Relationships between conscientiousness, self-efficacy, self-deception, and learning over time

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 87, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1175-1182

  Lee, Sunhee ^a,b   Klein, Howard J ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Ohio Department of Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSCIENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECUMBENCY; SELF CONCEPT; TIME;

ADULT; CONSCIENCE; DECEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF EFFICACY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0036985104     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1175     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
3. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationship between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.
4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1996). Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 261-272.
5. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
6. Chen, G., Casper, W. J., & Cortina, J. M. (2001). The role of self-efficacy and task complexity in the relationships among cognitive ability, conscientiousness, self-efficacy, and work-related performance: A meta-analytic examination. Human Performance, 14, 209-230.
7. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678-707.
8. Colquitt, J. A., & Simmering, M. J. (1998). Conscientiousness, goal orientation, and motivation to learn during the learning process: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 654-665.
9. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
10. George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2000). The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 26, 657-684.
11. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
12. Helmreich, R. L., Sawin, L. L., & Carsrud, A. L. (1986). The honeymoon effect in job performance: Temporal increases in the predictive power of achievement motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 185-188.
13. Hogan, J., & Ones, D. S. (1997). Conscientiousness and integrity at work. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 849-870). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Johnson, E. A., Vincent, N., & Ross, L. (1997). Self-deception versus self-esteem in buffering the negative effects of failure. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 385-405.
15. Jörkeskog, K. G., & Sörbom. D. (2004). LISREL 8.5. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
16. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Brown, K. G., Salas, E., Smith, E. M., & Nason, E. R. (2001). Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multi-dimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 1-31.
17. Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1994). Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 364-369.
18. Martocchio, J. J., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: Mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 764-773.
19. Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees' attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736-749.
20. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In K. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Sackeim, H. A. (1983). Self-deception, self-esteem, and depression: The adaptive value of lying to oneself. In J. Masling (Ed.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytical theories (pp. 101-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-42.
23. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Steele-Johnson, D., Beauregard, R. S., Hoover, P. B., & Schmidt, A. M. (2000). Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 724-738.
25. Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. (1980, June). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
26. Stevens, C. K., & Gist, M. E. (1997). Effects of self-efficacy and goal-orientation training on negotiation skill maintenance: What are the mechanisms? Personnel Psychology, 50, 955-978.
27. Tannenbaum, S. I., & Yukl, G. (1992). Training and development in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 399-441.
28. Vande Walle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. J. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 629-640.