Cytogenetics in reproductive medicine: The contribution of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)

BioEssays

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 289-300

  Wells, Dagan ^a   Levy, Brynn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CYTOGENETICS; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GAMETOGENESIS; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR;

ANEUPLOIDY; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN; CYTOGENETICS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; KARYOTYPING; MALE; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 0037335781     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.10232     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Short RV When a conception fails to become a pregnancy. Ciba Found Symp 1979;64:377-394.
2. Edwards RG, Gardner RL. Sexing of live rabbit blastocysts. Nature 1967;214:576-577.
3. Boue J, Bou A, Lazar P Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions. Teratology 1975;12:11-26.
4. Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J, Jooss T, Manuel B, Matsuura J, Matsuyama A, Wilson C, Yamane JA, Jacobs PA. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet 1980;44:151-178
5. Delhanty JD, Harper JC, Ao A, Handyside AH, Winston RM. Multicolour FISH detects frequent chromosomal mosaicism and chaotic division in normal preimplantation embryos from fertile patients. Hum Genet 1997;99:755-760.
6. Munne S, Magli C, Bahce M, Fung J, Legator M, Morrison L, Cohert J, Gianaroli L. Preimplantation diagnosis of the aneuploidies most commonly found in spontaneous abortions and live births: XY, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22. Prenat Diagn 1998;18:1459-1466.
7. Harper JC, Coonen E, Handyside AH, Winston RM, Hopman AH, Delhanty JD, Mosaicism of autosomes and sex chromosomes in morphologically normal, monospermic preimplantation human embryos. Prenat Diagn 1995;15:41-49.
8. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Fiorentino A, Garrisi J, Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis increases the implantation rate in human in vitro fertilization by avoiding the transfer of chromosomally abnormal embryos. Fertil Steril 1997;68:1128-1131.
9. Munne S, Wells D Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Curr Opin Obs & Gyn 2002;14:239-244.
10. Wells D, Delhanty JD. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: applications for molecular medicine. Trends Mol Med 2001;7:23-30.
11. ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium: data collection III (May 2001). Hum Reprod 2002;17:233-246.
12. Munne S, Sandalinas M. Escudero T, Fung J, Gianaroli L, Cohen J. Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1209-1218.
13. Munne S, Scott R, Sable D, Cohen J. First pregnancies after preconception diagnosis of translocations of maternal origin Fertil Steril 1998;69:675-681.
14. Conn CM, Harper JC, Winston RM, Delhanty JD. Infertile couples with Robertsonian translocations: preimplantation genetic analysis of embryos reveals chaotic cleavage divisions Hum Genet 1998;102:117-123.
15. Klever M, Grond-Ginsbach CJ, Hager HD, Schroeder-Kurth TM. Chorionic villus metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei analysed by chromosomal in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization. Prenat Diagn 1992;12:53-59.
16. Ried T, Landes G, Dackowski W, Klinger K, Ward DC Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization for the simultaneous detection of probe sets for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y in uncultured amniotic fluid cells. Hum Mol Genet 1992;1:307-313.
17. Rao PN, Hayworth R, Cox K, Grass F, Pettenati MJ. Rapid detection of aneuploidy in uncultured chorionic villus cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Prenat Diagn 1993;13:233-238.
18. Zahed L, Murer-Orlando M, Vekemans M. In situ hybridization studies for the detection of common aneuploidies in CVS. Prenat Diagn 1992;12:483-493
19. Bryndorf T, Christensen B, Xiang Y, Philip J, Yokobata K, Bui N, Gaiser C. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with a chromosome 21-specific cosmid contig: 1-day detection of trisomy 21 in uncultured mesenchymal chorionic villus cells. Prenat Diagn 1994;14:87-96.
20. Van Opstal D, Van Hemel JO, Sachs ES. Fetal aneuploidy diagnosed by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation within 24 hours after amniocentesis. Lancet 1993;342:802.
21. Price JO, et al. Prenatal diagnosis with fetal cells isolated from maternal blood by multiparameter flow cytometry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:1731-1737.
22. Elias S, Price J, Dockter M, Wachtel S, Tharapel A, Simpson JL, Klinger KW. First trimester prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in fetal cells from maternali blood. Lancet 1992;340:1033.
