Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single- vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness

Hearing Research

Volumn 147, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 221-241

  Leake, Patricia A ^a   Snyder, Russell L ^a   Rebscher, Stephen J ^a   Moore, Charlotte M ^a   Vollmer, Maike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Altered central auditory representation; Auditory system development; Cochlear implant; Electrical stimulation; Neonatal deafness; Plasticity

Indexed keywords

AMINOOXYACETIC ACID; ETACRYNIC ACID; KANAMYCIN; NEOMYCIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TONOTOPY; TUNING CURVE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; CATS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HUMANS; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; NEURONAL PLASTICITY;

EID: 0033849332     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00133-7     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Aitkin L.M., Webster W.R., Veale J.C., Crosby D.C. Inferior colliculus. I. Comparison of response properties of neurons in central, pericentral and external nuclei of adult cat. J. Neurophysiol. 38:1975;1196-1207.
2. Altman L., Luhmann H.J., Greuel J.M., Singer W. Functional and neuronal binocularity in kittens raised with rapidly alternating binocular occlusion. J. Neurophysiol. 58:1987;965-980.
3. Blatchley B.J., Williams J.E., Coleman J.R. Age-dependent effects of acoustic deprivation on spherical cells of the rat anteroventral cochlear nucleus. Exp. Neurol. 80:1983;81-93.
4. Brugge J.F., O'Connor T.A. Postnatal functional development of the dorsal and posteroventral cochlear nuclei of the cat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75:1984;1548-1562.
5. Coleman J.R., O'Connor P. Effects of monaural and binaural sound deprivation on cell development in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of rat. Exp. Neurol. 64:1979;533-566.
6. Coleman J., Blatchley B.J., Williams J.E. Development of the dorsal and ventral cochlear nuclei in rat and effects of acoustic deprivation. Dev. Brain Res. 4:1982;119-123.
7. Cremieux J., Orban G.A., Duysens J., Amblad B. Response properties of area 17 neurons in cats reared in stroboscopic illumination. J. Neurophysiol. 57:1987;1511-1535.
8. Cynader M., Mitchell D.E. Prolonged sensitivity to monocular deprivation in dark-reared cats. J. Neurophysiol. 43:1980;1026-1040.
9. Dawson P.W., Clark G.M. Changes in synthetic and natural vowel perception after specific training for congenitally deafened patients using a multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 18:1997;488-501.
10. Dowell R.C., Blamey P.J., Clark G.M. Potential and limitations of cochlear implants in children. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Larnygol. 104:(Suppl. 166):1995;324-327.
11. Eggermont, J.J., Bock, G.R. (Eds.), 1986. Critical periods in auditory development. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) Suppl. 429, 1-64.
12. Eisele L.E., Schmidt J.T. Activity sharpens the regenerating retinotectal projections in goldfish: Sensitive period for strobe illumination and lack of effect on synaptogenesis and on ganglion cell receptive field properties. J. Neurobiol. 19:1988;395-411.
13. Evans J.W., Webster D.B., Cullen J.K. Jr. Auditory brainstem responses in neonatally sound deprived CBA/J mice. Hear. Res. 10:1983;269-277.
14. Feng A.S., Rogowski B.A. Effects of monaural and binaural occlusion on the morphology of neurons in the medial superior olivary nucleus of the rat. Brain Res. 189:1980;530-534.
15. Greenwood, D.D., 1974. Critical bandwidth in man and some other species in relation to the traveling wave envelope. In: Moskowitz, H.R., Stevens, J.C. (Eds.), Sensation and Measurement. Reidel, Boston, MA, pp. 231-239.
16. Greenwood D.D. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87:1990;2592-2605.
17. Harrison, R.V., Ibrahim, D., Stanton, S., Mount, R.J., 1996. Reorganization of frequency maps in chinchilla auditory midbrain after long-term basal cochlear lesions induced at birth. In: Salvi, R., Henderson, D., Fiorino, F., Colletti, V. (Eds.), Auditory System Plasticity and Regeneration. Thieme, New York, pp. 283-255.
18. Hartmann, R., Klinke, R., 1989. Response characteristics of nerve fibers to patterned electrical stimulation. In: Miller, J.M., Spelman, F.A. (Eds.), Cochlear Implants: Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 135-160.
19. Hartmann R., Topp G., Klinke R. Electrical stimulation of the cat cochlea: Discharge pattern of single auditory fibers. Adv. Audiol. 1:1984;18-29.
