Wave packet interferometry for short-time electronic energy transfer: Multidimensional optical spectroscopy in the time domain

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 46-61

  Cina, Jeffrey A ^a   Kilin, Dmitri S ^a   Humble, Travis S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIMERS; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; HAMILTONIANS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR VIBRATIONS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PHASE SPACE METHODS; POTENTIAL ENERGY; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

ELECTRONIC ENERGY TRANSFER; MULTIDIMENSIONAL OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY; OPTICAL PHASE CYCLING; TWO-DIMENSIONAL INTERFEROGRAM; VIBRATIONAL WAVE PACKET; WAVE PACKET INTERFEROMETRY;

INTERFEROMETRY;

EID: 0037255309     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1519259     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. N. F. Scherer, R. Carlson, A. Matro, M. Du, A. J. Ruggiero, V. Romero-Rochin, J. A. Cina, G. R. Fleming, and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 1487 (1991)
2. N. F. Scherer, A. Matro, R. J. Carlson, M. Du, L. D. Ziegler, J. A. Cina, and G. R. Fleming, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 4180 (1992)
3. A. W. Albrecht, J. D. Hybl, S. M. Gallagher Faeder, and D. M. Jonas, J. Chem. Phys. III, 10934 (1999)
4. A. W. Albrecht, J. D. Hybl, S. M. Gallagher Faeder, and D. M. Jonas, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 5691 (2001)
5. W. P. de Boeij, M. S. Pshenichnikov, and D. A. Wiersma, Chem. Phys. 233, 287 (1998)
6. L. Lepetit and M. Joffre, Opt. Lett. 21, 564 (1996)
7. J. D. Hybl, A. Albrecht Ferro, and D. M. Jonas, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6606 (2001)
8. A. H. Zewail, Science 242, 1645 (1988)
9. A. A. Mokhtari and J. Chesnoy, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 25, 2528 (1989)
10. P. F. Barbara and W. Jarzeba, Adv. Photochem. 15, 1 (1990)
11. R. Jimenez, G. R. Fleming, P. V. Kumar, and M. Maroncelli, Nature (London) 369, 471 (1994)
12. M. Chattoraj, B. A. King, G. U. Bublitz, and S. G. Boxer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 8362 (1996)
13. L. W. Ungar and J. A. Cina, Adv. Chem. Phys. 100, 171 (1997)
14. S. Saikan, T. Nakabayashi, Y. Kanematsu, and N. Tato, Phys. Rev. B 38, 7777 (1988)
15. W. H. Hesselink and D. A. Wiersma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1991 (1979)
16. M. C. Beard, G. M. Turner, and C. A. Schmuttenmaer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 1154 (2000)
17. O. Golonzka, M. Khalil, N. Demirdöven, and A. Tokmakoff, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 10814 (2001)
18. M. Zanni, N.-H. Ge, Y. S. Kim and R. M. Hochstrasser, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 11265 (2001)
19. L. J. Kaufman, J. Heo, L. D. Ziegler, and G. R. Fleming, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 207402 (2002)
20. K. J. Kubarych, C. J. Milne, S. Lin, V. Astinov, and R. J. D. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 2016 (2002)
21. M. Cho, N. F. Scherer, G. R. Fleming, and S. Mukamel, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 5618 (1992)
22. S. Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy Oxford University Press, New York, (1995)
23. Y. Tanimura and S. Mukamel, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 9496 (1993)
24. H. Metiu and V. Engel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7, 1709 (1990)
25. W. S. Warren and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 2279 (1983)
26. H. Metiu and V. Engel, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 2298 (1983)
27. W. Domcke and G. Stock, Adv. Chem. Phys. 100, 1 (1997)
28. W. T. Pollard, S. L. Dexheimer, Q. Wang, L. A. Peteanu, C. V. Shank and R. A. Mathies, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 6147 (1992)
29. D. M. Jonas, S. E. Bradforth, S. A. Passino, and G. R. Fleming, ibid. 99, 2594 (1995)
30. T. J. Smith, L. W. Ungar, and J. A. Cina, J. Lumin, J. Phys. Chem. 58, 66 (1994)
31. Z. Li, J. Fang, and C. C. Martens, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 6949 (1996)
32. C. J. Bardeen, J. Che, K. R. Wilson, V. V. Yakovlev, V. A. Apkarian, C. C. Martens, R. Zadoyan, B. Kohler, and M. Messina, ibid. 106, 8486 (1997)
33. Y.-S. Shen and J. A. Cina, ibid. 110, 9793 (1999)
34. M. Karavitas, R. Zadoyan, and V. A. Apkarian, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 4131 (2001)
