Role of mimeticism and spatiality in textual recall

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 125-149

  Griffin, Marlynn M ^a   Robinson, Daniel H ^b  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037820089     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.0997     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abel R. R., Kulhavy R. W. Maps, mode of text presentation, and children's prose learning. American Educational Research Journal. 23:1986;263-274.
2. Arici, A, Schreiber, J, &, Kulhavy, R. 1998, Using maps to facilitate the recall of associated text. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
3. Baddeley A. Is working memory working? The Fifteenth Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 44a:1992;1-31.
4. Bertin J. Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps. 1983;Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
5. Darch C., Gersten R. Direction-setting activities in reading comprehension: A relation of two approaches. Learning Disabled Quarterly. 9:1986;235-423.
6. Das J. P., Kirby J. R., Jarman R. F. Simultaneous and successive cognitive processes. 1979;Academic Press, New York.
7. Kintsch W., Mandel T. S., Kozminsky E. Summarizing scrambled stories. Memory & Cognition. 5:1977;547-552.
8. Kruley P., Sciama S. C., Glenberg A. M. On-line processing of textual illustrations in the visuospatial sketchpad: Evidence from dual-task studies. Memory & Cognition. 22:1994;261-272.
9. Kulhavy R. W., Lee J. B., Caterino L. C. Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 10:1985;28-37.
10. Kulhavy R. W., Stock W. A. How cognitive maps are learned and remembered. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 86:1996;123-145.
11. Kulhavy R. W., Stock W. A., Peterson S. E., Pridemore D. R., Klein J. D. Using maps to retrieve text: A test of conjoint retention. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 17:1992;56-70.
12. Kulhavy R. W., Stock W. A., Verdi M. P., Rittschof K. A., Savenye W. Why maps improve memory for text: The influence of structural information on working memory operations. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 5:1993a;375-392.
13. Kulhavy R. W., Stock W. A., Woodard T. A., Haygood R. C. Comparing elaboration and dual coding theories: The case of maps and text. American Journal of Psychology. 106:1993b;483-498.
14. Kulhavy R. W., Woodard K. A., Haygood R. C., Webb J. M. Using maps to remember text: An instructional analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 63:1993c;162-169.
15. Larkin J. H., Simon H. A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science. 11:1987;65-69.
16. Levie W. H. Research on pictures: A guide to the literature. Willows D. M., Houghton H. A. The psychology of illustration: Basic research. 1987;1-50 Springer-Verlag, New York.
17. Paivio A. Mental representation: A dual coding approach. 1986;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
18. Robinson D. H., Katayama A. D., Fan A. Evidence for conjoint retention of information encoded from spatial adjunct displays. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 21:1996;221-239.
19. Robinson D. H., Kiewra K. A. Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology. 87:1995;455-467.
20. Schwartz N. H., Kulhavy R. W. Map features and the recall of discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 6:1981;151-158.
21. Schwartz N. H., Phillippe A. E. Individual differences in the retention of maps. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 16:1991;1-12.
22. Stock W. A., Kulhavy R. W., Peterson S. E., Hancock T. E., Verdi M. P. Mental representations of maps and verbal descriptions: Evidence they effect text processing differently. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 19:1995;237-256.
23. Tippett L. J. The generation of visual images: A review of neurological research and theory. Psychological Bulletin. 112:1992;415-432.