The demand bargaining set: General characterization and application to majority games

Games and Economic Behavior

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 137-155

  Morelli, Massimo ^a   Montero, Maria ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bargaining sets; Majority games; Proportional payoffs; Stable demands; Undominated coalition structures

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038066585     PISSN: 08998256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0899-8256(02)00532-8     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Albers, W, 1974. Zwei Lösungkonzepte für Kooperative Mehrpersonenspiele, die auf Anspruchsniveaus der Spieler Basieren. OR-Verfahren (Methods Oper. Res.) 21, 1-13.
2. Aumann, R.J., Drèze, J.H., 1974. Cooperative games with coalition structures. Int. J. Game Theory 3, 217-237.
3. Aumann, R., Maschler, M., 1964. The bargaining set for cooperative games. In: Dresher, M., Shapley, L.S., Tucker, A.W (Eds.), Advances in Game Theory. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, pp. 443-476.
4. Bennett, E., 1983. The aspirations approach to predicting coalition formation and payoff distribution in side payment games. Int. J. Game Theory 12, 1-28.
5. Bennett, E., 1985. Exogenous vs. endogenous coalition formation. Econ. Appl. 37, 611-635.
6. Cross, J., 1967. Some theoretical characteristics of economic and political coalitions. J. Conflict Resolution 11, 184-195.
7. Davis, M., Maschler, M., 1965. The kernel of a cooperative game. Naval Res. Logist. Quar. 12, 223-259.
8. Davis, M., Maschler, M., 1967. Existence of stable payoff configurations for cooperative games. In: Shubik, M. (Ed.), Essays in Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern. Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 39-52.
9. Granot, D., Maschler, M., 1997. The reactive bargaining set: Structure, dynamics, and extension to NTU games. Int. J. Game Theory 26, 75-95.
10. Maschler, M., 1992. The bargaining set, kernel, and nucleolus. In: Aumann, R., Hart, S. (Eds.), Handbook Game Theory Appl., pp. 591-667.
11. Mas-Colell, A., 1989. An equivalence result for a bargaining set. J. Math. Econ. 18, 129-138.
12. Morelli, M., 1999. Demand competition and policy compromise in legislative bargaining. Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. 93, 809-820.
13. Morelli, M., Montero, M., 2001. The stable demand set: General characterization and application to weighted majority games. Ohio State University Working Paper 0103.
14. (i). In: Shubik, M. (Ed.), Essays in Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern. Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 53-56.
15. Peleg, B., 1968. On weights of constant sum majority games. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 16, 527-532.
16. Pérez-Castrillo, D., Wettstein, D., 2000. Implementation of bargaining sets via simple mechanisms. Games Econ. Behav. 31, 106-120.
17. Sudhölter, P., Potters, J.A.M., 2001. The semireactive bargaining set of a cooperative game. Int. J. Game Theory 30, 117-139.
18. Selten, R., 1981. A non-cooperative model of characteristic function bargaining. In: Böhm, V., Nachtkamp, H. (Eds.), Essays in Game Theory and Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oscar Morgenstern. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, pp. 131-151.
19. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O., 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton NJ.
20. Warwick, P.V, Druckman, J.N., 2001. Portfolio salience and the proportionality of payoffs in coalition governments. British J. Polit. Sci. 31, 627-649.
21. Zhou, L., 1994. A new bargaining set of an N-person game and endogenous coalition formation. Games Econ. Behav. 6, 512-526.