23. Ganshirt-Ahlert D, et al. Detection of fetal trisomies 21 and 18 from maternal blood using triple gradient and magnetic cell sorting. Am J. Reprod Immunol 1993;30:194-201.
24. Simpson JL, Elias S. Isolating fetal cells from maternal blood. Advances in prenatal diagnosis through molecular technology. JAMA 1993;270:2357-2361.
25. Munne S, Dailey T, Sultan KM, Grifo J, Cohen J. The use of first polar bodies for preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1014-1020.
26. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V, Lifchez A, Strom C, Kuliev A. Birth of healthy children after preimplantation diagnosis of common aneuploidies by polar body fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis. Preimplantation Genetics Group. Fertil Steril 1996;66:126-129.
27. Ruangvutilert P, Delhanty JD, Rodeck CH, Harper JC. Relative efficiency of FISH on metaphase and interphase nuclei from non-mosaic trisomic or triploid fibroblast cultures. Prenat Diagn 2000;20:159-162.
28. Schröck E, et al. Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes Science 1996;273:494-497.
29. Speicher MR, Gwyn Ballard S, Ward DC. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nat Genet 1996;12:368-375.
30. Clouston HJ, Fenwick J. Webb AL, Herbert M, Murdoch A, Wolstenholme J Detection of mosaic and non-mosaic chromosome abnormalities in 6- to 8-day old human blastocysts. Hum Genet 1997;101:30-36.
31. Willadsen S, Levron J, Munne S, Schimmel T, Marquez C, Scott R, Cohen J Rapid visualization of metaphase chromosomes in single human blastomeres after fusion with in-vitro matured bovine eggs. Hum Reprod 1999;14:470-475.
32. Verlinsky Y, Evsikov S. A simplified and efficient method for obtaining metaphase chromosomes from individual human blastomeres. Fertil Steril 1999;72:1127-1133.
33. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman F, Pinkel D. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 1992;258:818-821.
34. du Manoir S, Speicher MR, Joos S, Schröck E, Popp S, Dohner H, Kovacs G, Robert-Nicoud M, Lichter P, Cremer T. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 1993;90:590-610.
35. Ghaffari SR, Boyd E, Tolmie JL, Crow YJ, Trainer AH, Connor JM. A new strategy for cryptic telomeric translocation screening in patients with idiopathic mental retardation J Med Genet 1998;35:225-233.
36. Kirchhoff M, Gerdes T, Maahr J, Rose H, Bentz M, Dohner H, Lundsteen C. Deletions below 10 megabasepairs are detected in comparative genomic hybridization by standard reference intervals. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999;25:410-413.
37. Kirchhoff M, Rose H, Lundsteen C High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation in clinical cytogenetics J Med Genet 2001;38:740-744.
38. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Piper J, Tanner M, Stokke T, Chen L, Smith HS, Pinkel D, Gray JW, Waldman FM. Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:2156-2160.
39. Gordon KB, Thompson CT, Char DH, O'Brien JM, Kroll S, Ghazvini S, Gray JW. Comparative genomic hybridization in the detection of DNA copy number abnormalities in uveal melanoma. Cancer Res 1994;54:4764-4768.
40. Speicher MR, Prescher G, du Manoir S, Jauch A, Horsthemke B, Bornfeld N, Becher R, Cremer T. Chromosomal gains and losses in uveal melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 1994;54:3817-3823.
41. Becher R, Korn WM, Prescher G. Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization in the cytogenetic analysis of testicular germ cell tumors and uveal melanomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1997;93:22-28.
42. Ried T, Petersen I, Holtgreve-Grez H, Speicher MR, Schrock E, du Manoir S, Cremer T. Mapping of multiple DNA gains and losses in primary small cell lung carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 1994;54:1801-1806
43. Levin NA, Brzoska PM, Warnock ML, Gray JW, Christman MF. Identification of novel regions of altered DNA copy number in small cell lung tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1995;13:175-185.
44. Schröck E, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of human malignant gliomas reveals multiple amplification sites and nonrandom chromosomal gains and losses. Am J Pathol 1994;144:1203-1218.
45. Forus A, Weghuis DO, Smeets D, Fodstad O, Myklebost O, van Kessel AG. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human sarcomas: I. Occurrence of genomic imbalances and identification of a novel major amplicon at 1q21-q22 in soft tissue sarcomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1995;14:8-14.
