Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation: IV. Activation pattern for sinusoidal stimulation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 89, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 3190-3204

  Raggio, Marcia W ^a,b   Schreiner, Christoph E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CAT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; IMPLANTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY CORTEX; CATS; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; NEURONS; SENSORY DEPRIVATION;

EID: 0038617685     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00341.2002     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Battmer RD, Zilberman Y, Haake P, and Lenarz T. Simultaneous analog stimulation (SAS) - continuous interleaved sampler (CIS) pilot comparison study in Europe. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108: 69-73, 1999.
2. Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, and Leake PA. Psychophysical and central neuronal thresholds for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the cat. J Neurophysiol 83: 2145-2162, 2000a.
3. Beitel RE, Vollmer M, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, and Leake PA. Behavioral and neurophysiological thresholds for electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat. Audiol Neuro-Otol 5: 31-38, 2000b.
4. Bierer JA and Middlebrooks JC. Auditory cortical images of cochlearimplant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. J Neurophysiol 87: 478-492, 2002.
5. Blamey P, Arndt, P. Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, Larky, J. Lindstrom B, Nedzelski J, Peterson A, Shipp D, Staller S, and Whiftford L. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neuro-Otol 1: 293-306, 1996.
6. Chatterje M, Fu Q, and Shannon RV. Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 107: 1637-1644, 2000.
7. Cowan RS, Brown C, Whitford LA, Galvin KL, Sarant JZ, Barker EJ, Shaw S, King A, Skok M, Seligman PM, Dowell RC, Everingham C, and Gibson WPR. Speech perception in chilrden using the advanced Speak-speech-processing strategy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 166 (Suppl): 318-321, 1995.
8. Dawson PW, Blamey PJ, Rowland LC, Dettman SJ, Clark GM, Busby PA, Brown AM, Dowell RC, and Richards FW. Cochlear implants in children, adolescents and prelinguistically deafened adults: Speech perception. J Speech Hear Res 35: 401-417, 1992.
9. Dinse H, Godde B, Hilger T, Reuter G, Cords SM, Lenarz T, and von Seelen W. Optical imaging of cat auditory cortex cochleotopic selectivity evoked by acute electrical stimulation of a multi-channel cochlear implant. Eur J Neurosci 9: 113-119, 1997.
10. Glass I. Tuning characteristics of cochlear nucleus units in response to electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 12: 223-237, 1983.
11. Hartmann R and Klinke R. Impulse patterns of auditory nerve fibers to extra-and intracellular electrical stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 469 (Suppl): 128-134, 1990.
12. Hartmann R, Shepherd RK, Heid S, and Klinke R. Response of the primary auditory cortex to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in the congenitally deaf white cat. Hearing Res 112: 115-133, 1997.
13. Hartmann R, Topp G, and Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hearing Res 13: 47-62, 1984.
14. He J, Hashikawa T, Ojima H, and Kinouchi Y. Temporal integration and duration tuning in the dorsal zone of cat auditory cortex. J Neurosci 17: 2615-2625, 1997.
15. Heil P. Auditory cortical onset responses revisited. I. First-spike timing. J Neurophysiol 77: 2616-2641, 1997.
16. Heil, P. Rajan R, and Irvine DRF. Sensitivity of neurons in cat primary auditory cortex to tones and frequency-modulated stimuli. II. Organization of response properties along the 'isofrequency' dimension. Hearing Res 63: 135-156, 1992.
17. Hollow RD, Dowell RC, Cowan RSC, Skok MC, Pyman BC, and Clark GM. Continuing improvements in speech processing for adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 166: 292-294, 1995.
18. Klinke R, Kral A, Heid S, Tillein J, and Hartmann R. Recruitment of the auditory cortex in congenitally deaf cats by long-term cochlear electrostimulation. Science 285: 1729-1733, 1999.
19. Kral A, Hartmann R, Mortazavi D, and Klinke R. Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents. Hearing Res 121: 11-28, 1998.
20. Leake PA, Hradek GT, Rebscher SJ, and Snyder RL. Chronic intracochlear stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats. Hearing Res 54: 251-271, 1991.
