On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm: Norms as moderators of the expression of intergroup bias

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 143-154

  Gaertner, Lowell ^b   Insko, Chester A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035263741     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.28     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allport GW. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
2. Baumeister RF, Leary MR. 1995. The need to belong: Desire for Interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117: 497-529.
3. Billig M, Tajfel H. 1973. Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 3: 27-51.
4. Blanz N, Mummendey A, Otten S. 1997. Normative evaluations and frequency expectations regarding positive versus negative outcome allocations between groups. European Journal of Social Psychology 27: 165-176.
5. Bornstein G, Crum L, Wittenbraker J, Harring K, Insko CA, Thibaut J. 1983a. On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology 13: 321-350.
6. Bornstein G, Crum L, Wittenbraker J, Harring K, Insko CA, Thibaut J. 1983b. Reply to Turner's comments. European Journal of Social Psychology 13: 369-381.
7. Brewer MB. 1979. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin 86: 307-324.
8. Chin WG, McClintock CG. 1993. The effects of intergroup discrimination and social values on level of self-esteem in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology 23: 63-75.
9. Cohen J. 1969. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press: New York.
10. Franco FM, Maass A. 1999. Intentional control over prejudice: When the choice of the measure matters. European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 469-477.
11. Gaertner L, Insko CA. 2000. Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79: 77-94.
12. Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF. 1986. The aversive form of racism. In Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL (eds). Academic Press: Orlando, FLA; 61-90.
13. Gagnon A, Bourhis RY. 1996. Discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Social identity or self-interest? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22: 1289-1301.
14. Grzelak JL, Poppe M, Czwartosz Z, Nowak A. 1988. Numerical trap: A new look at outcome representation in studies on choice behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology 18: 143-159.
15. Hertel G, Kerr NL. in press. Priming ingroup favoritism: The impact of normative scripts in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
16. Insko CA, Schopler J. 1987. Categorization, competition, and collectivity. In Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Hendrick C (ed.). Sage: New York; 213-251.
17. Jetten J, Spears R, Manstead ASR. 1996. Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 1222-1233.
18. Kelley HH, Thibaut JW. 1978. Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. Wiley Interscience: New York.
19. Locksley A, Ortiz V, Hepburn C. 1980. Social categorization and discriminatory behavior: Extinguishing the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 773-783.
20. Platow MJ, McClintock CG, Liebrand WBG. 1990. Predicting intergroup fairness and ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology 20: 221-239.
21. Rabbie JM, Lodewijkx H. 1994. Conflict and aggression: An individual-group continuum. Advances in Group Processes 2: 139-174.
22. Rabbie JM, Schot JC. 1990. Group behaviour in the minimal group paradigm: fact or fiction? In, European Perspectives in Psychology (Vol. 3), Drenth PJ, Sergeant JA, Takens RJ (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 251-263.
23. Rabbie JM, Schot JC, Visser L. 1989. Social identity theory: a conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioral interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology 19: 171-202.
24. Rutte CG, Messick DM. 1996. Detecting salary discrimination against male and female managers. European Journal of Social Psychology 26: 727-740.
25. Schopler J, Insko CA, Graetz KA, Drigotas S, Smith VA, Dahl K. 1993. Individual-group discontinuity: Further evidence for mediation by fear and greed. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19: 419-431.
26. Tajfel H. 1970. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American 223: 96-102.
27. Tajfel H, Billig M. 1974. Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 10: 159-170.
28. Tajfel H, Billig M, Bundy RP, Flament C. 1971. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology 1: 149-178.
29. Tajfel H, Turner JC. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin WG, Worchel S (eds). The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Brooks/Cole: Monterey, CA; 33-47.
30. Turner JC. 1983a. Some comments on… 'The measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm,' European Journal of Social Psychology 13: 351-367.
31. Turner JC. 1983a. A second reply to Bornstein, Crum, Wittenbraker, Harring, Insko, and Thibaut on the measurement of social orientations. European Journal of Social Psychology 13: 383-387.
32. Yamagishi T, Jin N, Kiyonari T. 1999. Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Advances in Group Processes 16: 161-197.