Predicting the topology of transmembrane helical proteins using mean burial propensity and a hidden-Markov-model-based method

Protein Science

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1547-1555

  Zhou, Hongyi ^a   Zhou, Yaoqi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Burial propensity; Hydrophobicity scale; Topology prediction; Transmembrane protein topology

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN; TRANSMEMBRANE HELICAL PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DATA BASE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THUMBUP ALGORITHM;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACIDS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; MARKOV CHAINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0037633968     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.0305103     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Argos, P., Rao, J.K., and Hargrave, P.A. 1982. Structural prediction of membrane-bound proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 128: 565-575.
2. Bairoch, A. and Apweiler, R. 2000. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data-base and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 45-48.
3. Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T.N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I.N., and Bourne, P. 2000. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 235-242.
4. Boyd, D., Schierle, C., and Beckwith, J. 1998. How many membrane proteins are there? Protein Sci. 7: 201-205.
5. Chen, C.P., Kernytsky, A., and Rost, B. 2002. Transmembrane helix predictions revisited. Protein Sci. 11: 2774-2791.
6. Chothia, C. 1976. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 105: 1-14.
7. Claros, M. and von Heijne, G. 1994. TopPred II: An improved software for membrane protein structure predictions. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10: 685-686.
8. Cserzo, M., Wallin, E., Simon, I., von Heijne, G., and Elofsson, A. 1997. Prediction of transmembrane α-helices in prokaryotic membrane proteins: The dense alignment surface method. Protein Eng. 10: 673-676.
9. Deber, C., Wang, C., Liu, L., Prior, A., Agrawal, S., Muskat, B., and Cuticchia, A. 2001. TM finder: A prediction program for transmembrane protein segments using a combination of hydrophobicity and nonpolar phase helicity scales. Protein Sci. 10: 212-219.
10. Degli Esposti, M., Crimi, M., and Venturoli, G. 1990. A critical evaluation of the hydropathy profile of membrane proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 190: 207-219.
11. Drew, D., Sjostrand, D., Nielsen, J., Urbig, T., Chin, C., de Gier, J., and von Heijne, G. 2002. Rapid topology mapping of Escherichia coli inner-membrane proteins by prediction and PhoA/GFP fusion analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 2690-2695.
12. Edelman, J. 1993. Quadratic minimization of predictors for protein secondary structure: Application to transmembrane α helices. J. Mol. Biol. 232: 165-191.
13. Edelman, J. and White, S.H. 1989. Linear optimization of predictors for secondary structure. Application to trans-bilayer segments of membrane proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 210: 195-209.
14. Eilers, M., Shekar, S.C., Shieh, T., Smith, S.O., and Fleming, P.J. 2000. Internal packing of helical membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 5796-5801.
15. Eilers, M., Patel, A.B., Liu, W., and Smith, S.O. 2002. Comparison of helix interactions in membrane and soluble α-bundle proteins. Biophys. J. 82: 2720-2736.
16. Eisenberg, D., Weiss, R.M., Terwilliger, T.C., and Wilcox, W. 1982. Hydrophobic moments and protein structure. Faraday Symp. Chem. Soc. 17: 109-120.
17. Engelman, D.M., Steitz, T.A., and Goldman, A. 1986. Identifying nonpolar trans-bilayer hences in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 15: 321-353.
18. Hartmann, E., Rapaport, T.A., and Lodish, H.F. 1989. Predicting the orientation of eukayotic membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 86: 5786-5790.
19. Hirokawa, T., Boon-Chieng, S., and Mitaku, S. 1998. SOSUI: Classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 14: 378-379.
20. Hobohm, U., Scharf, M., Schneider, R., and Sander, C. 1992. Selection of representative protein data sets. Protein Sci. 1: 409-417.
