An assessment and refinement of Jehn's intragroup conflict scale

International Journal of Conflict Management

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 110-126

  Pearson, Allison W ^a   Ensley, Michael D ^b   Amason, Allen C ^c  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036958945     PISSN: 10444068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb022870     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148.
2. Amason, A. C., & Mooney, A. C. (1999). The effects of past performance on top management team conflict in strategic decision making. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 340-359.
3. Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23, 495-516.
4. Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making and organizational performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 239-253.
5. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
7. Brehmer, B. (1976). Social judgement theory and the analysis of interpersonal conflict. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 985-1003.
8. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
9. Cachon, J. C. (1990). A longitudinal investigation of entrepreneurial teams, part one: Who is involved and what makes them succeed. In N. C. Churchill, W. D. Bygrave, J. A. Hornaday, D. F. Muzyka, K. H. Vesper, & W. E. Wetzel, (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 100-102). Wellesley, MA: Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, Babson College.
10. Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., & Carland, J. A. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9, 354-359.
11. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. C. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
12. Elron, E. (1997). Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. Leadership Quarterly, 8, 393-413.
13. Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. (2000). Understanding the Dynamics of the new venture top management team: Conflict, cohesion, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 365-386.
14. Ensley, M. D., & Amason, A. C. (1999) Entrepreneurial team heterogeneity and the moderating effects of environmental volatility and team tenure on new venture performance. In W. D. Bygrave, S. Manigart, C. M. Mason, G. D. Meyer, H. A. Sapienza, & K. G. Shaver (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 111-118). Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
15. Gladstein, D. L. (1984). A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
16. Guetzkow, H., & Gyr, J. (1954). An analysis of conflict in decision-making groups. Human Relations, 7, 367-381.
17. Hare, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Sage.
18. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
19. Hickson, D. J., Butler, R. J., Cray, D., Mallory, G. R., & Wilson, D. C. (1986). Top decisions: Strategic decision-making in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of the scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967-988.
21. Jackson, S. E. (1992). Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. In P. Shrivastava, A. Huff, & J. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (pp. 345-382). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
22. wg: An assessment of within group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
23. Janssen, O., Van De Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25, 117-142.
24. Jehn, K. A. (1992). The impact of intragroup conflict on effectiveness: A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of conflict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.
25. Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223-238.
26. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
27. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530-557.
28. Jehn, K. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (4), 741-764.
29. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-764.
30. Kamm, J. B., Shuman, J. C., Seeger, J. A., & Nurick, A. J. (1990). Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: A research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14 (4), 7-17.
31. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variable models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33. Naumann, S. E., & Bennett, N. (2000). A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 881-880.
34. Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
35. Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 17, 615-631.
36. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-29.
37. Pinkley, R. (1990). Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 117-126.
38. Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marsh-field, MA: Pittman.
39. Priem, R., & Price, K. (1991). Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making. Group and Organization Studies, 16, 206-225.
40. Roure, J. B., & Maidique, M. A. (1986). Linking prefunding factors and high-technology venture success: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 295-306.
41. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 63, 650-653.
42. Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validation in organization behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 3-43). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
43. Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 745-772.
44. Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 745-772.
45. Simons, T., & Peterson, R. (1999). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102-111.
46. Stewart, W. H., Jr., Watson, W. E., Carland, J. C., & Carland, J. W., Jr. (1999). A proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers. Journal of Business Venturing 14 (2), 189-214.
47. Wall, V., & Nolan, L. N. (1986). Perceptions of inequity, satisfaction, and conflict in task oriented groups. Human Relations, 39, 1033-1052.
48. Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W. (1990). The strategy process, middle management involvement and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 231-241.