The central auditory system and auditory deprivation: Experience with cochlear implants in the congenitally deaf

Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Supplement

Volumn , Issue 532, 1997, Pages 28-33

  Shepherd, R K ^a   Hartmann, R ^b   Heid, S ^b   Hardie, N ^a   Klinke, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Cochlear implants; Congenital hearing loss; Deafness; Plasticity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; BRAIN STEM; CAT; CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONGENITAL DEAFNESS; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SPIRAL GANGLION; ANIMAL; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW;

ADULT; ANIMALS; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; CATS; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; HUMANS;

EID: 0030608721     PISSN: 03655237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016489709126141     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Robertson D, Irvine DRF. Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness. J Comp Neurol 1989; 282: 456-71.
2. Rajan R, Irvine DRF, Wise LZ, Heil P. Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex. J Comp Neurol 1993; 338: 17-49.
3. Recanzone GH, Schreiner CE, Merzenich MM. Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. J Neurosci 1993; 13: 87-103.
4. Rebillard G, Carlier E, Rebillard M, Pujol R. Enhancement of visual responses on the primary auditory cortex of the cat after an early destruction of cochlear receptors. Brain Res 1977; 129: 162-4.
5. Otte J, Schuknecht HF, Kerr AG. Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1978; 88: 1231-46.
6. Hinojosa R, Blough R, Mhoon E. Profound sensorineural deafness: A histopathologic study. Ann Otol Rhinol Larynol 1987; Suppl 128: 43-6.
7. Nadol JB Jr, Young YS, Glynn RJ. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98: 411-6.
8. Trune DR. Influence of neonatal cochlear removal on the development of mouse cochlear nucleus. I: Number, size, and density of its neurons. J Comp Neurol 1982; 209: 409-24.
9. Hashisaki GT, Rubel EW. Effects of unilateral cochlea removal on anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons in developing gerbils. J Comp Neurol 1989; 283: 5-73.
10. Moore DR. Auditory brainstem of the ferret: early cessation of developmental sensitivity of neurones in the cochlear nucleus to removal of the cochlea. J Comp Neurol 1990; 303: 2-15.
11. Nordeen KW, Killackey HP, Kitzes LM. Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus following unilateral cochlear ablation in the neonatal gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. J Comp Neurol 1983; 214: 144-53.
12. Moore DR. Auditory brainstem of the ferret: long survival following cochlear removal progressively changes projections from the cochlear nucleus to the inferior colliculus. J Comp Neurol 1994; 339: 301-10.
13. Reale RA, Brugge JF, Chan JCK. Maps of auditory cortex in cats reared after unilateral cochlear ablation in the neonatal period. Brain Res 1987; 431: 281-90.
14. Wong-Riley MTT, Merzenich MM, Leake PA. Changes in endogenous enzymatic reactivity to DAB induced by neuronal inactivity. Brain Res 1978; 141: 185-92.
15. Durham D, Rubel EW, Steel KP. Cochlear ablation in deafness mutant mice: 2-deoxyglucose analysis suggests no spontaneous activity of cochlear origin. Hear Res 1989; 43: 39-46.
16. Tucci DL, Rubel EW. Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: effects of conductive and sensorineural hearing loss on n. magnocellularis. J Comp Neurol 1985; 238: 371-81.
17. Moore DR, Hutchings ME, King AJ, Kowalchuk NE. Auditory brain stem of the ferret: some effects of rearing with a unilateral ear plug on the cochlea, cochlear nucleus, and projections to the inferior colliculus. J Neurosci 1989; 9: 1213-22.
18. Webster DB. Sound amplification negates central effects of a neonatal conductive hearing loss. Hear Res 1988; 32: 193-5.
19. Hyson RL, Rubel EW. Transneuronal regulation of protein synthesis in the brain-stem auditory system of the chick requires synaptic activation. J Neurosci 1989; 9: 2835-45.
20. Matsushima JI, Shepherd RK, Seldon HL, Xu SA, Clark GM. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in deaf kittens: effects on cochlear nucleus morphology. Hear Res 1991; 56: 133-42.
21. Lippe WR. Reduction and recovery of neuronal size in the cochlear nucleus of the chicken following aminoglycoside intoxication. Hear Res 1991; 51: 193-202.
22. McMullen NT, Glaser EM. Auditory cortical responses to neonatal deafening: pyramidal neuron spine loss without changes in growth or orientation. Exp Brain Res 1988; 72: 195-200.
