Dilemmas of appraisal

European Management Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 620-629

  Wilson, Fiona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Appraised schemes; Gender; Performance appraisals; Women academics

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036898740     PISSN: 02632373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00113-5     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (1991) Industrial Performance Review in the NHS. The Institute of Health Services Management.
2. Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (1993) Women in management: organizational socialization and assessment practices that prevent career advancement. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 1(2), 68-83.
3. Anon (1990) Goodwill Under Stress. AUT publications, London.
4. Arthur, T.A. and Robertson, I.T. (1993) An Evaluation of the Performance Appraisal System at a UK University and the Role of Interpersonal Relations in the Appraisal Interview. Working Paper, Manchester School of Management, UMIST.
5. Bagilhole, B.A. (1993a) How to keep a good woman down: an investigation of the role of institutional factors in the process of discrimination against women academics. British Journal of Sociology of Education 14(3), 261-276.
6. Bagilhole, B. (1993b) Survivor in a male preserve: a study of British women academics' experiences and perceptions of discrimination in a UK university. Higher Education 26, 431-447.
7. Ball, S.J. (1990) Management as moral technology: a Luddite analysis. In Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge, ed. S.J. Ball. Routledge, London.
8. Banks, C. and Murphy, K. (1985) Toward narrowing the research-practice gap in performance appraisal. Personnel Psychology 38, 335-345.
9. Barlow, G. (1989) Deficiencies and the perpetuation of power: latent function in management appraisal. Journal of Management Studies 26(5), 499-518.
10. Beer, M. (1985) Note on performance appraisal. In Readings in Human Resource Management, eds M. Beer and B. Spector. Free Press, New York.
11. Bennet, R. (1986) How performance appraisals hurt women managers. Women in Management Review Autumn, 151-153.
12. Butler, K. (1993) Towards a bias free workplace. Training and Development (USA) 47(11), 47-49.
13. Coates, G. (1994) Performance appraisal as icon: oscar-winning performance or dressing to impress? The International Journal of Human Resource Management 5(1).
14. Colwill, N.L. (1982) The New Partnership: Women and Men in Organisation. Mayfield Publishing Co, Palo Alto, CA.
15. Davies, C. and Holloway, P. (1995) Troubling transformations: gender regimes and organizational culture in the academy. In Feminist Academics: Creative Agents for Change, eds L. Morley and V. Walsh. Taylor and Francis, London.
16. Dipboye, R.L. (1985) Some neglected variables in research on discrimination in appraisal. Academy of Management Review 10(1), 116-127.
17. Dorfman, J. (1961) Thorstein Veblen and his America. Augustus M. Kelley, New York.
18. Edwards, M.R. (1989) Making performance appraisals meaningful and fair. Business Jul-Sept, 17-26.
19. Faith, K. (1994) Resistance: lessons from Foucault and feminism. In Power/Gender: Social Relations in Theory and Practice, eds L. Radtke and H.J. Stam. Sage, London.
20. Finkelstein, M. (1984) The American Academic Profession: A Synthesis of Social Scientific Inquiry since World War II. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH.
21. Fletcher, C. (1997) Performance appraisal in context: organizational changes and their impact on practice. In The International Handbook of Selection and Assessment, eds N. Anderson and P. Herriot. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
22. Fletcher, C. (1999) The implication of research on gender differences in self assessment and 360 degree appraisal. Human Resource Management Journal 9(1), 39-46.
23. Fletcher, C. and Williams, R. (1985) Performance Appraisal and Career Development. Hutchinson, London.
24. Foreman-Peck, L. (1992) Appraising appraisal from a woman's point of view; implications for staff development. In G. Wisker (ed.) What's So Special About Women in Higher Education? SCED paper no 67, March.
25. Grey, C. (1994) Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline. Sociology 28(2), 479-498.
26. Grint, K. (1993) What's wrong with performance appraisals? A critique and a suggestion. Human Resource Management Journal 3(3), 61-77.
27. Grint, K. (1995) From silent monitors: the long and relatively unhappy life of management appraisals. In Management: A Sociological Introduction, ed. K. Grint. Polity Press, London.
28. Grote, D. (2000) Performance appraisal reappraised. Harvard Business Review 78(1), 21.
29. Guilford, J.P. (1954) Psychometric Methods. McGraw Hill, New York.
30. Halsey, A.H. (1992) Decline of Donnish Dominion: The British Academic Profession in the Twentieth Century. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
31. Haslam, C., Bryman, A. and Webb, A. (1991) The Introduction of University Staff Appraisal. Department of Social Sciences, University of Loughborough.