46. Forus A, Weghuis DO, Smeets D, Fodstad O, Myklebost O, Geurts van Kessel A. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human sarcomas: II. Identification of novel amplicons at 6p and 17p in osteosarcomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1995;14:15-21.
47. Speicher MR, Howe C, Crotty P, du Manoir S, Costa J, Ward DC. Comparative genomic hybridization detects novel deletions and amplifications in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Res 1995;55:1010-1013.
48. Solinas-Toldo S, Wallrapp C, Muller-Pillasch F, Bentz M, Gress T, Lichter P. Mapping of chromosomal imbalances in pancreatic carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 1996;56:3803-3807.
49. Isola J, Kallioniemi OP, Chu LW, Fuqua SA, Hilsenbeck SG, Osborne CK, Waldman FM. Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization predict outcome in node-negative breast cancer. Am J Pathol 1995;147:905-911.
50. Moch H, Presti JC, Jr., Sauter G, Buchholz N, Jordan P, Mihatsch MJ, Waldman FM. Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization are associated with clinical outcome in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 1996;56:27-30.
51. Prescher G, Bornfeld N, Hirche H, Horsthemke B, Jockel KH, Becher R Prognostic implications of monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma. Lancet 1996;347:1222-1225
52. Wiltshire RN, Duray P, Bittner ML, Visakorpi T, Meltzer PS, Tuthill RJ, Liotta LA, Trent JM. Direct visualization of the clonal progression of primary cutaneous melanoma: application of tissue microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 1995;55:3954-3957.
53. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Citro G, Sauter G, DeVries S, Kerschmann R, Caroll P, Waldman F. identification of gains and losses of DNA sequences in primary bladder cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1995;12:213-219.
54. Heselmeyer K, Schrock E, du Manoir S, Bleger H, Shah K, Steinbeck R, Auer G, Ried T. Gain of chromosome 3q defines the transition from severe dysplasia to invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:479-484.
55. Joos S, Bergerheim US, Pan Y, Matsuyama H, Bentz M, du Manoir S, Lichter P. Mapping of chromosomal gains and losses in prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1995;14:267-276.
56. Visakorpi T, Kallioniemi AH, Syvanen AC, Hyytinen ER, Karhu R, Tammela T, Isola JJ, Kailioniemi OP. Genetic changes in primary and recurrent prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 1995;55:342-347.
57. Korn WM, Oide Weghuis DE, Suijkerbuijk RF, Schmidt U, Otto T, du Manoir S, Geurts van Kessel A, Harstrick A, Seeber S, Becher R. Detection of chromosomal DNA gains and losses in testicular germ cell tumors by comparative genomic hybridization Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1996;17:78-87.
58. Kiechle M, Jacobsen A, Schwarz-Boeger U, Hedderich J, Pfisterer J, Arnold N. Comparative genomic hybridization detects genetic imbalances in primary ovarian carcinomas as correlated with grade of differentiation. Cancer 2001;91:534-540.
59. Hauptmann S, Denkert C, Koch I, Petersen S, Schluns K, Reles A, Dietel M, Petersen I. Genetic alterations in epithelial ovarian tumors analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Pathol 2002;33:632-641.
60. Suehiro Y, Umayahara K, Ogata H, Numa F, Yamashita Y, Oga A, Morioka H, Ito T, Kato H, Sasaki K. Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization predict outcome in patients with endometrioid carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000;29:75-82.
61. Sonoda G, du Manoir S, Godwin AK, Bell DW, Liu Z, Hogan M, Yakushiji M, Testa JR. Detection of DNA gains and losses in primary endometrial carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997;18:115-125.
62. Levy B, Mukherjee T, Hirschhorn K. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2000;121:1-8
63. Hu J, Khanna V, Jones M, Surti U. Genomic alterations in uterine leiomyosarcomas: potential markers for clinical diagnosis and prognosis Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2001;31:117-124.
64. Leana-Cox J, Levin S, Surana R, Wulfsberg E, Keene CL, Raffel LJ, Sullivan B, Schwartz S. Characterization of de novo duplications in eight patients by using fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific DNA libraries. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:1067-1073.
65. Blennow E, Bui TH, Kristoffersson U, Vujic M, Annerén G, Holmberg E, Nordenskjold M. Swedish survey on extra structurally abnormal chromosomes in 39 105 consecutive prenatal diagnoses: prevalence and characterization by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Prenat Diagn 1994;14:1019-1028.
