Molecular monolayer-mediated control over semiconductor surfaces: Evidence for molecular depolarization of silane monolayers on Si/SiOx

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 16, 2003, Pages 4730-4731

  Gershevitz, Olga ^a   Sukenik, Chaim N ^a   Ghabboun, Jamal ^b   Cahen, David ^b  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENZOIC ACID DERIVATIVE; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICONE;

ADSORPTION; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BINDING; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONFORMATION; DEPOLARIZATION; DIPOLE; REACTION ANALYSIS; SEMICONDUCTOR; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037462126     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja029529h     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Seker, F.; Meeker, K.; Keuch, T. F.; Ellis, A. B. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2505.
2. Bastide, S.; Butruille, R.; Cahen, D.; Dutta, A.; Libman, J.; Shanzer, A.; Sun, L.; Vilan, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 2678.
3. Taylor, D. M.; Oliveira, O. N.; Morgan, H. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1990, 139, 508.
4. Ashkenasy, G.; Cahen, D.; Cohen, R.; Shanzer, A.; A., V. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 121.
5. Cohen, R.; Zenou, N.; Cahen, D.; Yitzchaik, S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 279, 270.
6. (a) Evans, S. D.; Urankar, E.; Ulman, A.; Ferris, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4121.
7. (b) Bruening, M.; Cohen, R.; Guillemoles, J. F.; Moav, T.; Libman, J.; Shanzer, A.; Cahen, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5720.
8. (c) Zehner, R. W.; Parsons, B. F.; Hsung, R. P.; Sita, L. R. Langmuir 1999, 15, 1121.
9. Nuesch, F.; Forsythe, E. W.; Le, Q. T.; Gao, Y.; Rothberg, L. J. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 87, 7973. Ganzorig, C.; Kwak, K. J.; Yagi, K.; Fujihira, M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 272.
10. Nuesch, F.; Forsythe, E. W.; Le, Q. T.; Gao, Y.; Rothberg, L. J. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 87, 7973. Ganzorig, C.; Kwak, K. J.; Yagi, K.; Fujihira, M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 272.
11. Gal, D.; Sone, E.; Cohen, R.; Hodes, G.; Libman, J.; Shanzer, A.; Schock, H. W.; Cahen, D. Proc. - Indian Acad. Sci., Chem. Sci. 1997, 109, 487.
12. 2 (cf. Figures 6, 7 in ref 6b), the observed ΔV is significantly less than the predicted value, this is true for all substituents, not only for those with large dipole moments, and, thus, has been attributed to other factors (cf. ref 6b,c).
13. (a) Mönch, W. Semiconductors Surfaces & Interfaces, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin, 1995.
14. (b) Lüth, H. Surfaces & Interfaces of Solid Materials, 3rd ed.; Springer: Berlin, 1998.
15. (c) Spicer, W. E.; Gregory, P. E.; Cgye, P. W.; Babalola, I. A.; Sukegawa, T. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1975, 27, 617.
16. (a) Taylor, D. M.; Bayes, G. F. Phys Rev. E 1994, 49, 1439.
17. (b) McConnell, H. M.; Bazaliy, Ya. B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 8823.
18. (c) Iwamoto, M.; Mizutani, Y.; Sugimura, A. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 8186.
19. (d) Vager, Z.; Naaman, R. Chem. Phys. 2002, 281, 305.
20. Gershevitz, O.; et al., to be published.
21. (a) Allara, D. L.; Parikh, A. N.; Rondelez, F. Langmuir 1995, 11, 2357.
22. (b) Baptiste, A.; Gibaud, A.; Bardeau, J. F.; Wen, K.; Maoz, R.; Sagiv, J.; Ocko, B. M. Langmuir 2002, 18, 3916.
23. 2, which are slightly thicker and whose UV spectra also suggest some multilayer character; see also Supporting Information.
24. Kwok, C. S.; Mourad, P. D.; Crum, L. A.; Ratner, B. D. Biomacromolecules 2000, 1, 139; see also Supporting Information.
25. Jaffe, H. H.; Orchin, M. Theory and Applications of Ultraviolet Spectroscopy; Wiley: New York, 1966; pp 242-268.
26. (a) Bruening, M.; Moons, E.; Yaron-Marcovich, D.; Cahen, D.; Libman, J.; Shanzer, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2972.
27. (b) Kronik, L.; Shapira, Y. Surf. Sci. Rep. 1999, 37, 1.
28. 2 derivatives, and the other ones.
29. 11 chain), taking into account polarization effects.
30. 2 groups (less dipole-dipole repulsion) than when all nitro groups are incorporated by in situ nitration, which may proceed with islands of nitration: see also Supporting Information.
31. The latter is unlikely at the level of organization reached here as we did not observe significant differences between molecules with y = 3, 6, or 11 (to be published), but may be important for better ordered films (cf. ref 15).