive forces: a simulation study of a designed helical protein and a random heteropolymer. J Chem Phys 1999;110:11616-11629.
44. Eastwood MP, Wolynes PG. Role of explicitly cooperative interactions in protein folding funnels: a simulation study. J Chem Phys 2001;114:4702-4716.
45. Chan HS, Dill KA. The effect of internal constraints on the configurations of chain molecules. J Chem Phys 1990;92:3118-3135 [Erratum: J Chem Phys 1997;107:10353].
46. Chan HS, Bornberg-Bauer E. Perspectives on protein evolution from simple exact models. Appl Bioinformatics 2002;1:121-144.
47. Gutin A, Sali A, Abkevich V, Karplus M, Shakhnovich EI. Temperature dependence of the folding rate in a simple protein model: search for a "glass" transition. J Chem Phys 1998;108:6466-6483.
48. Matthews CR. Effect of point mutations on the folding of globular proteins. Methods Enzymol 1987;154:498-511.
49. Abkevich VI, Gutin AM, Shakhnovich EI. Free energy landscape for protein folding kinetics: intermediates, traps, and multiple pathways in theory and lattice model simulations. J Chem Phys 1994;101:6052-6062.
50. Northey JGB, Di Nardo AA, Davidson AR. Hydrophobic core packing in the SH3 domain folding transition state. Nature Struct Biol 2002;9:126-130.
51. Zhou HY, Zhou YQ. Folding rate prediction using total contact distance. Biophys J 2002;82:458-463.
52. Chan HS, Shimizu S, Kaya H. Cooperativity principles in protein folding. Methods Enzymol 2003; in press.
53. Dunbrack RL. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:431-440.
54. Shimizu S, Chan HS. Anti-cooperativity and cooperativity in hydrophobic interactions: three-body free energy landscapes and comparison with implicit-solvent potential functions for proteins. Proteins 2002;48:15-30. [Erratum: Proteins 2002;49:294].
55. Micheletti C. Prediction of folding rates and transition-state placement from native-state geometry. Proteins 2003;51:74-84.