21. Ikeda, M., Arai, M., Lao, D.M., and Shimizu, T. 2002. Transmembrane topology prediction methods: A re-assessment and improvement by a consensus method using a dataset of experimentally-characterized transmembrane topologies. In Silico Biol. 2: 19-33.
22. Jayasinghe, S., Hristova, K., and White, S.H. 2001a. MPtopo: A database of membrane protein topology. Protein Sci. 10: 455-458.
23. -. 2001b. Energetics, stability, and prediction of transmembrane helices. J. Mol. Biol. 312: 927-934.
24. Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R., and Thornton, J.M. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358: 86-89.
25. -. 1994. A model recognition approach to the prediction of all-helical membrane protein structure and topology. Biochemistry 33: 3038-3049.
26. Juretic, D., Zoranić, L., and D. Zucić 2002. Basic charge clusters and predictions of membrane protein topology. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42: 620-632.
27. Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G., and Sonnhammer, E.L.L. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: Application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 305: 567-580.
28. Kyte, J. and Doolittle, R.F. 1982. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157: 105-132.
29. Lee, B. and Richards, F.M. 1971. The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55: 379-400.
30. Möller, S., Kriventseva, E.V., and Apweiler, R. 2000. A collection of well characterized integral membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 16: 1159-1160.
31. Möller, S., Croning, M.D.R., and Apweiler, R. 2001. Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions. Bioinformatics 17: 646-653.
32. Nakai, K. and Kanehisa, M. 1992. A knowledge base for predicting protein localization sites in eukaryotic cells. Genomics 14: 897-911.
33. Nielsen, H., Engelbrecht, J., Brunak, S., and von Heijne, G. 1997. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 10: 1-6.
34. Persson, B. and Argos, P. 1996. Topology prediction of membrane proteins. Protein Sci. 5: 363-371.
35. Punta, M. and Maritan, A. 2003. A knowledge-based scale for amino acid membrane propensity. Proteins 50: 114-121.
36. Rabiner, L.R. and Juang, B.H. 1993. Fundamentals of speech recognition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
37. Rose, G.D., Geselowitz, A.R., Lesser, G.J., Lee, R.H., and Zehfus, M.H. 1985. Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular protein. Science 229: 834-838.
38. Rost, B., Casadio, R., Fariselli, P., and Sander, C. 1995. Transmembrane helices predicted at 95% accuracy. Protein Sci. 4: 521-533.
39. Rost, B., Casadio, R., and Fariselli, P. 1996. Refining neural network predictions for helical transmembrane proteins by dynamic programming. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 4: 192-200.
40. Shrake, A. and Rupley, J.A. 1973. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. J. Mol. Biol. 79: 351-371.
41. Stevens, T.J. and Arkin, I.T. 2000. Do more complex organisms have a greater proportion of membrane proteins in their genomes? Proteins 39: 417-420.
42. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
43. Traxler, B., Boyd, D., and Beckwith, J. 1993. The topological analysis of integral cytoplasmic membrane proteins. J. Membr. Biol. 132: 1-11.
44. Tusnády, G. and Simon, I. 1998. Principles governing amino acid composition of integral membrane proteins: Application to topology prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 283: 489-506.
45. von Heijne, G. 1986. The distribution of positively charged residues in bacterial inner membrane proteins correlates with the trans-membrane topology. EMBO J. 5: 3021-3027.
46. -. 1992. Membrane protein structure prediction: Hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. J. Mol. Biol. 225: 487-494.
47. -. 1994. Membrane proteins: From sequence to structure. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 23: 167-192.
48. Wallin, E. and von Heijne, G. 1998. Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms. Protein Sci. 7: 1029-1038.
49. White, S.H. 1994. Hydropathy plots and the prediction of membrane protein topology. In Membrane protein structure: Experimental approaches (ed. S.H. White), pp. 97-124. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
50. Zhou, H. and Zhou, Y. 2002. The stability scale and atomic solvation parameters extracted from 1023 mutation experiments. Proteins 49: 483-492.