Out of Africa: Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of Wolffiella (Lemnaceae)

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 565-576

  Kimball, Rebecca T ^a   Crawford, Daniel J ^b   Les, Donald H ^c   Landolt, Elias ^d  

^a University of Florida ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^d ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Allozymes; Duckweeds; matK; rbcL; rpl16

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC PLANT; BIOGEOGRAPHY; PHYLOGENY;

ARACEAE; WOLFFIELLA; WOLFFIELLA WELWITSCHII;

EID: 0041566664     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00210.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Crawford DJ, Landolt E. 1995. Allozyme divergence among species of Wolffia (Lemnaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 197: 59-70.
2. Crawford DJ, Landolt E, Les DH, Tepe E. 1997. Allozyme variation and the taxonomy of Wolffiella (Lemnaceae). Aquatic Botany 58: 43-54.
3. Farris JS, Källersjo M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
4. Fehrer J. 1996. Conflicting character distribution within different data sets of cardueline finches: Artifact or history? Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 7-20.
5. Goldman N, Anderson JP, Rodrigo AG. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 49: 652-670.
6. Johnson LA, Soltis DE. 1995. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia (Polemoniaceae) using mark sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 149-175.
7. Jordan WC, Courtney MW, Neigel JE. 1996. Low levels of intraspecific genetic variation at a rapidly evolving chloroplast DNA locus in North American duckweeds (Lemnaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 430-439.
8. Kellogg EA, Juliano ND. 1997. The structure and function of rubisco and their implications for systematic studies. American Journal of Botany 84: 413-428.
9. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. MEGA: molecular evolution genetic analysis, Vers. 1.0. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University.
10. Landolt E. 1986. Biosystematic investigations in the family of duckweeds (Lemnaceae) volume 2. The family of Lemnaceae - a monographic study, volume 1. Veroffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH, Stiftung Rubel Zurich 71.
11. Landolt E. 1992. Wolffiella caudata, a new Lemnaceae species from the Bolivian Amazon region. Berichte des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH, Stiftung Rubel, in Zurich 58: 121-123.
12. Landolt E. 1994. The Lemnaceae of Zimbabwe and Botswana. Berichte des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH, Stiftung Rubel, in Zurich 60: 110-136.
13. Landolt E. 1997. How do Lemnaceae (duckweeds) survive dry conditions? Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH. 63: 25-31.
14. Landolt E. 2000. Contribution on the Lemnaceae of Ecuador. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 45: 221-237.
15. Les DH, Crawford DJ. 1999. Landoltia (Lemnaceae), a new genus of duckweeds. Novon 9: 530-533.
16. Les DH, Crawford DJ, Landolt E, Aakjar R, Tepe E. 1997a. Systematics of Lemnaceae revisited. American Journal of Botany 84: 211.
17. Les DH, Crawford DJ, Landolt E, Gabel JD, Kimball RT. 2002. Phylogeny and systematics of Lemnaceae, the duck-weed family. Systematic Botany 27: 221-240.
18. Les DH, Landolt E, Crawford DJ. 1997b. Systematics of Lemnaceae: inferences from micromolecular and morphological data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 204: 161-177.
19. Manos PS, Steele KP. 1997. Phylogenetic analyses of 'higher' Hamamelididae based on plastid sequence data. American Journal of Botany 84: 1407-1419.
20. Nei M, Gojobori T. 1986. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Molecular Biology and Evolution 3: 418-426.
21. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
22. Rambaut A, Grassly NC. 1997. Seq-Gen: An application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Computer Applications in Biosciences 13: 235-238.
23. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology. 49: 369-381.
24. Small RL, Ryburn JA, Cronn RC, Seelanan T, Wendel JF. 1998. The tortoise and the hare: choosing between noncoding plastome and nuclear ADH sequences for phylogeny reconstruction in a recently diverged plant group. American Journal of Botany 85: 1301-1315.
25. Steele KP, Vilgalys R. 1994. Phylogenetic analyses of Polemoniaceae using nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene matK. Systematic Botany 19: 126-142.
26. Swofford DL. 1999. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
27. Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Marble BK, eds. Molecular systematics, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 404-514.
28. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. Clustal W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680.
29. Xiang Q-Y, Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornaceae and close relatives inferred from mark and rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 85: 285-297.
30. Xiang Q-Y, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Manchester SR, Crawford DJ. 2000. Timing the eastern Asian-eastern North American floristic disjunction: molecular clock corroborates paleontological estimates. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15: 462-472.
31. Yang Z. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood (PAML). Vers. 3.12. London: University College.
32. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 2000. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 32-43.