20. Hartmann R., Topp G., Klinke R. Single fiber recordings from the cat auditory nerve with electrical stimulation of the cochlea at different stimulation places. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 96:(Suppl. 128):1987;30-31.
21. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. J. Neurophysiol. 28:1965;1041-1059.
22. Irvine, D.R.F., Rajan, R., 1994. Plasticity of frequency organization in inferior colliculus of adult cats with unilateral restricted cochlear lesions. Abstr. 17th Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol., 21.
23. Javel E., Tong Y.C., Shepherd R.K., Clark G.M. Responses of cat auditory nerve fibers to biphasic electrical current pulses. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 96:(Suppl. 128):1987;26-30.
24. Jean-Baptist M., Morest D.K. Transneuronal changes of synaptic endings and nuclear chromatin in the trapezoid body following cochlear ablations in cats. J. Comp. Neurol. 162:1975;111-133.
25. Kiang N.Y.S., Moxon E.C. Physiological consideration in artificial stimulation of the inner ear. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 81:1972;714-730.
26. Kirk, K.I., 2000. Challenges in the clinical investigation of cochlear implant outcomes. In: Niparko, J.K. (Ed.), Kirk, K.I., Mellon, N.K., Robbins, A.M., Tucci, D.L., Wilson, B.S. (Co-Eds.), Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices. Lippencott-Raven, PA, pp. 225-259.
27. Kitzes, L., 1996. Anatomical and physiological changes in the brainstem induced by neonatal ablation of the cochlea. In: Salvi, R.J., Henderson, D. (Eds.), Auditory System Plasticity and Regeneration. Thieme Medical, New York, pp. 256-274.
28. Kitzes L., Semple S.M. Single unit responses in the inferior colliculus: Effects of neonatal unilateral cochlear ablation. J. Neurophysiol. 53:1985;1483-1500.
29. Langner G., Schreiner C.E. Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. J. Neurophysiol. 60:1988;1799-1822.
30. Leake-Jones P.A., Vivion M.C., O'Reilly B.F., Merzenich M.M. Deaf animal models for studies of a multichannel cochlear prosthesis. Hear. Res. 8:1982;225-246.
31. Leake P.A., Snyder R.L., Schreiner C.E. Cochlear pathology of sensorineural deafness in cats: Co-administration of kanamycin and aminooxyactetic acid. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 96:1987;48-50.
32. Leake P.A., Hradek G.T., Rebscher S.J., Snyder R.L. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion cells in neonatally deafened cats. Hear. Res. 54:1991;251-271.
33. Leake P.A., Snyder R.L., Hradek G.T., Rebscher S.J. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: Effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location. Hear. Res. 64:1992;99-117.
34. Leake P.A., Snyder R.L., Hradek G.T., Rebscher S.J. Consequences of chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats. Hear. Res. 82:1995;65-80.
35. Leake P.A., Kuntz A.L., Moore C.M., Chambers P.L. Cochlear pathology induced by aminoglycoside ototoxicity during postnatal maturation in cats. Hear. Res. 113:1997;117-132.
36. Leake P.A., Hradek G.T., Snyder R.L. Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear imlant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurrons after neonatal deafness. J. Comp. Neurol. 412:1999;543-562.
37. Leake, P.A., Snyder, R.L., Rebscher, S.J., Hradek, G.T., Moore, C.M., Vollmer, M., Sato, M., 2000. Long-term effects of deafness and chronic electrical stimulation of the cochlea. In: Waltzman, S.B., Cohen, N.L. (Eds.), Cochlear Implants. Thieme Medical, New York, pp. 31-41.
38. Liberman M.C. The cochlear frequency map for the cat: Labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:1982;1441-1449.
39. Lustig L.R., Leake P.A., Snyder R.L., Rebscher S.J. Changes in the cat cochlear nucleus following neonatal deafening and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 74:1994;29-37.
40. Matsushima J.-I., Shepherd R.K., Seldon H.L., Xu S.-A., Clark C.M. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in deaf kittens: effects on cochlear nucleus morphology. Hear. Res. 56:1991;133-142.
41. Merzenich M.M., Reid M.D. Representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus of the cat. Brain Res. 77:1974;397-415.