21. Leake PA, Snyder RL, Rebscher SJ, Moore CM, and Vollmer M. Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single-vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness. Hear Res 147: 221-241, 2000.
22. Loeb G and Kessler, D, Speech recognition performance over time with the Clarion cochlear prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 104: 290-292, 1995.
23. Merzenich MM, Knight PL, and Roth GL. Representation of the cochlea within primary auditory cortex in the cat. J Neurophysiol 38: 231-249, 1975.
24. Middlebrooks JC and Bierer JA. Auditory cortical images of cochlearimplant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level. J Neurophysiol 87: 493-507, 2002.
25. Miller AL, Morris DJ, and Pfingst BE. Interactions between pulse separation and pulse polarity order in cochlear implants. Hearing Res 109: 21-33, 1997.
26. Miller AL, Smith DW, and Pfingst BE. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: 1. Sinusoidal stimuli. Hearing Res 134: 89-104, 1999.
27. Miller, LM, Escabi M, Read HL, and Schreiner CE. Spectro-temporal receptive fields in the lemniscal auditory thalamus and cortex. J Neurophysiol 87: 516-527, 2002.
28. Miyamoto RT, Osberger MJ, Todd SL, Robbins AM, Stroer BS, Zimmer-man-Phillips S, and Carney AE. Variables affecting implant performance in children. Laryngoscope 104: 1120-1124, 1994.
29. Moon AK, Zwolan TA, and Pfingst BE. Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea. Hearing Res 67: 166-178, 1993.
30. Morris DJ and Pfingst BE. Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1: 211-223, 2000.
31. Nadol JB, Young YS, and Glynn RJ. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 98: 411-416, 1989.
32. Osberger MJ and Fisher L. SAS-CIS preference study in postlingually deafened adults implnated with the clarion cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108: 74-79, 1999.
33. Osberger MJ, Fisher L, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Geier L, and Barker MJ. Speech recognition performance of older children with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 19: 152-157, 1998.
34. Pfingst BE and Morris DJ. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. II: Frequency and interpulse interval. J Acoust Soc Am 94: 1287-1294, 1993.
35. Pfingst BE, Sutton D, Miller JM, and Bohne BA. Cochlear implants: relation of psychophysical measures to histological findings. Acta Otolaryngol 92: 1-13, 1981.
36. Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Kwong B, and Masuda A. Auditory system plasticity in children after long periods of complete deafness. Neuroreport 8: 61-65, 1996.
37. Prieto J, Peterson B, and Winer J. Morphology and spatial distribution of GABAergic neurons in cat primary auditory cortex (Al). J Comp Neurol 344: 349-382, 1994.
38. Raggio M. Representations of electrical and acoustic cochlear stimulation in cat primary auditory cortex. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Francisco, 1992.
39. Raggio ME and Schreiner CE. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation: I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency. J Neurophysiol 72: 2334-2359, 1994.
40. Raggio ME and Schreiner CE. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation: III. Activation patterns in short- and long-term deafness. J Neurophysiol 72: 2334-2359, 1999.
41. Rajan R. Receptor organ damage causes loss of cortical surround inhibition without topographic map plasticity. Nature Neurosci 1: 138-143, 1998.
42. Read H, Winer JA, and Schreiner CE. Modular organization of intrinsic connections associated with spectral tuning in cat auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 8042-8047, 2001.
43. Rebscher SJ, Snyder RL, and Leake PA. The effects of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 109: 2035-2048, 2001.
44. Schreiner CE and Mendelson JR. Functional topography of cat primary auditory cortex: distribution of integrated excitation. J Neurophysiol 64: 1442-1459, 1990.
45. Schreiner CE, Mendelson JR, and Sutter ML. Functional topography of cat primary auditory cortex: representation of tone intensity. Exp Brain Res 92: 105-122, 1992.
46. Schreiner CE and Raggio MW. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. II. Repetition rate coding. J Neurophysiol 75: 1283-1300, 1996.
47. Schreiner CE, Read HL, and Sutter ML. Modular organization of frequency integration in primary auditory cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 23: 501-529, 2000.
