Ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm shown by three-person groups with high or low state self-esteem

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 149-162

  Petersen, Lars Eric ^a   Blank, Hartmut ^b  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037240552     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.137     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aberson, C. L., Healy, M., & Romero, V. (2000). Ingroup bias and self-esteem: a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 157-173.
2. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334.
3. Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorisation and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-52.
4. Blank, H. (1997). Cooperative participants discriminate (not always): a logic of conversation approach to the minimal group paradigm. Current Research in Social Psychology, 2, 38-49. http://www.uiowa.edu/̃grpproc/crisp/crisp.2.5.htm.
5. Bornstein, G., Crum, L., Wittenbraker, J., Harring, K., Insko, C. A., & Thibaut, J. (1983). On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 321-350.
6. Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal group situation: a cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
7. Brockner, J. (1983). Low self-esteem and behavioral plasticity: some implications. In L. Wheeler, & P. Shaver (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 237-271). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Brown, J. D. (1993). Motivational conflict and the self: the double-bind on low self-esteem. In R. S. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 117-130). New York: Plenum.
9. Brown, J. D., Collins, R. L., & Schmidt, G. W. (1988). Self-esteem and direct versus indirect forms of self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 445-453.
10. Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60-67.
11. Diehl, M. (1984). Dichotomie und Distribution: Determinanten der Diskriminierung im Paradigma der minimalen Gruppen. [Dichotomy and distribution: Determinations of discrimination in the minimal group paradigm]. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation. Institut für Psychologie, Tübingen.
12. Diehl, M. (1989a). Justice and discrimination between minimal groups: the limits of equity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 227-238.
13. Diehl, M. (1989b). Dichotomie und Diskriminierung: Die Auswirkungen von Kreuzkategorisierungen auf die Diskriminierung im Paradigma der minimalen Gruppen [Dichotomy and discrimination: the effects of cross-categorizations on discrimination in the minimal group paradigm]. Zeitschrift f̈r Sozialpsychologie, 20, 92-102.
14. Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. A. (2001). On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm: norms as moderators of the expression of ingroup bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 143-154.
15. Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.
16. Hertel, G., & Kerr, N. L. (2001). Priming in-group favoritism: the impact of normative scripts in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 316-324.
17. Hogg, M. A., & Sunderland, J. (1991). Self-esteem and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 51-62.
18. Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C. W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der 'Positive and Negative Affect Schedule' (PANAS) [Investigations with a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)]. Diagnostica, 42, 139-156.
19. Long, K., & Spears, R. (1997). The self-esteem hypothesis revisited: differentiation and the disaffected. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 296-317). Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: self-evalution of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
21. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). In-group bias as a function of salience, relevance and status: an integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
22. Mummendey, A. (1995). Positive distinctiveness and social discrimination: an old couple living in divorce. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 657-670.
23. Mummendey, A., Simon, B., Dietze, C., Grünert, M., Haeger, G., Kessler, S., Lettgen, S., & Schäferhoff, S. (1992). Categorization is not enough: intergroup discrimination in negative outcome allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 125-144.
24. Petersen, L.-E., & Blank, H. (2001). Reale Gruppen im Paradigma der minimalen Gruppen: Wirkt die Gruppensituation als Korrektiv oder Katalysator sozialer Diskriminierung? [Real groups in the minimal group paradigm: does the group context work as corrective or catalyst of social discrimination]. Zeitschrift fuer Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 304-318.
25. Reichl, A. J. (1997). Ingroup favouritism and outgroup favouritism in low status minimal groups: differential responses to status-related and status-unrelated measures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 617-633.
26. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102.
28. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorisation and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
29. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
30. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
31. Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187-204.
32. Vester, F. (1991). Computerprogramm Oekolopoly. Munich: Studiengruppe für Biologie und Umwelt GmbH.
33. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.