Ab initio modelling of the N-terminal domain of the secretin receptors

Computational Biology and Chemistry

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 103-114

  Taylor, William R ^a   Munro, Robin E J ^a,d   Petersen, Kjell ^b   Bywater, Robert P ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c NOVO NORDISK A S   (Denmark)

^d Axaron Bioscience AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ab initio folding; Disulphide bridge; G protein coupled receptor; GLP1 receptor; Secretin family

Indexed keywords

HORMONES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MUTAGENESIS;

DISULFIDE BRIDGE;

PROTEINS;

CYSTEINE; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; GLUCAGON; HORMONE RECEPTOR; SECRETIN RECEPTOR; TRYPTOPHAN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CYSTEINE; GLUCAGON; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED; RECEPTORS, GASTROINTESTINAL HORMONE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; TRYPTOPHAN;

EID: 0038348418     PISSN: 14769271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1476-9271(03)00020-3     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schäffer A.A., Zhang J.H., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:1997;3389-3402.
2. Aszódi A., Taylor W.R. Folding polypeptide α-carbon backbones by distance geometry methods. Biopolymers. 34:1994;489-506.
3. Aszódi A., Taylor W.R. Secondary structure formation in model polypeptide chains. Protein Eng. 7:1994;633-644.
4. Aszódi A., Gradwell M.J., Taylor W.R. Protein fold determination using a small number of distance restraints. Bohr H., Brunak S. Protein Folds: A Distance Based Approach. 1995;85-97 CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
5. Buggy J.J., Livingston J.N., Rabin D.U., Yoo-Warren H. Glucagon:glucagon-like peptide I receptor chimeras reveal domains that determine specificity of glucagon binding. J. Biol. Chem. 270:1995;7474-7478.
6. Chalaoux F.R., O'Donoghue S.I., Nilges M. Molecular dynamics and accuracy of NMR structures: effects of error bounds and data removal. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 34:1999;453-463.
7. De Groot B.L., Van Aalten D.M.F., Scheek R.M., Amadei A., Vriend G., Berendsen H.J.C. Prediction of protein conformational freedom from distance constraints. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 29:1997;240-251.
8. DeAlmeida V.I., Mayo K.E. Identification of binding domains of the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor by analysis of mutant and chimeric receptor proteins. Mol. Endocrinol. 12:1998;750-765.
9. Debe D.A., Carlson M.J., Sadanobu J., Chan S.I., Goddard W.A. III. Protein fold determination from sparse distance constraints: the restrained generic protein direct Monte Carlo method. J. Phys. Chem. B103:1999;3001-3008.
10. Di Paolo E., De Neef P., Moguilevsky N., Petry H., Bollen A., Waelbroeck M., Robberecht P. Contribution of the second transmembrane helix of the secretin receptor to the positioning of secretin. FEBS Lett. 424:1998;207-210.
11. Frimurer T.M., Bywater R.P. Structure of the integral membrane domain of the GLP1 receptor. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 35:1999;375-386.
12. Grauschopf U., Lilie H., Honold K., Wozny M., Reusch D., Esswein A., Schfer W., Rcknagel K.P., Rudolph R. The N-terminal fragment of human parathyroid hormone receptor I constitutes a hormone binding domain and reveals a distinct disulfide pattern. Biochemistry. 39:2000;8878-8887.
13. Graziano M.P., Hey P.J., Strader C.D. The amino terminal domain of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor is a critical determinant of subtype specificity. Recept. Channels. 4:1996;9-17.
14. Horn F., Bywater R.P., Krause G., Kuipers W.L.O., Paiva A.C.M., Sander C., Vriend G. The interaction of class b g-protein-coupled receptors with their hormones. Recept. Channels. 5:1998;305-314.
15. Horn F., Weare J., Beukers M.W., Horsch S., Bairoch A., Chen W., Edvardsen F., Campagne F., Vriend G. GPCRDB: an information system for G protein-coupled receptors. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:1998;275-279.
16. Jones D.T. GENTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 287:1999;797-815.
17. Jones D.T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292:1999;195-202.
18. Jones D.T. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics. 16:2000;404-405.
19. King R.D., Sternberg M.J.E. Identification and application of the concepts important for accurate and reliable protein secondary structure prediction. Protein Sci. 5:1996;2298-2310.
20. Kneller D.G., Cohen F.E., Langridge R. Improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by an enhanced neural network. J. Mol. Biol. 214:1990;171-182.
