MR cholangiopancreatography

Radiologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1363-1376

  Fulcher, Ann S ^a   Turner, Mary Ann ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; PANCREAS DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0036893746     PISSN: 00338389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0033-8389(02)00046-5     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, et al. Dilated biliary tract: Evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991;181:805-8.
2. Barish MA, Soto JA. MR cholangiopancreatography: Techniques and clinical applications. AJR 1997;169:1295-303.
3. Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M, et al. Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: Diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1997;205:523-30.
4. Bret PM, Reinhold C, Taourel P, et al. Pancreas divisum: Evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996;199:99-103.
5. Cappeliez O, Delhaye M, Deviere J, et al. Chronic pancreatitis: Evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2000;215:358-64.
6. Fulcher AS, Capps GW, Turner MA. Thoracopancreatic fistula: Clinical and imaging findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:181-7.
7. Fulcher AS, Szucs RA, Bassignani MB, et al. Right lobe living donor liver transplantation: Preoperative evaluation of the donor with MR imaging. AJR 2001;176:1483-91.
8. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. HASTE MR cholangiography in the evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR 1997;169:1501-5.
9. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. Orthotopic liver transplantation: Evaluation with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1999;211:715-22.
10. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. Pitfalls of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:845-50.
11. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998;207:21-32.
12. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Franklin KJ, et al. Evaluation of primary sclerosing cholangitis with magnetic resonance cholangiography: A case control study. Radiology 2000;215:71-80.
13. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: Diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995;197:109-15.
14. Heverhagen JT, Muller D, Battmann A, et al. MR hydrometry to assess exocrine function of the pancreas: Initial results of noninvasive quantification of secretion. Radiology 2001;218:61-7.
15. Hirohashi S, Hirohashi R, Uchida H, et al. Pancreatitis: Evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography in children. Radiology 1997;203:411-5.
16. Irie H, Honda H, Jimi M, et al. Value of MR, cholangiopancreatography in evaluating choledochal cysts. AJR 1998;171:1381-5.
17. Kim MJ, Mitchell DG, Ito K, et al. Biliary dilatation: Differentiation of benign from malignant causes-value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2000;214:173-81.
18. Lopera JE, Soto JA, Munera F. Malignant hilar and perihilar biliary obstruction: Use of MR cholangiography to define the extent of biliary ductal involvement and plan percutaneous interventions. Radiology 2001;220:90-6.
19. Manfredi R, Costamagna G, Brizi MG, et al. Pancreas divisum and "santorinicele": Diagnosis with dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography with secretin stimulation. Radiology 2000;217:403-8.
20. Manfredi R, Costamagna G, Brizi MG, et al. Severe chronic pancreatitis versus suspected pancreatic disease: Dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2000;214:849-55.
21. Matos C, Nicaise N, Deviere J, et al. Choledochal cysts: Comparison of findings at MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in eight patients. Radiology 1998;209:443-8.
22. Mortele KJ, Ros PR. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: MR cholangiographic findings and clinical applications. AJR 2001;177:389-94.
23. Regan F, Fradin J, Khazan R, et al. Choledocholithiais: Evaluation with MR cholangiography. AJR 1996;167:1441-5.
24. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret P, et al. Choledocholithiasis: Evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 1998;209:435-42.
25. Schwartz LH, Coakley FV, Sun Y, et al. Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: Evaluation with breathhold MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR 1998;170:1491-5.
26. Sica GT, Braver J, Cooney MJ, et al. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiology 1999;210:605-10.
27. Soto JA, Barish MA, Alvarez O, et al. Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: Comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and singleand multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. Radiology 2000;215:737-45.
28. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 1996;199:91-8.
29. Tang Y, Yamashita Y, Arakawa A, et al. Pancreaticobiliary ductal system: Value of half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement MR cholangiography for postoperative evaluation. Radiology 2000;215:81-8.
30. Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: Diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996;199:521-7.
31. Varghese JC, Farrell MA, Courtney G, et al. Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with failed or inadequate ERCP. AJR 1999;173:1527-33.
32. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroentrol 2001;96:417-23.
33. Irie H, Honda H, Tajima T, et al. Optimal MR cholangiopancreatographic sequence and its clinical application. Radiology 1998;206:379-87.
34. Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, Thomasson D, et al. HASTE MR imaging: Description of technique and preliminary results in the abdomen. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:698-9.
35. Yamashita Y, Abe Y, Tang Y, et al. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: Single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique. AJR 1997;168:1449-54.
36. Laing FC. The gallbladder and bile ducts. In: Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, editors. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 2nd Edition. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1998. p. 175-223.
37. Mitchell SE, Clark RA. A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis. AJR 1984;142:729-33.
38. Baron RL. Common bile duct stones: Reassessment of criteria for CT diagnosis. Radiology 1987;162:419-24.
39. Cohen SA, Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Abdom Imaging 1996;21:385-94.
40. Cotton PB, Chong WK. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and therapy. In: Silvis SE, Rohrmann CA, Ansel HJ, editors. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. New York: IgakuShoin; 1995. p. 446-50.
41. Sherman S, Lehman GA. ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Pancreas 1991;6:350-67.
42. Frey CF, Burbige EJ, Meinke WB, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Surg 1982;144:109-14.
43. Watanabe Y, Dohke M, Ishimori T, et al. Pseudo-obstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct due to artifact from arterial pulsatile compression: A diagnostic pitfall of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2000;214:856-60.
44. Freeny PC, Bilbao MK, Katon RM. "Blind" evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma: The "double duct" and other signs. Radiology 1976;119:271-4.
45. Adamek HE, Albert J, Breer H, et al. Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A prospective controlled study. Lancet 2000;356:190-3.
46. Huang TL, Cheng YF, Chen CL, et al. Variants of the bile ducts: Clinical application in the potential donor of living-related hepatic transplantation. Transplant Proc 1996;28:1669-70.
47. Suhocki PV, Meyers WC. Injury to aberrant bile ducts during cholecystectomy: A common cause of diagnostic error and treatment delay. AJR 1999;172:955-9.
48. Bernard JP, Sahel J, Giovanni M, et al. Pancreas divisum is a probable cause of acute pancreatitis: A report of 137 cases. Pancreas 1990;5:248-54.
49. Millbourn E. On the excretory ducts of the pancreas in man, with special reference to their relationships to each other, the common bile duct and to the duodenum. Acta Anat 1950;9:1-34.
50. Morgan DE, Logan K, Baron TH, et al. Pancreas divisum: Implications for diagnostic and therapeutic pancreatography. AJR 1999;173:193-8.
51. MacCarty RL, LaRusso NF, Wiesner RH, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: Findings on cholangiography and pancreatography. Radiology 1983;149:39-44.