Multiobjective optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationships: Deriving accurate and interpretable QSARs

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 45, Issue 23, 2002, Pages 5069-5080

  Nicolotti, Orazio ^a   Gillet, Valerie J ^a   Fleming, Peter J ^a   Green, Darren V S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; LINEAR SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; DRUG DESIGN; MODELS, STATISTICAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0037038314     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm020919o     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. So, S.-S. Quantitative structure-activity relationships. In Evolutionary Algorithms in Molecular Design; Clark, D. E., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000; pp 71-97.
2. McFarland, J. W.; Gans, D. J. On identifying likely determinants of biological activity in high dimensional QSAR problem. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1994, 13, 11-17.
3. Selwood, D. L.; Livingstone, D. J.; Comley, J. C.; O'Dowd, B. A.; Hudson, A. T.; Jackson, P.; Jandu, K. S.; Rose, V. S.; Stables, J. N. Structure-activity relationships of antifilarial antimycin analogues: A multivariate pattern recognition study. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 136-142.
4. Camilleri, P.; Livingstone, D. J.; Murphy, J. A.; Manallack, D. T. Chiral chromatography and multivariate quantitative structure-property relationships relationships of bezoimidazole sulphoxides. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1993, 7, 61-69.
5. Domine, D.; Devillers, J.; Chastrette, M. A non linear map of substituent constants for selecting test series and deriving structure-activity relationships. II. Aliphatic series. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 981-987.
6. Norinder, U. A. A PLS QSAR analysis using 3D generated aromatic descriptors of principal property type: Application of some dopamine D2 benzamide antagonists. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1993, 7, 671-682.
7. Wikel, J. H.; Dow, E. R. The use of neural networks for variable selection in QSAR. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3, 645-651.
8. Luke, B. T. Comparison of different data set screening methods for use in QSAR/QSPR generation studies. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2000, 507, 229-238.
9. Rogers, D. R.; Hopfinger, A., J. Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 854-866.
10. Kubinyi, H. Variable selection in QSAR studies. I. An evolutionary algorithm. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1994, 13, 285-294.
11. Kubinyi, H. Variable selection in QSAR studies. II. A highly efficient combination of systematic search and evolution. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1994, 13, 393-401.
12. So, S.; Karplus, M. Evolutionary optimisation in Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship: An application of genetic neural networks. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1521-1530.
13. Waller, C. L.; Bradley, M. P. Development and validation of a novel variable selection technique with application to multidimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship studies. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 345-355.
14. Koza, J. R. Genetic Programming; The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993.
15. Clark, D. E., Ed. Evolutionary Algorithms in Molecular Design; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000.
16. Nachbar, R. B. Molecular evolution: A hierarchical representation for chemical topology and its automated manipulation. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Genetic Programming Conference, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 22-25 July, 1998; pp 246-253.
17. Globus, A.; Lawton, J.; Wipke, T. Automatic molecular design using evolutionary techniques. Nanotechnology 1999, 10, 290-299.
18. Rodríguez-Vázquez, K.; Fleming, P. J. Multi-objective genetic programming for nonlinear system identification. Electron. Lett. 1998, 34, 930-931.
19. Fonseca, C. M.; Fleming, P. J. An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimisation. In Evolutionary Computation; De Jong, K., Ed.; The Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, 1995; Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-16.
20. Fonseca, C. M.; Fleming, P. J. Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalisation. In Genetic Algorithms: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference; Forrest, S., Ed.; Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA, 1993; pp 416-423.
21. Coello Coello, C. A. An updated survey of GA-based multiobjective optimization techniques. ACM Computing Surveys 2000, 32, 109-143.
22. Handschuh, S.; Wagener, M.; Gasteiger, J. Superposition of three-dimensional chemical structures allowing for conformational flexibility by a hybrid method. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 220-232.
23. Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Fleming, P.; Green, D. V. S. Designing focused libraries using MoSELECT. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 491-498.
24. Gillet, V. J.; Khatib, W.; Willett, P.; Fleming, P. J.; Green D. V. S. Combinatorial library design using a multiobjective genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 375-385.
25. International Patent Application No. PCT/GB01/05347.
26. Huuskonen, J. Estimation of aqueous solubility for a diverse set of organic compounds based on molecular topology. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 773-777.
27. Molconn-Z is available from eduSoft, LC., P.O. Box 1811, Ashland, VA 23005.
28. McElroy, N. R.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of aqueous solubility of heteroatom-containing organic compounds from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1237-1247.