32. Heilman, M.E. (1983) Sex bias in work settings: the lack of fit model. In Research in Organisational Behaviour, eds L.L. Cummings and B. Staw, pp. 269-298. JAI Press, New York.
33. Jarratt, A. (1985) Report of the Steering Committee for the Efficiency Studies in Universities. Committee of the Vice Chancellors and Principals, London.
34. Latham, G.P. (1986) Job performance and appraisal. In International Review of Organizational Psychology, eds C. Cooper and I. Robertson. Wiley, Chichester.
35. Lindeman, M., Sundvik, L. and Rouhiainen, P. (1995) Under or overestimation of self? Person variables and self assessment accuracy in work settings. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10(1), 123-134.
36. Longenecker, C.O., Sims, H.P. and Gioia, D.A. (1987) Behind the mask: the politics of employee appraisal. The Academy of Management Executive 1(3), 183-193.
37. Longenecker, C.O. and Gioia, D.A. (1988) Neglected at the top: executives talk about executive appraisal. Sloan Management Review 29(2), 41-48.
38. Longenecker, C.O. (1999) Creating effective performance appraisals. Industrial Management 41(5), 18-23.
39. Maccoby, E.E. and Jacklin, C.N. (1974) The Psychology of Sex Difference. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
40. Maurer, T.J. and Taylor, M.A. (1994) Is sex by itself enough? An exploration of gender bias issues in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60, 231-251.
41. McAuley, J. (1987) Women academics: a case study in inequality. In In a Man's World: Essays of Women in Maledominated Professions, eds A. Spencer and D. Podmore. Tavistock, London.
42. McGregor, D. (1957) An uneasy look at performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review 35, 89-94.
43. Morris, M. and Patton, P. (1979) (Eds) Michel Foucault: Power, Truth and Strategy. Feral Publications, Sydney.
44. Newton, T., Handy, J. and Fineman, S. (1995) (Eds) Managing Stress. Sage, London.
45. Newton, T. and Findlay, P. (1996) Playing God? The performance of appraisal. Human Resource Management Journal 6(3), 42-58.
46. Nieva, V.F. and Gutek, B.A. (1980) Sex effects of evaluation. Academy of Management Review 5(2), 267-276.
47. Prichard, C. and Wilmott, H. (1997) Just how managed is the McUniversity. Organization Studies 18, 287-316.
48. Redman, T., Snape, E., Thompson, D. and Ka-ching Yan, F. (2000) Performance appraisal in an NHS hospital. Human Resource Management Journal 10(1), 48-62.
49. Ridley, T.M. (1992) Motivating and Rewarding Employees: Some Aspects of Theory and Practice, ACAS Occasional Paper, no.51. ACAS, London.
50. Rotunda, M. and Sackett, P.R. (1999) Effect of rater race on conclusions regarding differential prediction in cognitive ability tests. Journal of Applied Psychology 84(5), 815-822.
51. Sackett, P.R., Dubois, G.L. and Noe, A.W. (1991) Tokenism in performance evaluation: the effects of work group representation on male, female and white-black differences in performance rations. Journal of Applied Psychology 76(2), 262-267.
52. Salaman, G. (1979) Work Organizations: Resistance and Control. Longman, London.
53. Smither, J.W. ed. (1998) Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice. Jossey Bass, San Francisco.
54. Smither, R.D. (1988) The Psychology of Work and Human Performance, Harper and Row, New York.
55. Stuart, P. (1992) What does the glass ceiling cost you? Personnel Journal (USA) 71(11), 70-80.
56. Swan, W.S. (1991) How to do a Superior Performance Appraisal. John Wiley, New York.
57. Thomas, R. (1996a) All Talk and No Action? The Failure of Academic Appraisal in the Gendered Academy. Paper prepared for Speaking Our Place: Women's Perspectives on Higher Education, WHEN Annual Conference, University of Central Lancashire, 16 March.
58. Thomas, R. (1996b) Gendered cultures and performance appraisal: the experience of women academics. Gender, Work and Organization 3(3), 143-155.
59. Townley, B. (1990) A discriminating approach to appraisal. Personnel Management December, 34-37.
60. Townley, B. (1992) In the eye of the gaze: the constitutive role of performance appraisal. In Managing Organizations, eds P. Barrar and C.L. Cooper. Routledge, London.
61. Townley, B. (1993) Performance appraisal and the emergence of management. Journal of Management Studies 30(2), 221-238.
62. Townley, B. (1994) Reframing HRM: Power, Ethics and the Subject at Work. Sage, London.
63. Townley, B. (1997) The institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organization Studies 18(2), 261-285.
64. Townley, B. (1999) Practical reason and performance appraisal. Journal of Management Studies 36(3), 287-306.
65. Tuck, K. (1992) An Exercise in Asset Stripping. Report of a seminar held at Stirling University. Report in AUT Bulletin, 5 January, AUT, London.
66. Wexley, K.N. and Yukl, G.A. (1977) Organizational Behaviour and Personnel Psychology. Richard D, Homewood, IU.
67. White, M. (1999) Performance, equality and staff development. Human Resource Management Journal 9(1), 47-54.
68. Yeates, J. (1990) Performance appraisal: a guide for design and implementation. Institute of Manpower Studies, February, report no. 188.