La dissociation automatique vs. contrôlée en rappel : Application de la PDP de Jacoby (1991, 1998)

Revue de Neuropsychologie

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 97-128

  Nicolas, Serge ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Concious memory; Jacoby; Unconcious memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041029450     PISSN: 11554452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Bartlett, J. C., Strater, L., & Fulton, A. (1991). False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age. Memory and Cognition, 19, 177-188.
2. Besche, C., Passerieux, C., Nicolas, S., Laurent, J.P., Hardy-Baylé, M.-C. (1999). Fluency versus conscious recollection in category-production performance: the performance of schizophrenic patients. Brain and Cognition, 39, 100-115.
3. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1995). Towards unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
4. Cermak, L. S., Mather, M., & Hill, R. (1997). Unconscious influences on amnesics' word-stem completion. Neuropsychologia, 35, 605-610.
5. Cermak, L. S., Verfaellie, M., Sweeney, M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1992). Fluency versus conscious recollection in the word completion performance of amnesic patients. Brain and Cognition, 20, 367-377.
6. Cowan, N., & Stadler, M. A. (1996). Estimating unconscious processes: Implications of a general class of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 195-200.
7. Curran, T., & Hintzman, D. L. (1995). Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 531-547.
8. Curran, T., & Hintzman, D. L. (1997). Consequences and causes of correlations in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 496-504.
9. Debner, J. A., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Unconscious perception: Attention, awareness, and control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 304-317.
10. Deweer, B., & Ergis, A.-M. (1998). Vieillissement pathologique et systèmes de mémoire: Expressions implicites de la mémoire dans les syndromes démentiels. Psychologie Française, 43, 55-70.
11. Dodson, C. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
12. Dywan, J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1990). Effects of aging on source monitoring: Differences in susceptibility to false fame. Psychology and Aging, 5, 379-387.
13. Gabrieli, J. D. E., Milberg, W., Keane, M., & Corkin, S. (1990). Intact priming of patterns despite impaired memory. Neuropsychologia, 28, 417-427.
14. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What is memory for? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
15. Graf, P. (1995). Defining the opposition procedure: A reply to Toth, Reingold and Jacoby's (1995) response to Graf and Komatsu (1994). European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 225-231.
16. Graf, P., & Komatsu, S. (1994). Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution! European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 113-129.
17. Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 501-518.
18. Hasher, L., & Zachs, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356-388.
19. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1997). More than one way to violate independence: Reply to Jacoby and Shrout (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 511-513.
20. Hirshman, E. (1998). On the logic of testing the independence assumption in the process-dissociation procedure. Memory and Cognition, 26, 857-859.
21. Isingrini, M. (1998). Vieillissement et tâches implicites de mémoire: données et interprétations. Psychologie Française, 43, 39-54.
22. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
23. Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 3-26.
24. Jacoby, L. L., Begg, I. M., & Toth, J. P. (1997a). In defense of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 484-495.
25. Jacoby, L. L., & Hollinghead, A. (1990). Toward a generate/recognize model of performance on direct and indirect tests of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 433-454.
26. Jacoby, L. L., & Kelley, C. M. (1992). A process-dissociation framework for investigating unconscious influences: Freudian slips, projective tests, subliminal perception, and signal detection theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 174-179.
27. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, S., & Toth, J. P. (1992). Unconscious influences revealed: Attention, awareness, and control. American Psychologist, 47, 802-809.
28. Jacoby, L. L., & Shrout, P. E. (1997). Toward a psychometric analysis of violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 505-510.
29. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., Lindsay, S., & Debner, J. A. (1992). Lectures for a layperson: Methods for revealing unconscious processes. In R. F. Bornstein & T. S. Pitman (Eds.), Perception without awareness: Cognitive, clinical, and social perspectives (pp. 81-120). New Yok: Guilford Press.
30. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
31. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., Yonelinas, A. P., & Debner, J. A. (1994). The relationship between conscious and unconscious influences: Independence or redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 216-219.
32. Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
33. Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., & Jennings, J. M. (1997b). The relationship between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to the question of consciousness (pp. 13-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Jennings, J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283-293.