21. Lins L., Covineau A., Rouyer-Fessard C., Nicole P., Maoret J.J., Benhamed M., Brasseur R., Thomas A., Laburthe M. The human VPAC1 receptor: three dimensional model and mutagenisis of the n-terminal domain. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;10153-10160.
22. Lund O., Hansen J., Brunak S., Bohr J. Relationship between protein structure and geometrical constraints. Protein Sci. 5:1996;2217-2225.
23. Munro, R.E.J., 1999. Protein Structure Prediction and Modelling. Ph.D. thesis, Laboratory of Mathematical Biology, National Institute for Medical Research (MRC), London, affiliated to University College, University of London.
24. Oliveira L., Paiva A.C.M., Sander C., Vriend G. A common step for signal transduction in G protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 15:1994;170-172.
25. Pazos F., Helmer-Citterich M., Ausiello G., Valencia A. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 271:1997;511-523.
26. Petersen K., Taylor W.R. Modelling zinc-binding proteins with GADGET: genetic algorithm and distance geometry for exploring topology. J. Mol. Biol. 325:2003;1039-1059.
27. Pollock D.D., Taylor W.R. Effectiveness of correlation analysis in identifying protein residues undergoing correlated evolution. Protein Eng. 10:1997;647-657.
28. Pollock D.D., Taylor W.R., Goldman N. Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J. Mol. Biol. 287:1999;187-198.
29. Qi L.J., Leung A.T., Xiong Y.T., Marx K.A., Abou-Samra A.B. Extracellular cysteines of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor are critical for ligand binding. Biochemistry. 36:1997;12442-12448.
30. Richardson J.S. β-Sheet topology and the relatedness of proteins. Nature. 268:1977;495-500.
31. Rost B., Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70-percent accuracy. J. Mol. Biol. 232:1993;584-599.
32. Salamov A.A., Solovyev V.V. Prediction of protein secondary structure by combining nearest-neighbor algorithms and multiple sequence alignments. J. Mol. Biol. 247:1995;11-15.
33. Shindyalov I.N., Kolchanov N.A., Sander C. Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations. Protein Eng. 7:1994;349-358.
34. Taylor W.R. A flexible method to align large numbers of biological sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 28:1988;161-169.
35. Taylor W.R. Residual colours: a proposal for aminochromography. Protein Eng. 10:1997;743-746.
36. Taylor W.R. Dynamic databank searching with templates and multiple alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 280:1998;375-406.
37. Taylor W.R. A deeply knotted protein and how it might fold. Nature. 406:2000;916-919.
38. Taylor W.R. A periodic table for protein structure. Nature. 416:2002;657-660.
39. Taylor W.R., Brown N.P. QUEST: an iterated sequence databank search method. Suhai S. Genomics and Proteonomics: Functional and Computational Aspects. 2000;67-82 Kluwer Academy/Plenum Press.
40. Taylor W.R., Hatrick K. Compensating changes in protein multiple sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 7:1994;341-348.
41. Taylor W.R., Jones D.T. Modelling and predicting α-helical trans-membrane structures. Bohr H., Brunak S. Protein Folds: a Distance Based Approach. 1995;283-293 CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
42. Taylor W.R., Heringa J., Baud F., Flores T.P. A Fourier analysis of symmetry in protein structure. Protein Eng. 15:2002;79-89.
43. Van Eyll B., Göke B., Wilmen A., Göke R. Exchange of W39 by a within the N-terminal extracellular domain of the GLP-1 receptor results in a loss of receptor function. Peptides. 17:1996;565-570.
44. Vilardaga J.P., De Neef R., Di Paolo E., Bollen A., Waelbroeck M., Robberecht P. Properties of chimeric secretin and vip receptor proteins indicate the importance of the N-terminal domain for ligand discrimination. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 211:1995;885-891.
45. Vilardaga J.P., Di Paolo E., Bialek C., De Neef P., Waelbroeck M., Bollen A., Robberecht P. Mutational analysis of extracellular cysteine residues of rat secretin receptor shows that disulfide bridges are essential for receptor function. Eur. J. Biochem. 246:1997;173-180.
46. Vriend G. WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J. Mol. Graph. 8:1990;52-56.
47. Wilmen A., Göke B., Göke R. The isolated N-terminal extracellular domain of the glucagon-like peptide-1. FEBS Lett. 398:1996;43-47.
48. Wilmen A., Van Eyll B., Göke B., Göke R. Five out of six tryptophan residues in the N-terminal extracellular domain of the rat GLP-1 receptor are essential for its ability to bind GLP-1. Peptides. 18:1997;301-305.