Dramatically elevated rate of mitochondrial substitution in lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 231-242

  Johnson, Kevin P ^a   Cruickshank, Robert H ^b   Adams, Richard J ^c   Smith, Vincent S ^b   Page, Roderic D M ^b   Clayton, Dale H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

COI; Elongation factor 1 ; Insecta; Lice; Phthiraptera; Substitution rates

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; BIRDS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTOR-1; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LICE; MAMMALS; MITOCHONDRIA; MODELS, GENETIC; PEPTIDE INITIATION FACTORS; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; VARIATION (GENETICS);

APHIDIDAE; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; PHTHIRAPTERA;

EID: 0037331484     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00342-1     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Barker, F.K., Lutzoni, F., 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51, 625-637.
2. Brown, W.M., George Jr., M., Wilson, A.C., 1979. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. PNAS 76, 1967-1971.
3. Clayton, D.H., Gregory, R.D., Price, R.D., 1992. Comparative ecology of neotropical bird lice. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 781-795.
4. Cruickshank, R.H., Johnson, K.P., Smith, V.S., Adams, R.J., Clayton, D.H., Page, R.D.M., 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of partial sequences of elongation factor 1α identifies major groups of lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 19, 202-215.
5. Cryan, J.R., Wiegmann, B.N., Deitz, L.L., Dietrich, C.H., 2000. Phylogeny of treehoppers (Insecta: Hemiptera: Membracidae): evidence from two nuclear genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17, 317-334.
6. Danforth, B.N., Ji, S., 1998. Elongation factor-1α occurs as two copies in bees: implications for phylogenetic analysis of EF-1α sequences in insects. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 225-235.
7. Darlu, P., Lecointre, G., 2002. When does the incongruence length difference test fail? Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 432-437.
8. Denver, D.R., Morris, K., Lynch, M., Vassilieva, L.L., Thomas, W.K., 2000. High direct estimate of the mutation rate in the mitochondrial genome of Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 289, 2342-2344.
9. DeSalle, R., Freedman, T., Prager, E.M., Wilson, A.C., 1987. Tempo and mode of sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 26, 157-164.
10. Dolphin, K., Belshaw, R., Orme, C.D.L., Quicke, D.L.J., 2000. Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17, 401-406.
11. Farris, J.S., Kallersjo, M., Kluge, A.G., Bult, C., 1994. Testing significance of congruence. Cladistics 10, 315-320.
12. Farris, J.S., Kallersjo, M., Kluge, A.G., Bult, C., 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44, 570-572.
13. Felsenstein, J., 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17, 368-376.
14. Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
15. Hafner, M.S., Sudman, P.D., Villablance, F.X., Spradling, T.A., Demastes, J.W., Nadler, S.A., 1994. Disparate rates of molecular evolution in cospeciating hosts and parasites. Science 365, 1087-1090.
16. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Crandall, K.A., 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 437-466.
17. Jacobs, H., Elliott, D., Math, V., Farquharson, A., 1988. Nucleotide sequence and gene organization of sea urchin mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 202, 185-217.
18. Johnson, K.P., Clayton, D.H., 2002. Coevolutionary history of ecological replicates: comparing phylogenies of wing and body lice to Columbiform hosts. In: Page, R.D.M. (Ed.), Tangled Trees: Phylogeny, Cospeciation, and Coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
19. Johnson, K.P., Clayton, D.H., 2000. Nuclear and mitochondrial genes contain similar phylogenetic signal for pigeons and doves (Ayes: Columbiformes). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14, 141-151.
20. Johnson, K.P., Sorenson, M.D., 1998. Comparing molecular evolution in two mitochondrial protein coding genes (cytochrome b and ND2) in the dabbling ducks (Tribe: Anatini). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10, 82-94.
21. Johnson, K.P., Sorenson, M.D., 1999. Phylogeny and biogeography of dabbling ducks (Genus: Anas): a comparison of molecular and morphological evidence. Auk 116, 792-805.