35. I. Pinkas, G. Knopp, and Y. Prior, ibid. 115, 236 (2001)
36. E. J. Heller, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 2066 (1978)
37. E. J. Heller, R. L. Sundberg, and D. Tannor, J. Phys. Chem. 86, 1822 (1982)
38. J. L. McHale, Acc. Chem. Res. 34, 265 (2001)
39. S. Mukamel, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 3185 (1984)
40. Y. J. Yan and S. Mukamel, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 5735 (1988)
41. R. A. Harris, R. A. Mathies, and W. T. Pollard, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 3744 (1986)
42. A more general approach based on a moment expansion of physical observables, but independent of a Gaussian ansatz on the wave function or density matrix, has been recently put forward by O. V. Prezhdo and Y. V. Pereverzev, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 6557 (2000)
43. J. Chem. Phys. 116, 4450 (2002)
44. D. J. Tannor, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A Time Dependent Perspective University Science Books, New York 2003
45. J. A. Cina and R. A. Harris, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 2531 (1994)
46. Science 267, 832 (1995)
47. R. P. Duarte-Zamorano and V. Romero-Rochín, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 9276 (2001)
48. C. S. Maierle and R. A. Harris, ibid. 109, 3713 (1998)
49. J. A. Cina, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9488 (2000)
50. T. S. Humble and J. A. Cina, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. (to be published)
51. D. J. Tannor and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 5013 (1985)
52. J. Cao, J. Lumin. 87-89, 30 (2000)
53. R. J. Levis, G. M. Menkir, and H. Rabitz, Science 292, 709 (2001)
54. R. Zadoyan, D. Kohen, D. A. Lidar, and V. A. Apkarian, Chem. Phys. 266, 323 (2001)
55. R. van Grondelle, J. P. Dekker, T. Gillbro, and V. Sundstrom, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1187, 1 (1994)
56. X. Hu and K. Shulten, Phys. Today 50, 28 (1997)
57. J-Aggregates, edited by T. Kobayashi (World Scientific, Singapore) 1996
58. H. S. Cho, D. H. Jung, M.-C. Yoon et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 105 4200 (2001)
59. C.-K. Min, T. Joo, M.-C. Yoon, C. M. Kim, Y. N. Hwang, D. Kim, N. Aratani, N. Yoshida, and A. Osuka, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 6750 (2001)
60. F. Zhu, C. Galli, and R. M. Hochstrasser, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1042 (1993)
61. F. Zhu, C. Galli, and R. M. Hochstrasser, J. Chem. Phys. erratum, 98, 9222 (1993)
62. A. Albrecht Ferro and D. M. Jonas, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6281 (2001)
63. Y. Sakata, T. Toyoda, T. Yamazaki, and I. Yamazaki, Tetrahedron Lett. 33, 5077 (1992)
64. J. A. Pescatore and I. Yamazaki, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 13333 (1996)
65. Th. Förster, in Modern Quantum Chemistry, Part III, edited by O. Sinanoglu (Academic, New York) 1965, p. 93
66. S. Rackovsky and R. Silbey, Mol. Phys. 25, 61 (1973)
67. T. F. Soules and C. B. Duke, Phys. Rev. A 3, 262 (1971)
68. For a recent relaxation-theory study of vibrational effects in electronic energy transfer see, M. Yang and G. R. Fleming, Chem. Phys. 275, 355 (2002)
69. W. M. Zhang, V. Chernyak, and S. Mukamel, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 5011 (1999)
70. V. Chernyak, W. M. Zhang, and S. Mukamel, ibid. 109, 9587 (1998)
71. A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987): our reference is to a statement on p. 15 to the effect that for practical purposes, only the population difference between the two [electronic] states was then accesible in realistic experiments
72. 1, unless otherwise stated
73. John Jean investigated the short-pulse-driven dynamics of a similar system in contact with a thermal reservoir in a ground-breaking study of the competition between coherence and relaxation in wave packet surface crossing: J. M. Jean, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 7549 (1998)
74. A. Matro and J. A. Cina, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 2568 (1995)
75. C. Kalyanaraman and D. G. Evans, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 7076 (2001)
76. For plots of the adiabatic potential energy surfaces of this model under strong and weak couplng, see Fig. 2 of Förster's article (Ref. 35)
