When tactics collide: Counter effects between an adjunct map and prequestions

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 17-39

  Kealy, William A ^a   Bakriwala, Darshan J ^a   Sheridan, Philip B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037821646     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02504524     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Abel, R.R., & Kulhavy, R.W. (1986). Maps, mode of text presentation, and children's prose learning. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 263-274.
2. Abel, R.R., & Kulhavy, R.W. (1989). Associating map features and related prose in memory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 33-48.
3. Amlund, J.T., Gafney, J., & Kulhavy, R.W. (1985). Map feature content and text recall of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17(4), 317-330.
4. Anderson, R.C. (1982). Allocation of attention during reading. In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 292-305). New York: North Holland.
5. Andersen, R.C., & Biddle, W.B. (1975). On asking people questions about what they are reading. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 89-132). New York: Academic Press.
6. Andrews, D.H., & Goodson, L.A. (1995). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. In G.J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (3rd ed., pp. 161-182). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
7. Authorware 4.0.2 [Computer software]. (1997). San Francisco, CA: Macromedia.
8. Cudeck, R. & Hulin, C. (2001). Measurement: Cronbach's alpha on two-item scales. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(1&2), 55-69.
9. Dean, R.S., & Kulhavy, R.W. (1981). Influence of spatial organization in prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 57-64.
10. Dick W., & Carey, L. (1990). The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
11. Fleming, M.L. (1987). Displays and communication. In R.M. Gagné (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 233-260). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Gagné, R.M. (1988). Principles of instructional design (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
13. Griffin, M.M., & Robinson, D.H. (2000). Role of mimeticism and spatiality in textual recall. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 125-149.
14. Hamaker, C. (1986). The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 212-242.
15. Ho, C.P. (1989). Pictures and questions as adjuncts in text. International Journal of Instructional Media, 16(2), 143-155.
16. Howell, D.C. (1982). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: PWS Publishers.
17. Kealy, W.A., & Sivo, S.A. (1993, January). Effect of prior knowledge on familiarity ratings of geographic forms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX.
18. Kealy, W.A., & Sullivan, H.J. (1991). Question density and processing attention in computer-based instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 230-232.
19. Kulhavy, R.W., Lee, J.B., & Caterino, L.C. (1985). Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 28-37.
20. Kulhavy, R.W., Schwartz, N.H., & Peterson, S.E. (1986). Working memory: The instructional encoding process, In G.D. Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning: Understanding, thinking, and problem solving (pp. 83-113). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
21. Kulhavy, R.W., Schwartz, N.H., & Shaha, S.H. (1983). Spatial representation of maps. American Journal of Psychology, 96, 337-351.
22. Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W.A., & Kealy, W.A. (1993). How geographic maps increase recall of instructional text. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 41 (4), 47-62.
23. Larkin, J.H., & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
24. Leshin, C.B., Pollock, J., & Reigeluth, C.M. (1992). Instructional design strategies and tactics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
25. MacLeish, W.H. (1991, November). From sea to shining sea: 1492. Smithsonian, 22, 34-46.
26. Mastropieri, M.A., & Peters, E.E. (1987). Increasing prose recall of learning disabled and reading disabled students via spatial organizers. Journal of Educational Research, 80(5), 272-276.
27. Mayer, R.E. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 141-159). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
28. Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Mayer, R.E. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 89, 55-71.
30. Meier, B., & Graf, P. (2000). Transfer appropriate processing for prospective memory tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 11-27.
31. Meyer, B.J.F., & McConkie, G.W. (1973). What is recalled after hearing a passage? Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 109-117.
32. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Moore, P.J., & Scevak, J.J. (1988, December). Spatial aids and comprehension: The effects of ability, preference, and instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Tucson, AZ.
34. Noble, C.E. (1952). An analysis of meaning. Psychological Review, 59, 421-430.
35. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.). (1983). Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.). (1986). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Rittschof, K.A., Stock, A.A., Kulhavy, R.W., Verdi, M.P., & Doran, J.M. (1994). Thematic maps improve memory for facts and inferences: A test of the stimulus order hypothesis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 129-142.
39. Ross, S.M., & Morrison, G.R. (1996). Experimental research methods. In D.H. Jonnassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1148-1170). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
40. Sadoski, M., Kealy, W.A., Goetz, E.T., & Paivio, A. (1997). Concreteness and imagery effects in the written composition of definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 518-526.
41. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Schwartz, N.H., Ellsworth, L.S., Graham, L., & Knight, B. (1998). Accessing prior knowledge to remember text: A comparison of advance organizers and maps. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 65-89.
43. Schwartz, N.H., & Kulhavy, R.W. (1981). Map features and the recall of discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 151-158.
44. Snowman, J. (1986). Learning tactics and strategies. In G.D. Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom Learning: Understanding, thinking, and problem solving (pp. 243-275). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
45. Thorndyke, P.W., and Stasz, C. (1980). Individual differences in procedures for knowledge acquisition from maps. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 137-175.
46. Verdi, M.P., Johnson, J.T., & Stock, W.A. (1997). Organized spatial displays and texts: Effects of presentation order and display type on learning outcomes. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 303-317.
47. Verdi, M.P., & Kulhavy, R.W. (2002). Learning with maps and texts: An overview. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 27-46.
48. West, C.K., Farmer, J.A., & Wolff, P.M. (1991). Instructional design: Implications from cognitive science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
49. Winn, W.D. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 211-247.