The formation of structurally relevant units in artificial grammar learning

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 485-503

  Perruchet, Pierre ^a   Vinter, Annie ^a   Pacteau, Chantal ^b   Gallego, Jorge ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; READING; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 0040077744     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000451     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aslin, R.N., Woodward, J.Z., LaMendola, N.P., & Bever, T.G. (1996). Models of word segmentation in fluent maternal speech to infants. In J.L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax (pp. 117-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Bates, E., & Elman, J. (1996). Learning rediscovered. Science, 274, 1849
3. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
4. Bower, T.G.R. (1979). Human development. San Francisco: Freeman.
5. Brent, M.R. (1996). Advances in the computational study of language acquisition. Cognition, 61, 1-38.
6. Brent, M.R. (1999). Speech segmentation and word discovery: A computational perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 294-301.
7. Brent, M.R., & Cartwright, T.A. (1996). Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition, 61, 93-125.
8. Brooks, L.R. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 169-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Buchner, A., Steffens, M.C., & Rothkegel, R. (1998). On the role of fragmentary knowledge in a sequence learning task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 251-281.
10. Christiansen, M.H., Allen, J., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1998). Learning to segment speech using multiple cues: A connectionist model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 221-268.
11. Cleeremans, A. (1993). Mechanisms of implicit learning: A connectionist model of sequence processing (p. 227). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
12. Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406-416.
13. Dulany, D.E., Carlson, A., & Dewey, G.I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgement: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541-555.
14. Elman, J.L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211.
15. Gomez, R.L., & Schvanevelt, R.W. (1994). What is learned from artificial grammar? Transfer tests of simple association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 396-410.
16. Higham, P.A. (1997a). Chunks are not enough: The insufficiency of feature frequency-based explanations of artifician grammar learning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 126-138.
17. Higham, P.A. (1997b). Dissociations of grammaticality and specific similarity effects in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1029-1045.
18. Jusczyk, P.W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
20. Knowlton, B.J., & Squire, L.R. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 79-91.
21. Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. (1992). Nonconscious acquisition of information. American Psychologist, 47, 796-801.
22. Markman, E.M. (1990). Constraints children place on word meanings. Cognitive Science, 14, 57-77.
23. Mathews, R.C. (1990). Abstractness of implicit grammar knowledge: Comments on Perruchet and Pacteau's analysis of synthetic grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 412-416.
24. Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Taylor, S. (1998). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 3-27.
25. Neal, A., & Hesketh, B. (1997). Episodic knowledge and implicit learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 24-37.
26. Perruchet, P., & Gallego, J. (1997). A subjective unit formation account of implicit learning. In D. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 124-161). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary-knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
28. Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998a). Learning and development: The implicit knowledge assumption reconsidered. In M. Stadler & P. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 495-531). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998b). PARSER: A model for word segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 246-263.
30. Perruchet, P., Vinter, A., & Gallego, J. (1997). Implicit learning shapes new conscious percepts and representations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 43-48.
31. Reber, A.S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
32. Reber, A.S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Reber, A.S., Kassin, S.M., Lewis, S., & Cantor, G. (1980). On the relationship between implicit and explicit modes in the learning of a complex rule structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 492-502.
34. Redington, M., & Chafer, N. (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A re-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123-138.
35. Redington, M., & Chater, N. (1997). Probabilistic and distributional approaches to language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 273-277.
36. Saffran, J.R., Newport, E.L., & Aslin, R.N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606-621.
37. Saffran, J.R., Newport, E.L., Aslin, R.N., Tunick, R.A., & Barrueco, S. (1997). Incidental language learning. Psychological Science, 8, 101-105.
38. Schyns, P.G., Goldstone, R.L., & Thibaut, J.P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-53.
39. Servan-Schreiber, D., & Anderson, J.R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592-608.
40. Spelke, E.S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605-632.
41. Stadler, M.A. (1995). The role of attention in implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 674-685.
42. Vokey, J.R., & Brooks, L.R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammar. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 328-344.
43. Whittlesea, B., & Dorken, M.D. (1993). Incidentally, things in general are incidentally determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 227-248.