66. Carter NP, et al. Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics. J Med Genet 1992;29:299-307.
67. Thangavelu M, Pergament E, Espinosa R, 3rd, Bohlander SK. Characterization of marker chromosomes by microdissection and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Prenat Diagn 1994;14:583-588.
68. Bryndorf T, Kirchhoff M, Rose H, Maahr J, Gerdes T, Karhu R, Kallioniemi A, Christensen B, Lundsteen C, Philip J. Comparative genomic hybridization in clinical cytogenetics. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:1211-1220.
69. Levy B, Gershin IF, Desnick RJ, Babu A, Gelb BD, Hirschhorn K, Cotter PD. Characterization of a de novo unbalanced chromosome rearrangement by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1997;76:68-71.
70. Levy B, Dunn TM, Kaffe S, Kardon N, Hirschhorn K. Clinical applications of comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 1998;1:4-12.
71. Levy B, Papenhausen PR, Tepperberg JH, Dunn TM, Fallet S, Magid MS, Kardon NB, Hirschhorn K, Warburton PE. Prenatal molecular cytogenetic diagnosis of partial tetrasomy 10p due to neocentromere formation in an inversion duplication analphoid marker chromosome. Cytogenet Cell Genet 2000;91:165-170.
72. Levy B, Dunn TM, Kern JH, Hirschhorn K, Kardon NB. Delineation of the dup5q phenotype by molecular cytogenetic analysis in a patient with dup5q/del 5p (cri du chat). Am J Med Genet 2002;108:192-197.
73. Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p 478
74. Vendrely R The deoxyribonucleic acid content of the nucleus. In: Chargaff E, Davidson JN, editors The Nucleic Acids, Chemistry and Biology. Vol. II. New York: Academic Press; 1955. p 155-180.
75. Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, Delhanty JD. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation. Nucleic Acids Res 1999;27:1214-1218
76. Wells D, Delhanty JD. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod 2000;6:1055-1062.
77. Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R, Wilton L. Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Genet 2000;106:210-217
78. Wilton L, Williamson R, McBain J, Edgar D, Voullaire L. Birth of a healthy infant after preimplantation confirmation of euploidy by comparative genomic hybridization. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1537-1541.
79. Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B, Hirschhorn K, Delhanty JDA, Munne S. First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 2002;78:543-549.
80. Sandalinas M, Marquez C, Munne S. Spectral karyotyping of fresh, non-inseminated oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 2002;8:580-585.
81. Koehler KE, Hawley RS, Sherman S, Hassold T. Recombination and nondisjunction in humans and flies Hum Mol Genet 1996;5:1495-1504.
82. Piper J, Rutovitz D, Sudar D, Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Waldman FM, Gray JW, Pinkel D. Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization Cytometry 1995;19:10-26
83. Bentz M, Plesch A, Stilgenbauer S, Dohner H, Lichter P. Minimal sizes of deletions detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1998;21:172-175
84. Pinkel D, et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 1998;20:207-211.
85. Pollack JR, Perou CM, Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Pergamenschikov A, Williams CF, Jeffrey SS, Botstein D, Brown PO. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet 1999;23:41-46.
86. Heiskanen MA, Bittner ML, Chen Y, Khan J, Adler KE, Trent JM, Meltzer PS. Detection of gene amplification by genomic hybridization to cDNA microarrays. Cancer Res 2000;60:799-802.
87. Bruder CE, et al. High resolution deletion analysis of constitutional DNA from neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients using microarray-CGH. Hum Mol. Genet 2001;10:271-282.
88. Hodgson G, et al. Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas. Nat Genet 2001;29:459-464.
89. Wessendorf S, et al. Automated Screening for Genomic Imbalances using Matrix-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization. Lab Invest 2002;82:47-60.
90. Albertson DG, Yistra B, Segraves R, Collins C, Dairkee SH, Kowbel D, Kuo WL, Gray JW, Pinkel D Quantitative mapping of amplicon structure by array CGH identifies CYP24 as a candidate oncogene. Nat Genet 2000;25:144-146
91. Cai WW, Mao JH, Chow CW, Damani S, Balmain A, Bradley A. Genomeq-wide detection of chromosomal imbalances in tumors using BAC microarrays Nat Biotechnol 2002;20:393-396