Optimizing the size and configuration of combinatorial libraries

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 381-390

  Wright, Trudi ^a   Gillet, Valerie J ^a   Green, Darren V S ^b   Pickett, Stephen D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ALGORITHMS; LIBRARIES; SIMULATED ANNEALING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

COMBINATORIAL LIBRARIES;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 0037363631     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0255836     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Combinatorial Library Design and Evaluation - Principles, Software Tools and Applications in Drug Discovery; Ghose, A. K., Viswanadhan, V. N., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2001.
2. Valler, M. J.; Green, D. Diversity Screening Versus Focused Screening in Drug Discovery. Drug Discovery Today 2000, 5, 286-293.
3. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1997, 23, 3-25.
4. Oprea, T. I.; Davis, A. M.; Teague, S. D.; Leeson, P. D.Is There a Difference Between Leads and Drugs? A Historical Perspective. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1308-1315.
5. Hann, M. M.; Leach, A. R.; Harper, G. Molecular Complexity and its Impact on the Probability of Finding Leads for Drug Discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 856-864.
6. Good, A. C.; Lewis, R. A. New Methodology for Profiling Combinatorial Libraries and Screening Sets: Cleaning up the Design with HARPick. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3926-3936.
7. Martin, E. J.; Crichlow, R. W. Beyond Mere Diversity: Tailoring Combinatorial Libraries for Drug Discovery. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 32-45.
8. Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Bradshaw, J.; Green, D. V. S. Selecting Combinatorial Libraries to Optimise Diversity and Physical Properties. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 169-177.
9. Zheng, W.; Hung, S. T.; Saunders, J. T.; Seibel, G. L. PICCOLO: A Tool for Combinatorial Library Design via Multicriterion Optimization. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2000; Atlman, R. B., Dunkar, A. K., Hunter, L., Lauderdale K., Klein, T. E., Eds.; World Scientific: Singapore, 2000; pp 588-599.
10. Brown, J. D.; Hassan, M.; Waldman, M. Combinatorial Library Design for Diversity, Cost Efficiency, and Drug-Like Character. J. Mol Graph. Model. 2000, 18, 427-437.
11. Gillet, V. J.; Khatib, W.; Willett, P.; Fleming, P. J.; Green, D. V. S. Combinatorial Library Design Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2002, 42, 375-385.
12. Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Fleming, P.; Green, D. V. S. Designing Focused Libraries Using MoSELECT. J. Mol Graph. Model. 2002, 20, 491-498.
13. UK Patent Application No. 0029361.
14. Agrafiotis, D. K. Mulitobjective Optimisation of Combinatorial Libraries. IBM R. Res., Dev. 2001, 45, 545-566.
15. Fonseca C. M.; Fleming P. J. An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiojective Optimisation. Evolutionary Comput, 1995, 3, 1-16.
16. Nicolotti, O.; Gillet, V. J.; Fleming, P. J.; Green, D. V. S. Multiobjective Optimization in Quantitative Structure - Activity Relationships: Deriving Accurate and Interpretable QSARs. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 5069-5080.
17. Handschuh, S.; Wagener, M.; Gasteiger, J. Superposition of Three-Dimensional Chemical Structures Allowing for Conformational Flexibility by a Hybrid Method. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 220-232.
18. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning; Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.: 1989.
19. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Designing Combinatorial Library Mixtures Using a Genetic Algorithm. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 2304-2313.
20. Pickett, S. D.; McLay, I. M.; Clark, D. E. Enhancing the Hit-to-Lead Properties of Lead Optimization Libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 263-272.
21. Fonseca, C. M.; Fleming, P. J. Multiobjective Optimisation and Multiple Constraint Handling with Evolutionary Algorithms - Part I: A unified formulation. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics 1998, 28, 26-37.
22. 2 is available from Accelrys Inc., 9685 Scranton Road, San Diego, CA 92121.
23. The World Drug Index is available from Derwent Information, 14 Great Queen St., London WC2B 5DF, UK.
24. Fonseca, C. M.; Fleming, P. J. On the Performance Assessment and Comparison of Stochastic Multiobjective Optimizers. In Parallel Problem Solving From Nature V; Voigt, H. M., Ebeling, W., Rechenberg, I., Schwefel, H. P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1995; pp 584-593.
25. Coello Coello, C. A.; van Veldhuizen, D. A.; Lamont, G. B. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems; Kluwer Academic Publishers: New York, 2002.