22. Johnson, K.P., Weckstein, J.D., Witt, C.C., Faucett, R.C., Moyle, R.G., 2002. The perils of using host relationships in parasite taxonomy: phylogeny of the Degeeriella complex. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 23, 150-157.
23. Johnson, K.P., Whiting, M.F., 2002. Multiple genes and the monophyly of Ischnocera (Insecta: Phthiraptera). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22, 101-110.
24. Jukes, T.H., Cantor, C.R., 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro, H.N. (Ed.), Mammalian Protein Metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp. 21-123.
25. Kimura, M., 1962. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47, 713-719.
26. Li, W-H., 1997. Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
27. Lyal, C.H.C., 1985. Phylogeny and classification of Psocodea, with particular reference to lice (Psocodea: Phthiraptera). Syst. Entomol. 10, 145-165.
28. Maddison, W.P., 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46, 523-536.
29. Mason-Gamer, R.J., Kellogg, E.A., 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45, 524-545.
30. McArdle, B.H., 1988. The structural relationship: regression in biology. Can. J. Zool. 66, 2239-2339.
31. Mindell, D.P., Thacker, C.E., 1996. Rates of molecular evolution: phylogenetic issues and applications. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27, 279-303.
32. Miyata, T., Hayashida, H., Kikuno, R., Hasegawa, M., Kobayashi, M., Koike, K., 1982. Molecular clock of silent substitution: at least six-fold preponderance of silent changes in mitochondrial genes over those in nuclear genes. J. Mol. Evol. 19, 28-35.
33. Monteiro, A., Pierce, N.E., 2001. Phylogeny of Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from COI, COII, and EF-1α gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18, 264-281.
34. Moran, N.A., Kaplan, M.E., Gelsey, M.J., Murphy, T.G., Scholes, E.A., 1999. Phylogenetics and evolution of the aphid genus Uroleucon based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Syst. Entomol. 24, 85-93.
35. Moriyama, E.N., Powell, J.R., 1997. Synonymous substitution rates in Drosophila: mitochondrial versus nuclear genes. J. Mol. Evol. 45, 378-391.
36. Page, R.D.M., 1996. Temporal congruence revisited: comparison of mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence in cospeciating pocket gophers and their chewing lice. Syst. Biol. 45, 151-167.
37. Page, R.D.M., Lee, P.L.M., Becher, A., Griffiths, R., Clayton, D.H., 1998. A different tempo of mitochondrial DNA evolution in birds and their parasitic lice. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9, 276-293.
38. Pamilo, P., Nei, M., 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5, 568-583.
39. Paterson, A.M., Wallis, G.P., Wallis, L.J., Gray, R.D., 2000. Seabird and louse coevolution: complex histories revealed by 12S rRNA sequences and reconciliation analysis. Syst. Biol. 49, 383-399.
40. Posada, D., Crandall, K.A., 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817-818.
41. Sanderson, M.J., 1990. Estimating rates of speciation and evolution: a bias due to homoplasy. Cladistics 6, 387-391.
42. Satta, Y., Ishiwa, H., Chigusa, S.I., 1987. Analysis of nucleotide substitutions of mitochondrial DNAs in Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 638-650.
43. Shao, R., Campbell, N.J.H., Barker, S.C., 2001. Numerous gene rearrangements in the mitochondrial genome of the wallaby louse, Heterodoxus macropus (Phthiraptera). Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 858-865.
44. Simmons, R.B., Weller, S.J., 2001. Utility and evolution of cytochrome b in insects. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20, 196-210.
45. Slowinski, J.B., Page, R.D.M., 1999. How should species phylogenies be inferred from sequence data? Syst. Biol. 48, 814-825.
46. Sturmbauer, C., Meyer, A., 1992. Genetic divergence, speciation, and morphological stasis in a lineage of African cichlid fishes. Nature 358, 578-581.
47. Swofford, D.L., 2001. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, ver. 4.0, β. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
48. Tamura, K., 1992. The rate and pattern of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 814-825.
49. Yang, Z., 1996. Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42, 587-596.
50. Yang, Z., 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biol. Sci. 13, 555-556.
51. Yoshizawa, K., Saigusa, T., 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of paraneopteran orders (Insecta: Neoptera) based on forewing base structure, with comments on monophyly of Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera). Syst. Entomol. 26, 1-13.