77. FC, the acceptor surface passes through the donor minimum; for continuous spectra this would be the case of maximal "Förster overlap" between donor emission and acceptor absorption. A further redshift in the acceptor absorption spectrum would lead to an inverted regime of decreasing energy-transfer efficiency
78. The lower-case subscripts designate "preparation," "waiting," and "delay
79. Experiments on fluorescence detection of femtosecond accumulated photon echoes have measured a similar quantity that is quadrilinear in the field amplitudes of phase-related continuous wave beams. The time resolution in those experiments was set by the field correlation time of a continuous-wave laser rather than the pulse duration. K. Uchikawa, H. Ohsawa, T. Suga, and S. Saikan, Opt. Lett. 16, 13 (1991)
80. S. Saikan, K. Uchikawa, and H. Ohsawa, ibid. 16, 10 (1991)
81. We set ℏ = 1 throughout this paper
82. nO
83. † = - I
84. I+H.c
85. 0>
86. uπ/2 associated with the energy-transfer process, which our amplitude-sensitive measurements will be able to detect
87. An experimental strategy for isolating the interference contribution to the population of a given electronic state with beam choppers and lock-in amplifiers was demonstrated in Refs. 1 and 2
88. We use notation in which a bra retains the name of the ket to which it is dual:
89. I
90. P. Andrews and W. L. Barnes, Science 290, 785 (2000)
91. w allows us to regard the interpulse-pair phase shifts as random variables. For a detailed discussion of the relationship between phase shifts and time delays, see Ref. 3
92. D. Keusters, H.-S. Tan, and W. S. Warren, J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 10369 (1999)
93. D. Keusters, P. Tian, and W. S. Warren, in The Thirteenth International Conference on Ultrafast Phenomena, OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics, Vol. 72, OSA Technical Digest, Postconference Edition (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 2002), pp. 480-481
94. A rudimentary example of phase-cycling in linear ultrafast spectroscopy can be found in Ref. 2. There it was shown that in-phase and in-quadrature interferograms could be combined to yield the resonant part of the time-dependent linear dipole susceptibility
95. x polarization (see Appendix A) is observation-time independent. For both polarization combinations, however, it may be desirable in cases of relatively strong energy-transfer coupling to time gate the measurement of acceptor-state population - on about a picosecond time scale - in order to ensure that the portion linear in J dominates the acceptor-state population
96. d interval of (backwards) motion in state 2. This interesting elementary feature of the transferred amplitude's motion in an energy-transfer system does not seem to have been noted previously
97. vib/2
98. 6. The interference signals presented here supersede the preliminary calculations of D. Kilin and J. A. Cina, Ultrafast Phenomena (Springer, Berlin, in press), Vol. 13, conference proceedings. The latter calculations were performed less accurately, by numerical diagonalization of the one-exciton subspace in the presence of a small specified value for J
99. There does not appear to be any fundamental reason why fluorescence-detected wave packet interferometry signals could not be measured on single molecules; in which case the issue of inhomogeneous broadening would be moot if the site energies were stable for the duration of data acquisition
100. See Chap. 10 of Shaul Mukamel's book, cited in Ref. 13
101. V. Szöcs, T. Pálszegi, a. Torschanoff, and H. F. Kaufmann, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 8218 (2002)
102. This issue is addressed, however, by O. Golonzka and A. Tokmakoff, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 297 (2001)
103. J. A. Cina and R. A. Harris, Ultrafast Phenomena IX, edited by W. Knox and P. Barbara (Springer, Berlin, 1994), p. 486
104. R. Silbey and R. A. Harris, J. Phys. Chem. 93, 7062 (1989)
105. S. Jang, J. Cao, and R. J. Silbey, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 2705 (2002)
106. 2 due to electronic energy transfer. The corresponding quadrilinear signal should be resistant to degradation by orientational disorder, and even provide useful amplitude-level information from a randomly oriented sample
107. w. It is worth noting that the C and D terms can more generally be separated from each other by phase cycling, which isolates A + D and B + C. See Ref. 26
108. v, Quantum Mechanics Vol. 1 (Wiley, New York, 1977)
109. E. J. Heller, J. Chem. Phys. 62, 1544 (1975)