RNA Recognition via the SAM Domain of Smaug

Molecular Cell

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1537-1548

  Green, Justin B ^a   Gardner, Cary D ^b   Wharton, Robin P ^b   Aggarwal, Aneel K ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN; PROTEIN NANOS; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REGULATORY SEQUENCE; RNA ANALYSIS; RNA BINDING; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0038771210     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00178-3     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andrade M.A., Petosa C., O'Donoghue S.I., Muller C.W., Bork P. Comparison of ARM and HEAT protein repeats. J. Mol. Biol. 309:2001;1-18.
2. Brunger A.T., Adams P.D., Clore G.M., DeLano W.L., Gros P., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Jiang J.S., Kuszewski J., Nilges M., Pannu N.S.et al. Crystallography & NMR system. a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54:1998;905-921.
3. Chagnovich D., Lehmann R. Poly(A)-independent regulation of maternal hunchback translation in the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;11359-11364.
4. Chook Y.M., Blobel G. Structure of the nuclear transport complex karyopherin-beta2-Ran x GppNHp. Nature. 399:1999;230-237.
5. Cingolani G., Petosa C., Weis K., Muller C.W. Structure of importin-beta bound to the IBB domain of importin-alpha. Nature. 399:1999;221-229.
6. Crucs S., Chatterjee S., Gavis E.R. Overlapping but distinct RNA elements control repression and activation of nanos translation. Mol. Cell. 5:2000;457-467.
7. Curtis D., Lehmann R., Zamore P.D. Translational regulation in development. Cell. 81:1995;171-178.
8. Dahanukar A., Wharton R.P. The Nanos gradient in Drosophila embryos is generated by translational regulation. Genes Dev. 10:1996;2610-2620.
9. Dahanukar A., Walker J.A., Wharton R.P. Smaug, a novel RNA-binding protein that operates a translational switch in Drosophila. Mol. Cell. 4:1999;209-218.
10. Draper D.E. Themes in RNA-protein recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 293:1999;255-270.
11. Gavis E.R., Lunsford L., Bergsten S.E., Lehmann R. A conserved 90 nucleotide element mediates translational repression of nanos mRNA. Development. 122:1996;2791-2800.
12. Gray N.K., Wickens M. Control of translation initiation in animals. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14:1998;399-458.
13. Green J.B., Edwards T.A., Trincao J., Escalante C.R., Wharton R.P., Aggarwal A.K. Crystallization and characterization of Smaug. a novel RNA binding motif Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 297:2002;1085-1088.
14. Groves M.R., Barford D. Topological characteristics of helical repeat proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:1999;383-389.
15. Groves M.R., Hanlon N., Turowski P., Hemmings B.A., Barford D. The structure of the protein phosphatase 2A PR65/A subunit reveals the conformation of its 15 tandemly repeated HEAT motifs. Cell. 96:1999;99-110.
16. Hargreaves D., Rice D.W., Sedelnikova S.E., Artymiuk P.J., Lloyd R.G., Rafferty J.B. Crystal structure of E. coli Ruva with bound DNA Holliday junction at 6 Å resolution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5:1998;441-446.
17. Jones T.A., Zou J.Y., Cowan S.W., Kjeldgaard Improved methods for binding protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A Struct. Sci. 47:1991;110-119.
18. Kim C.A., Phillips M.L., Kim W., Gingery M., Tran H.H., Robinson M.A., Faham S., Bowie J.U. Polymerization of the SAM domain of TEL in leukemogenesis and transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 20:2001;4173-4182.
19. Kim C.A., Gingery M., Pilpa R.M., Bowie J.U. The SAM domain of polyhomeotic forms a helical polymer. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:2002;453-457.
20. Levrero M., De Laurenzi V., Costanzo A., Gong J., Wang J.Y., Melino G. The p53/p63/p73 family of transcription factors. overlapping and distinct functions J. Cell Sci. 113:2000;1661-1670.
21. Macdonald P.M., Smibert C.A. Translational regulation of maternal mRNAs. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6:1996;403-407.
22. Marcotrigiano J., Lomakin I.B., Sonenberg N., Pestova T.V., Hellen C.U., Burley S.K. A conserved HEAT domain within eIF4G directs assembly of the translation initiation machinery. Mol. Cell. 7:2001;193-203.
23. Nagai K. RNA-protein complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6:1996;53-61.
24. Nicholls A., Sharp K.A., Honig B. Protein folding and association. insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons Proteins. 11:1991;281-296.
25. Rafferty J.B., Sedelnikova S.E., Hargreaves D., Artymiuk P.J., Baker P.J., Sharples G.J., Mahdi A.A., Lloyd R.G., Rice D.W. Crystal structure of DNA recombination protein RuvA and a model for its binding to the Holliday junction. Science. 274:1996;415-421.
26. Schultz J., Ponting C.P., Hofmann K., Bork P. SAM as a protein interaction domain involved in developmental regulation. Protein Sci. 6:1997;249-253.
27. SenGupta D.J., Zhang B., Kraemer B., Pochart P., Fields S., Wickens M. A three-hybrid system to detect RNA-protein interactions in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;8496-8501.
28. Serra-Pages C., Kedersha N.L., Fazikas L., Medley Q., Debant A., Streuli M. The LAR transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase and a coiled-coil LAR-interacting protein co-localize at focal adhesions. EMBO J. 14:1995;2827-2838.
29. Smibert C.A., Wilson J.E., Kerr K., Macdonald P.M. Smaug protein represses translation of unlocalized nanos mRNA in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 10:1996;2600-2609.
30. Smibert C.A., Lie Y.S., Shillinglaw W., Henzel W.J., Macdonald P.M. Smaug, a novel and conserved protein, contributes to repression of nanos mRNA translation in vitro. RNA. 5:1999;1535-1547.
31. Sonoda J., Wharton R.P. Drosophila Brain Tumor is a translational repressor. Genes Dev. 15:2001;762-773.
32. Stapleton D., Balan I., Pawson T., Sicheri F. The crystal structure of an Eph receptor SAM domain reveals a mechanism for modular dimerization. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:1999;44-49.
33. Stein E., Huynh-Do U., Lane A.A., Cerretti D.P., Daniel T.O. Nck recruitment to Eph receptor, EphB1/ELK, couples ligand activation to c-Jun kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1998;1303-1308. a.
34. Stein E., Lane A.A., Cerretti D.P., Schoecklmann H.O., Schroff A.D., Van Etten R.L., Daniel T.O. Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses. Genes Dev. 12:1998;667-678. b.
35. Terwilliger T.C., Berendzen J. Automated MAD and MIR structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55:1999;849-861.
36. Thanos C.D., Goodwill K.E., Bowie J.U. Oligomeric structure of the human EphB2 receptor SAM domain. Science. 283:1999;833-836.
37. Vidal M., Braun P., Chen E., Boeke J.D., Harlow E. Genetic characterization of a mammalian protein-protein interaction domain by using a yeast reverse two-hybrid system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;10321-10326.
38. Williamson J.R. Induced fit in RNA-protein recognition. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:2000;834-837.
39. Willis A.E. Translational control of growth factor and proto-oncogene expression. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31:1999;73-86.