35. Jones, G. V. (1987). Independence and exclusivity among psychological processes: Implications for the structure of recall. Psychological Review, 94, 229-235.
36. Joordens, S., & Merikle, P. M. (1993). independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 462-467.
37. Knight, R. G. (1998). Controlled and automatic memory process in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 34, 427-435.
38. Koivisto, M., Portin, R., Seinelä, & Rinne, J. (1998). Automatic influences of memory in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 34, 209-219.
39. Mayes, A. R., Van Eijk, R., & Isaac, C. L. (1995). Assessment of familiarity and recollection in the false fame paradigm using a modified process dissociation procedure. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1, 469-482.
40. Merikle, P. M., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) tasks to study unconscious memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 224-233.
41. Meulemans, T. (1998). Apprentissage implicite, mémoire implicite et développement. Psychologie Française, 43, 27-37.
42. Mulligan, N. W., & Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory and Cognition, 24, 453-465.
43. Mulligan, N. W., & Hirshman, E. (1997). Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 280-304.
44. Nicolas, S. (1993). Mémoire implicite et mémoire explicite: Eléments introductifs. In J.-M. Danion, M. Van Der Linden, S. Nicolas, S. Peretti, & F. Sallal (Eds.), Mémoire explicite, mémoire implicite et pathologies psychiatriques (pp. 23-88). Paris: Masson.
45. Nicolas, S. (1994). Réflexions autour du concept de mémoire implicite. L'Année Psychologique, 94, 63-80.
46. Nicolas, S. (1999). Comment l'homme conserve-t-il des souvenirs? In A. Weil-Barais (Ed.), L'homme cognitif (5e édition, pp. 315-428). Paris: Presses Universitairés de France.
47. Nicolas, S., Carbonnel, S., & Tiberghien, G. (1992). Les capacités préservées d'apprentissage et de mémoire chez les patients atteints d'amnésie organique. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 2, 227-268.
48. Nicolas, S., & Perruchet, P. (1998) (Eds.). Mémoire et apprentissage implicite (Psychologie Française, tome 43, no 1). Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
49. Parkin, A. J., Reid, T. K., & Russo, R. (1990). On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 507-514.
50. Parkin, A. J., & Russo, R. (1990). Implicit and explicit memory and the automatic/effortful distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 71-80.
51. Reingold, E. M., & Merikle, P. M. (1988). Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 563-575.
52. Reingold, E. M., & Merikle, P. M. (1990). On the inter-relatedness of theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes. Mind and Language, 5, 9-28.
53. Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475-543.
54. Richardson,-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1996). Memory: Task dissociations, process dissociations, and dissociations of consciousness. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 85-158). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (vol. 8, pp. 63-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
56. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1994). The problem of differing false-alarm rates for the process dissociation procedure: Comment on Verfaellie and Treadwell (1993). Neuropsychology, 8, 284-288.
57. Russo, R., & Andrade, J. (1995). The directed forgetting effect in word fragment completion: An application of the process dissociation procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 405-423.
58. Russo, R., Cullis, A. M., & Parkin, A. J. (1998). Consequences of violating the assumption of independence in the process dissociation procedure: A word fragment completion study. Memory and Cognition, 26, 617-632.
59. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
60. Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J., & Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
62. Squire, L. R., & McKee, R. D. (1993). Declarative and nondeclarative memory in opposition: When prior events influence amnesic patients more than normal subjects. Memory and Cognition, 21, 424-430.
63. Ste-Marie, D. N., Jennings, J. M., & Finlayson, A. J. (1996). Process dissociation procedure: Memory testing in populations with brain damage. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10, 25-36.
64. Toth, J. P. (1995). Unintentional influences and opposition: A reply to Graf. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 233-237.
65. Toth, J. P. (1996). Conceptual automaticity in recognition memory: Levels-of-processing effects on familiarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 123-138.
66. Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Towards a redefinition of implicit memory: Process dissociation following elaborative processing and self-generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 290-303.
67. Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). A response to Graf and Komatsu's critique of the process dissociation procedure: When is caution necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 113-130.
68. Verfaellie, M., & Treadwell, J. R. (1993). The status of recognition memory in amnesia. Neuropsychology, 7, 5-13.
69. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
70. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Response bias and the process dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 422-439.
71. Yonelinas, A. P., Regehr, G., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). Incorporating response bias in a dual-process theory of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 821-835.