42. Mitchell, D.E., Timney, B., 1984. Postnatal development of function in the mammalian visual system. In: Darian-Smith, I. (Ed.), Handbook of Physiology, Vol. 3, Am. Physiol. Soc., Washington, D.C., pp. 507-555.
43. Moore D.R. Auditory brainstem of the ferret: Long survival following cochlear removal progressively changes projections from the cochlear nucleus to the inferior colliculus. J. Comp. Neurol. 339:1994;301-310.
44. Moore D.R., Irvine D.R. Plasticity of binaural interaction in the cat inferior colliculus. Brain Res. 208:1981;98-202.
45. Moore D.R., Kitzes L.M. Projections from the cochlear nucleus to the inferior colliculus in normal and neonatally cochlea-ablated gerbils. J. Comp. Neurol. 240:1985;180-195.
46. Moore D.R., Kowalchuk N.E. Auditory brainstem of the ferret: Effects of unilateral cochlear lesions in cochlear nucleus volume and projections to the inferior colliculus. J. Comp. Neurol. 272:1988;503-515.
47. Moore D.R., Hutchings M.E., King Q.J., Kowalchuk N.E. Auditory brain stem of the ferret: Some effects of rearing with a unilateral ear plug on the cochlea, cochlear nucleus and projections to the inferior colliculus. J. Neurosci. 9:1989;1213-1222.
48. Mower G.D., Cristen W.G. Role of visual experience in activating critical period in cat visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 53:1985;572-587.
49. Moxon, E.D., 1971. Neural and Mechanical Responses to Electric Stimulation of the Cat's Inner Ear. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
50. NIH Consensus Statement, 1995. Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children. Off. Med. App. Res., NIH, Bethesda, MD, 15-17 May; Vol. 13, pp. 1-30.
51. Niparko J.K., Finger P.A. Cochlear nucleus cell size changes in the Dalmatian: Model of congenital deafness. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 117:1997;229-235.
52. Nordeen K.W., Killackey H.P., Kitzes L.M. Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus following unilateral cochlear ablation in the neonatal gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. J. Comp. Neurol. 214:1983;144-153.
53. Parkins C.W. Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys. Hear. Res. 41:1989;137-168.
54. Powell T.P.S., Erulkar S.D. Transneuronal cell degeneration in the auditory relay nuclei of the cat. J. Anat. 96:1962;249-268.
55. Rose J.E., Greenwood D.D., Goldberg J.M., Hind J.E. Some discharge characteristics of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Tonotopic organization, relation of spike counts to tone intensity of firing patterns of single elements. J. Neurophysiol. 26:1966;294-320.
56. Roth G.L., Aikin L.M., Andersen R.A., Merzenich M.M. Some features of the spatial organization of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus of the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 182:1978;661-680.
57. Rubel, E.W., Born, D.E., Deitch, J.S., Durham, D., 1984. Recent advances toward understanding auditory system development. In: Berlin, C. (Ed.) Hearing Science. College-Hill Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 109-157.
58. Rubel E.W., Hyson R.L., Durham D. Afferent regulation of neurons in the brain stem auditory system. J. Neurobiol. 21:1990;169-196.
59. Ruben R.J. Unsolved issues around critical periods with emphasis on clinical application. Acta Otolaryngol. 429:(Suppl.):1986;61-64.
60. Ruben R.J., Rapin I. Plasticity of the developing auditory system. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 89:1980;303-311.
61. Russell R.A., Moore D.R. Afferent reorganization within the superior olivary complex of the gerbil: Development and induction by neonatal unilateral cochlear removal. J. Comp. Neurol. 352:1995;607-625.
62. Sato M., Leake P.A., Hradek G.T. Postnatal development of the organ of Corti in cats: A light microscopic morphometric study. Hear. Res. 127:1999;1-13.
63. Schreiner C.E., Langner G. Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. II. Topographical organization. J. Neurophysiol. 60:1988;1823-1840.
64. Shepherd R.K., Javel E. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hear. Res. 108:1997;112-144.
65. Shepherd R.K., Javel E. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fiber response properties. Hear. Res. 130:1999;171-188.
66. Silverman M.S., Clopton B.M. Plasticity of binaural interaction I. Effect of early auditory deprivation. J. Neurophysiol. 40:1977;1266-1274.
67. Snyder R.L., Rebscher S.J., Cao K., Leake P.A. Effects of chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I. Expansion of central spatial representation. Hear. Res. 50:1990;7-33.