48. Shannon RV. A model of threshold for pulsatile electrical stimulation of cochlear implants. Hearing Res 40: 197-204, 1989.
49. Shepherd RK and Javel E. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hearing Res 108: 112-144, 1997.
50. Shepherd RK, Hatsuhika S, and Clark GM. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effects of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 66: 108-120, 1993.
51. Shepherd RK, Hartmann R, Heid S, Hardie N, and Klinke R. The central auditory system and auditory deprivation: experience with cochlear implants in the congenitally deaf. Acta Otolaryngol (Suppl) 532: 28-33, 1997.
52. Skinner MW, Holden LK, Holden T, Demorest ME, and Fourakis MS. Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 101: 3766-3782, 1997.
53. Smith DW and Finley CC. Effects of electrode configuration on psychophyscial strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats. J Acoust Soc Am 102: 2228-2237, 1997.
54. Smith DW, Finley CC, van den Honert C, Olsyzk VB, and Konrad KE. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. 1. Absolute thresholds. Hear Res 81: 1-10, 1994.
55. Snik AFM, Vermeulen AM, Brokx JP, and van den Broek P. Long-term speech perception in children wtih cochlear implants compared wtih children with conventional hearing aids. Am J Otol 18: S129-S130, 1997.
56. Snyder RL, Rebscher SJ, Cao K, and Leake PA. Chronic intracochlear stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat: I. Expansion of central representation. Hearing Res 50: 7-33, 1990.
57. Stollwerck IE, Goodrum-Clarke K, Lynch C, Armstrong-Bednall G, Nunn T, Markoff L, Mens L, McAnallen C, Wei J, Boyle P, George C, and Zilberman V. Speech processing strategy preferences among 55 European CLARION cochlear implant users. Scand Audiol Suppl 52: 36-38, 2001.
58. Sutter ML and Schreiner CE. Topography of sensitivity and sharpness of intensity tuning in cat primary auditory cortex: single-neuron versus multiple-neuron recordings. J Neurophysiol 73: 190-204, 1995.
59. Sutter ML, Schreiner CE, McLean M, O'Connor KN, and Loftus WC. Organization of inhibitory frequency receptive fields in cat primary auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 82: 2358-2371, 1999.
60. Taniguchi I, Horikawa J, Hosokawa Y, and Nasu M. Optical imaging of neural activity in auditory cortex induced by intracochlear electrical stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 532 (Suppl): 83-88, 1997.
61. Tyler RS, Fryauf-Bertschy HJ, Kelsay DMR, Gantz BJ, Woodworth GP, and Parkinson A. Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117: 180-187, 1997.
62. Tyler RS, Gantz B, Woodworth G, Parkinson A, Lowder M, and Schum L. Initial independent results with the Clarion cochlear implant. Ear Hearing 17: 528-536, 1996.
63. van den Honert C and Stypulkowski PH. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings. Hearing Res 14: 225-243, 1984.
64. van den Honert C and Stypulkowski PH. Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli. Hearing Res 29: 207-222, 1987.
65. Volkov IO and Dembnovetskii OF. Cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats. J Neurophysiol 11: 117-124, 1979.
66. Vureck LS, White M, Fong M, and Walsh SM. Opto-isolated stimulators used for electrical evoked BSER. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 90 (82 Suppl): 21-24, 1981.
67. Waltzman S, Cohen NL, Gombolin RH, Green JE, Shapiro WH, Hoffman RA, and Roland JT. Open-set speech perception in congenitally deaf children using cochlear implants. Am J Otol 18: 342-349, 1997.
68. Wang J, Caspary DM, and Salvi RJ. GABA-A antagonist causes dramatic expansion of tuning in primary auditory cortex. Neuroreport 11: 1137-1140, 2000.
69. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, and Rabinowitz WM. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352: 236-238, 1991.
70. Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Zerbi M, Finley CC, and Wolford RD. New processing strategies in cochlear implants. Am J Otol 16: 669-675, 1995.
71. Xu S-A, Shepherd RK, Chen Y, and Clark GM. Profound hearing loss in the cat following the single co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Hearing Res 70: 205-215, 1993.