Severe chronic pancreatitis versus suspected pancreatic disease: Dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation

Radiology

Volumn 214, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 849-855

  Manfredi, Riccardo ^a   Costamagna, Guido ^a   Brizi, Mari̊a G ^a   Maresca, Giulia ^a   Vecchioli, Amorino ^a   Colagrande, Corrado ^b   Marano, Pasquale ^a  

^a FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO UNIVERSITARIO A GEMELLI IRCCS   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); Magnetic resonance (MR), rapid imaging; Pancreas, function; Pancreas, MR; Pancreatic ducts; Pancreatitis; Secretin

Indexed keywords

SECRETIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD;

EID: 0034091862     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.214.3.r00mr24849     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Sarner M, Cotton PB. Classification of pancreatitis: report of an international symposium at Cambridge. Gut 1984; 25:756-759.
2. Axon ATR. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in chronic pancreatitis: Cambridge classification. Radiol Clin North Am 1989; 27:39-50.
3. Devière J, Gulbis B, Delhaye M, Quenon M, Cremer M. Relation entre la morphologie canalaire et la fonction exocrine du pancreas: une méthode originale d'estimation linéaire de la fonction pancréatique. Acta Endosc 1985; 15:403-414.
4. Zimmon DS, Falkenstein DB, Riccobono C, Aaron B. Complication of endoscopic retrograde: analysis of 300 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology 1975; 69:303-309.
5. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Kanton RM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10.00 cases. Gastroenterology 1976; 70:314-320.
6. Hall-Crags MA, Alle CM, Owens CM, et al. MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology 1989; 189:423-427.
7. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991; 181:805-808.
8. Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T, et al. Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology 1992; 183:578-580.
9. Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Sekjima JH, et al. Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique. Radiology 1995; 196:227-232.
10. Reinhold C, Bret P. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 166:1285-1295.
11. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995; 197: 109-115.
12. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of the biliary tree with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: initial clinical experience. Ital J Gastroenterol 1996; 28:63-69.
13. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Ferrucci JT. MR cholangiopancreatography: findings on 3D fast spin-echo imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:1397-1401.
14. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995; 196:459-464.
15. Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Touama N, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long echo train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis. Radiology 1994; 192:73-78.
16. Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, Yamamoto H, Urata J, Takahashi M. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:1297-1303.
17. Dreiling DA, Messer J. The secretin story. Am J Gastroenterol 1978; 70:455-479.
18. Bolondi L, Gaiani S, Gullo L, Labò G. Secretin administration induces a dilatation of the main pancreatic duct. Dig Dis Sci 1984; 29:802-808.
19. Glaser J, Hogemann B, Krummenerl T, et al. Sonographic imaging of the pancreatic duct: new diagnostic possibilities using secretin stimulation. Dig Dis Sci 1987; 32:1075-1081.
20. Lowes JR, Lees WR, Cotton PB. Pancreatic duct dilation after secretin stimulation in patients with pancreas divisum. Pancreas 1989;4:371-374.
21. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, et al. Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 1997; 203:435-441.
22. Takehara Y. Can MRCP replace ERCP? J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8:517-534.
23. Nicaise N, Pellet O, Metens T, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: interest of IV secretin administration in the evaluation of pancreatic ducts. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:16-22.
24. Manfredi R, Costamagna G, Vecchioli A, Spina S, Colagrande C, Marano P. Dynamic magnetic resonance pancreatography after secretin stimulation in chronic pancreatitis. Radiol Med 1998; 6:226-231.
25. Luetmer PH, Stephens DH, Ward EM. Chronic pancreatitis reassessment with current CT. Radiology 1989; 171:353-357.
26. Niderau C, Grendell J. Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 1985; 88: 1973-1995.
27. Robberecht P, Cremer M, Vandermeers A, et al. Pancreatic secretion of total protein and of three hydrolases collected in healthy subjects via duodenoscopic cannulation. Gastroenterology 1975; 69:374-379.
28. Bret PM, Reinhold C, Taourel P, Guidaud L, Atri M, Barkun AN. Pancreas divisum: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996; 199:99-103.
29. Warshaw AL, Simeone JF, Schapiro RH, Flavin-Warshaw B. Evaluation and treatment of the dominant dorsal duct syndrome (pancreas divisum redefined). Am J Surg 1990; 159:59-64.