68. Snyder R.L., Rebscher S.J., Leake P.A., Kelly K., Cao K. Chronic electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. II. Temporal properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus. Hear. Res. 56:1991;246-264.
69. Snyder R.L., Leake P.A., Rebscher S.J., Beitel R. Effects of neonatal deafening and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 73:1995;449-467.
70. Snyder R.L., Sinex D.G., McGee J.D., Walsh E.W. Acute spiral ganglion lesions change the tuning and topographic organization of inferior colliculus neurons. Hear. Res. 147:2000;200-220.
71. Stryker M.P., Strickland S.L. Physiological segregation of ocular dominance columns depends on the pattern of afferent electrical activity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 25:(Suppl.):1984;278.
72. Tieman D.G., Tumosa N., Tieman S.B. Behavioral and physiological effects of monocular deprivation: a comparison of rearing with diffusion and occlusion. Brain Res. 280:1983;41-50.
73. Tieman S.B., Tumosa N. Alternating monocular exposure increases the spacing of ocularity domains in area 17 of cats. Vis. Neurosci. 14:1997;929-938.
74. Trune D. Influence of neonatal cochlear removal on the development of mouse cochlear nucleus: Number, size and density of its neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 209:1982;409-424.
75. Tumosa N., Tieman S.B., Hirsch H.V.B. Unequal alternating monocular deprivation causes asymmetric visual fields in cats. Science. 208:1980;421-423.
76. van den Honert C., Stypulkowski P.H. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings. Hear. Res. 14:1984;225-243.
77. van Sluyters R.C., Livitt F.B. Experimental strabismus in the kitten. J. Neurophysiol. 43:1980;686-698.
78. Vollmer M., Snyder R.L., Leake P.A., Beitel R.E., Moore C.M., Rebscher S.J. Temporal properties of chronic cochlear electrical stimulation determine temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 82:1999;2883-2902.
79. Vurek L.S., White M., Fong M., Walsh S.M. Optoisolated stimulators used for electrically evoked BSER. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 90:(Suppl. 82):1981;21-24.
80. Walsh, E.J., McGee, J., 1986. The development of function in the auditory periphery. In: Altschuler, R.A., Hoffman, D.W., Bobbin, R.P. (Eds.), Neurobiology of Hearing: The Cochlea. Raven Press, New York, pp. 247-269.
81. Walsh, E.J., Romand, R., 1992. Functional development of the cochlea and the cochlear nerve. In: Romand, R. (Ed.), Development of Auditory and Vestibular Systems 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 161-219.
82. Walsh E.J., McGee J., Javel E. Development of auditory evoked potentials in the cat. I. Onset of response and development of sensitivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:1982;745-754.
83. Waltzman S.B., Shapiro W.H. Cochlear implants in children. Trends Amplification. 4:(4):1999;143-162.
84. Waltzman, S.B., 2000. Variables affecting speech perception in children. In: Waltzman, S.B., Cohen, N.L. (Eds.) Cochlear Implants. Thieme Medical, New York, pp. 199-206.
85. Webster D.B. Late onset of auditory deprivation does not affect brainstem auditory neuron soma size. Hear. Res. 12:1983;145-147.
86. Webster D.B. Conductive hearing loss affects the growth of the cochlear nuclei over an extended period of time. Hear. Res. 32:1988;185-192.
87. Webster D.B., Webster M. Neonatal sound deprivation affects brain stem auditory nuclei. Arch. Otolaryngol. 103:1977;392-396.
88. Webster D.B., Webster M. Effects of neonatal conductive hearing loss on brain stem auditory nuclei. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 88:1979;684-688.
89. Wiesel T.N., Hubel D.H. Effects of visual deprivation on morphology and physiology of cells in the cat's lateral geniculate body. J. Neurophysiol. 26:1963;978-993.
90. Wiesel T.N., Hubel D.H. Comparison of effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. J. Neurophysiol. 28:1965;1029-1040.
91. Weliky M., Katz L.C. Disruption of orientation tuning in visual cortex by artificially correlated neuronal activity. Nature. 386:1997;680-685.
92. Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., Lawson D.T., Wolford R.D., Eddington D.K., Rabinowitz W.M. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature. 352:1991;236-238.
93. Xu S.-A., Shepherd R.K., Chen Y., Clark G.M. Profound hearing loss in the cat following the single co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Hear. Res. 71:1993;205-215.