Why are estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance so different?

Global Change Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 500-509

  Houghton, R A ^a  

^a WOODS HOLE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon balance; Carbon sink; Forest inventories; Global carbon budget; Land use change; Terrestrial ecosystems

Indexed keywords

CARBON BALANCE; CARBON SINK; DISTURBANCE; ESTIMATION METHOD; LAND USE CHANGE; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM;

EID: 0038643247     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00620.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Achard F, Eva HD, Stibig H-J et al. (2002) Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests. Science, 297, 999-1002.
2. Aumont O, Orr JC, Monfray P et al. (2001) Riverine-driven interhemispheric transport of carbon. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 15, 393-405.
3. Bacastow R, Keeling CD (1973) Atmospheric carbon dioxide and radio-carbon in the natural carbon cycle. II. Changes from A.D. 1700-2070 as deduced from a geochemical model. In: Carbon and the Biosphere (eds Woodwell GM, Pecan EV), pp. 86-135. US. Atomic Energy Commission, Symposium Series 30, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.
4. 2 in a mid-latitude forest. Science, 294, 1688-1691.
5. 13C. Science, 287, 2467-2470.
6. Billings WD (1990) Bromus tectorum, a biotic cause of ecosystem impoverishment in the Great Basin. In: The Earth in Transition, Patterns and Processes of Biotic Impoverishment (ed. Woodwell GM), pp. 301-322. Cambridge University Press, New York.
7. Caspersen JP, Pacala SW, Jenkins JC et al. (2000) Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in US forests. Science, 290, 1148-1151.
8. Clark D (2002) Are tropical forests an important carbon sink? Reanalysis of the long-term plot data. Ecological Applications, 12, 3-7.
9. 2 latitude gradient in recent decades. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 13, 821-826.
10. DeFries R, Houghton RA, Hansen M et al. (2002) Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 14256-14261.
11. 2 due to seasonal exchange with land biota. Nature, 376, 240-243.
12. FAO (2000) Assessing state and change in global forest cover: 2000 and beyond. Forest Resources Assessment Programme. Working Paper 31, FAO, Rome, Italy.
13. FAO (2001) Global forest resources assessment 2000. Main report. FAO Forestry Paper 140, Rome, Italy.
14. Fearnside PM (2000) Global warming and tropical land-use change: greenhouse gas emissions from biomass burning, decomposition and soils in forest conversion, shifting cultivation and secondary vegetation. Climatic Change, 46, 115-158.
15. Gaudinski JB, Trumbore SE, Davidson EA et al. (2000) Soil carbon cycling in a temperate forest: radiocarbon-based estimates of residence times, sequestration rates and partitioning of fluxes. Biogeochemistry, 51, 33-69.
16. Goodale CL, Apps MJ, Birdsey RA et al. (2002) Forest carbon sinks in the northern hemisphere. Ecological Applications, 12, 891-899.
17. Grace J, Lloyd J, McIntyre J et al. (1995) Carbon dioxide uptake by an undisturbed tropical rain forest in southwest Amazonia, 1992-1993. Science, 270, 778-780.
18. 2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models. Nature, 415, 626-630.
19. Houghton RA (in press) Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850-2000. Tellus.
20. Houghton RA, Hackler JL, Lawrence KT (1999) The US carbon budget: contributions from land-use change. Science, 285, 574-578.
21. 2 to the atmosphere. Ecological Monographs, 53, 235-262.
22. Houghton RA, Lawrence KT, Hackler JL et al. (2001) The spatial distribution of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: a comparison of estimates. Global Change Biology, 7, 731-746.
23. Houghton RA, Skole DL, Nobre CA et al. (2000) Annual fluxes of carbon from deforestation and regrowth in the Brazilian Amazon. Nature, 403, 301-304.
24. Hurtt GC, Pacala SW, Moorcroft PR et al. (2002) Projecting the future of the US carbon sink. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 1389-1394.
25. Jackson RB, Banner JL, Jobbágy EG et al. (2002) Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature, 418, 623-626.
26. Joos F, Prentice IC, House JI (2002) Growth enhancement due to global atmospheric change as predicted by terrestrial ecosystem models: consistent with US forest inventory data. Global Change Biology, 8, 299-303.
27. 2 transport based on observed winds: 1. analysis of observational data. In: Aspects of Climate Variability in the Pacific and the Western Americas (ed. Peterson DH), pp. 165-236. Geophysical Monograph 55, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.
28. 2 concentration. Nature, 381, 218-221.
29. Kurz WA, Apps MJ (1999) A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector. Ecological Applications, 9, 526-547.
30. Malhi Y, Nobre AD, Grace J et al. (1998) Carbon dioxide transfer over a central Amazonian rain forest. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 31593-31612.
31. Malhi Y, Phillips O, Kruijt B et al. (2001) The magnitude of the carbon sink in intact tropical forests: results from recent field studies. In: Sixth International Carbon Dioxide Conference, Extended Abstracts. pp. 360-363. Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
32. Miller SD, Goulden ML, Menton MC et al. (in press) Tower-based and biometry-based measurements of tropical forest carbon balance. Ecological Applications.
33. Monastersky R (1999) The case of the missing carbon dioxide. Science News, 155 (24), 383.
34. Pacala SW, Hurtt GC, Baker D et al. (2001) Consistent land-and atmosphere-based U.S. carbon sink estimates. Science, 292, 2316-2320.
35. Phillips OL, Malhi Y, Higuchi N et al. (1998) Changes in the carbon balance of tropical forests: evidence from long-term plots. Science, 282, 439-442.
36. Phillips OL, Malhi Y, Vinceti B et al. (2002) Changes in growth of tropical forests: evaluating potential biases. Ecological Applications, 12, 576-587.
37. Plattner G-K, Joos F, Stocker TF (2002) Revision of the global carbon budget due to changing air-sea oxygen fluxes. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16(4), 1096 (doi: 10.1029/ 2001GB001746).
38. Prentice IC, Farquhar GD, Fasham MJR et al. (2001) The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: Climate Change 2001: the Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ et al.), pp. 183-237. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
39. Rice AH, Pyle EH, Saleska SR et al. (in press) Carbon balance and vegetation dynamics in an old-growth Amazonian forest. Ecological Applications.
40. 2. Nature, 416, 617-620.
41. Saleska SR, Miller SD, Matross DM et al. (in review) Carbon fluxes in old-growth Amazonian rainforests: unexpected seasonality and disturbance-induced net carbon loss.
42. Sarmiento JL, Sundquist ET (1992) Revised budget for the oceanic uptake of anthropogenic carbon dioxide. Nature, 356, 589-593.
43. 2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems in the United States. Science, 287, 2004-2006.
44. 2. Nature, 411, 466-469.
45. 2. Global and Planetary Change, 26, 375-386.
46. Tucker CJ, Townshend JRG (2000) Strategies for monitoring tropical deforestation using satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 1461-1471.
47. Woodwell GM, Whittaker RH, Reiners WA et al. (1978) The biota and the world carbon budget. Science, 199, 141-146.