23. Reale RA, Brugge JF, Chan JCK. Maps of auditory cortex in cats reared after unilateral cochlear ablation in the neonatal period. Brain Res 1987; 431: 281-90.
24. Kass JH. Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. Ann Rev Neurosci 1991; 14: 137-67.
25. Recanzone GH, Allard TT, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Receptive-field changes induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in SI of adult cats. J Neurophysiol 1990; 63: 1213-25.
26. Hartmann R, Shepherd RK, Heid S, Klinke R. Response of the primary auditory cortex to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in the congenitally deaf white cat. Hear Res 1997 (in press).
27. Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 1993; 66: 108-20.
28. Raggio MW, Schreiner CE. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency. J Neurophysiol 1994; 72: 2334-59.
29. Shepherd RK, Martin RL, Brown M, Clark GM. Spatial representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus of neonatally deafened kittens following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Proc Int Cochlear Implant Speech Hear Symp, Melbourne 1994: p. 263.
30. Lousteau RJ. Increased spiral ganglion cell survival in electrically stimulated, deafened guinea pig cochleae. Laryngoscope 1987; 97: 836-42.
31. Hartshorn DO, Miller JM, Altschuler RA. Protective effect of electrical stimulation in the deafened guinea pig cochlea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery 1991; 104: 311-9.
32. Leake PA, Hradek GT, Rebscher SJ, Snyder RL. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats. Hear Res 1991; 54: 251-71.
33. Shepherd RK, Matsushima J, Martin RL, Clark GM. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve II: Deafened kittens. Hear Res 1994; 81: 150-66.
34. Lustig LR, Leake PA, Snyder RL, Rebscher SJ. Changes in the cat cochlear nucleus following neonatal deafening and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation. Hear Res 1994; 74: 29-37.
35. Snyder RL, Rebscher SJ, Cao K, Leake PA, Kelly K. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation. Hear Res 1990; 50: 7-34.
36. Snyder RL, Leake PA, Rebscher S, Beitel R. Temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus to intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of neonatal deafening and chronic stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1995; 73: 449-67.
37. Raggio ME, Schreiner CE, Beitel RE, Leake PA. Alteration of response threshold distribution in cat primary auditory cortex with chronic electrical stimulation. ARO 1995; 18: 414.
38. Blarney PJ. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: Etiology, age and duration of deafness. NIH Consensus Development Conference Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children 1995; 15-20.
39. Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JL. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1978; Suppl 53: 5-39.
40. Tong YC, Busby PA, Clark GM. Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 951-62.
41. Busby PA, Tong YC, Clark GM. Psychophysical studies using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant in patients who were deafened early in life. Audiology 1992; 31: 95-111.
42. Beggs WDA, Foreman DL. Sound localization and early inaural experience in the deaf. B J Audiol 1980; 14: 41-8.
43. Brandes PJ, Ehinger DM. The effects of early middle ear pathology on auditory perception and academic achievement. J Speech Hear Dis 1981; 46: 301-6.
44. Hoffman-Lawless K, Keith RW, Cotton RT. Auditory processing abilities in children with previous middle ear effusion. Ann Otol 1981; 90: 543-5.
45. Sak RJ, Ruben RJ. Recurrent middle ear effusion in childhood: implications of temporary auditory deprivation for language and learning. Ann Otol 1981; 90: 546-51.
46. Dowell RC, Blarney PJ, Clark GM. Potential and limitations of cochlear implants in children. Ann Otol Rhino Laryn 1995; Suppl 166: 324-7.
47. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Cochlear Implants. JAMA 274: 1955-61.
48. Hari R, Pelizzone M, Makela JP, Hällström J, Huttunen J, Knuutila J. Neuromagnetic responses from a deaf subject to stimuli presented through a multichannel cochlear prosthesis. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 148-52.
49. Ito J, Sakakibara J, Iwasaki Y, Yonekura Y. Positron emission tomography of auditory sensation in deaf patients and patients with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102: 797-801.
50. Herzog H, Lamprecht A, Kuhn A, Roden W, Vosteen K-H, Feinendegen LE. Cortical activation in profoundly deaf patients during cochlear implant stimulation demonstrated by H2(15)O PET. J Comp Ass Tomog 1991; 15: 369-75.