Phylogeny and biogeography of dabbling ducks (genus: Anas): A comparison of molecular and morphological evidence

Auk

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 792-805

  Johnson, Kevin P ^a,c   Sorenson, Michael D ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^d Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PHYLOGENY; WATERFOWL;

ALIAS; AMAZONETTA; ANAS; ANAS FORMOSA; ANAS SP.; ANSER; AVES; CALLONETTA; LOPHONETTA; MARECA; SPECULANAS; TACHYERES; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0032817846     PISSN: 00048038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4089339     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1998. Checklist of North American birds, 7th ed. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
2. AVISE, J. C. 1994. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.
3. AVISE, J. C., C. D. ANKNEY, AND W. S. NELSON. 1990. Mitochondrial gene trees and the evolutionary relationship between Mallard and Black Ducks. Evolution 44:1109-1119.
4. BROOKS, D. R. 1990. Parsimony analysis in historical biogeography and coevolution: Methodological and theoretical update. Systematic Zoology 39: 14-30.
5. CHESSER, R. T., AND R. M. ZINK. 1994. Modes of speciation in birds: A test of Lynch's method. Evolution 48:490-497.
6. COOPER, A., J. RHYMER, H. F. JAMES, S. L. OLSON, C. E. MCINTOSH, M. D. SORENSON, AND R. C. FLEISCHER. 1996. Ancient DNA and island endemics. Nature 381:484.
7. DELACOUR, J., AND E. MAYR. 1945. The family Anatidae. Wilson Bulletin 57:2-55.
8. ELLSWORTH, D. L., R. L. HONEYCUTT, AND N. J. SILVY. 1996. Systematics of grouse and ptarmigan determined by nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene. Auk 113:811-822.
9. FARRIS, J. S., M. KALLERSJO, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Testing for significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
10. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
11. HILLIS, D. M., C. MORITZ, AND B. K. MABLE. 1996. Molecular systematics. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts.
12. JOHNSON, K. P. 1997. The evolution of behavior in the dabbling ducks (Anatini): A phylogenetic approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.
13. JOHNSON, K. P., AND M. D. SORENSON. 1998. Comparing molecular evolution in two mitochondrial protein coding genes (cytochrome b and ND2) in the dabbling ducks (tribe: Anatini). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10:82-94.
14. KESSLER, L. G., AND J. C. AVISE. 1984. Systematic relationships among waterfowl (Anatini) inferred from restriction endonuclease analysis of mitochondrial DNA. Systematic Zoology 33:370-380.
15. KRAJEWSKI, C., AND J. W. FETZNER, JR. 1994. Phylogeny of cranes (Gruiformes: Gruidae) based on cytochrome-b DNA sequences. Auk 111:351-365.
16. LACK, D. 1970. The endemic ducks of remote islands. Wildfowl 21:5-10.
17. LANYON, S. M. 1988. The stochastic model of molecular evolution: What consequences for systematic investigations? Auk 105:565-573.
18. LANYON, S. M. 1994. Polyphyly of the blackbird genus Agelaius and the importance of assumptions of monophyly in comparative studies. Evolution 48:679-693.
19. LARA, M., J. PATTON, AND M. DASILVA. 1996. The simultaneous diversification of South American echimyid rodents (Hystricognathi) based on complete cytochrome b sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5:403-413.
20. LIVEZEY, B. C. 1991. A phylogenetic analysis and classification of recent dabbling ducks (tribe Anatini) based on comparative morphology. Auk 108:471-508.
21. LORENZ, K. 1941. Vergleichende Bewegungsstudien an Anatinen. Journal für Ornithologie 89:19-29.
22. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.04. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
23. MCKINNEY, F. 1978. Comparative approaches to social behavior in closely related species of birds. Advances in the Study of Behavior 8:1-38.
24. NUNN, G. B., J. COOPER, P. JOUVENTIN, C. J. R. ROBERTSON, AND G. G. ROBERTSON. 1996. Evolutionary relationships among extant albatrosses (Procellariiformes: Diomedeidae) established from complete cytochrome-b gene sequences. Auk 113:784-801.
25. PALMER, R. S. 1976. Handbook of North American birds, vol. 2. Waterfowl (Part 1). Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
26. PENNY, D., AND M. D. HENDY. 1985. The use of tree comparison metrics. Systematic Zoology 34:75-82.
27. PRICE, T. D., A. J. HELBIG, AND A. D. RICHMAN. 1997. Evolution of breeding distributions in the Old World leaf warblers (genus Phylloscopus). Evolution 51:552-561.
28. RONQUIST, F. 1996. DIVA, version 1.0. Computer program for MacOS and Win32. [Available from www.systbot.uu.se/personel/f_ronquist.html]
29. RONQUIST, F. 1997. Dispersal-vicariance analysis: A new approach to the quantification of historical biogeography. Systematic Biology 46:195-203.
30. SRAML, M., L. CHRISTIDIS, S. EASTEAL, P. HORN, AND C. COLLET. 1996. Molecular relationships within Australian waterfowl (Anseriformes). Australian Journal of Zoology 44:47-58.
31. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1997. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
32. TUOHY, J. M., K. P. MCHUGH, AND S. R. DE KLOET. 1992. Systematic relationships among some Anatini as derived from restriction-endonuclease analysis of a repeated DNA component. Auk 109:465-473.
33. WELLER, M. W. 1980. The island waterfowl. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
34. WILEY, E. O. 1988. Parsimony analysis and vicariance biogeography. Systematic Zoology 37:271-290.
35. ZINK, R. M., AND R. C. BLACKWELL. 1996. Patterns of allozyme, mitochondrial DNA, and morphometric variation in four sparrow genera. Auk 113: 59-67.