Cooperative participants discriminate (not always): A logic of conversation approach to the minimal group paradigm

Current Research in Social Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 1-14

  Blank, Hartmut ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142114892     PISSN: 10887423     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Berkowitz, N. H. (1994). Evidence that subjects' expectancies confound intergroup bias in Tajfel's minimal group paradigm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 184-195.
2. Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1) (pp. 263-292). Chichester, England: John Wiley.
3. Gerard, H. B., and Hoyt, M. F. (1974). Distinctiveness of social categorization and attitude toward ingroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 836-842.
4. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
5. Hilton, D. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 248-271.
6. St. Claire, L., and Turner, J. C. (1982). The role of demand characteristics in the social categorization paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 307-314.
7. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R., and Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
8. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.