Optimal MR cholangiopancreatographic sequence and its clinical application

Radiology

Volumn 206, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 379-387

  Irie, Hiroyuki ^a   Honda, Hiroshi ^a   Tajima, Tsuyoshi ^a   Kuroiwa, Toshiro ^a   Yoshimitsu, Kengo ^a   Makisumi, Kenji ^a   Masuda, Kouji ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies; Pancreas, MR; Pancreatic ducts; Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS DUCT STENOSIS; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0031952907     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.206.2.9457189     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted CE-FAST sequence. Radiology 1991; 181:805-808.
2. Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T, et al. Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology 1992; 183:578-580.
3. Hall-Craggs MA, Allen CM, Owens CM, et al. MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology 1993; 189:423-427.
4. Ishizaki Y, Wakayama T, Okada Y, Kobayashi T. Magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of obstructive jaundice. Am J Gastoroenterol 1993; 88:2072-2077.
5. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun ANG. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography. AJR 1994; 163:847-850.
6. Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Sekijima JH, et al. Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique. Radiology 1995; 196:227-232.
7. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995; 197: 109-115.
8. Chan Y, Chan ACW, Lam WWM, et al. Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996; 200:85-89.
9. Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Tooyama N, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis. Radiology 1994; 192:73-78.
10. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995; 196:459-464.
11. Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR 1995; 165:295-300.
12. Regan F, Smith D, Khazan R, et al. MR cholangiography in biliary obstruction using half-Fourier acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:627-632.
13. Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, Yamamoto H, Urata J, Takahashi M. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR 1996; 166: 1297-1303.
14. Ichikawa T, Nitatori T, Hachiya J, Mizutani Y. Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography with half-averaged single shot hybrid rare acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence: comparison of fast GRE and SE sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:798-802.
15. Itai Y. Different terms for the same disease: intraductal mucin-producing tumor versus mucinous tumor of the pancreas (letter). Radiology 1996; 200:285.
16. Itoh S, Yamakawa K, Shimamoto K, Endo T, Ishigaki T. CT findings in groove pancreatitis: correlation with histopathologic findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18:911-915.
17. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986; 21:720-733.
18. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24:234-245.
19. Denys A, Arrivé L, Servois V, et al. Hepatic tumors: detection and characterization at 1-T MR imaging enhanced with AMI-25. Radiology 1994; 193:665-669.
20. Reinhold C, Guibaud L, Genin G, Bret PM. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between two-dimensional fast spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-echo pulse sequences. JMRI 1995; 4:379-384.
21. Barish MA, Soto JA, Shah J, et al. 3D multislab turbo spin echo: a novel technique for MR cholangiography (abstr). In: Proceedings of the First Meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance. Berkeley, Calif: Society of Mangetic Resonace, 1994; 297.
22. Outwater EK, Gordon SJ. Imaging the pancreatic and biliary ducts with MR. Radiology 1994; 192:19-21.
23. Yamashita Y, Abe Y, Tang J, Urata J, Sumi S, Takahashi M. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique. AJR 1997; 168:1449-1454.
24. Matos C, Metens T, Devière J, et al. Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 1997; 203:435-441.
25. Freeny PC. Radiology of the pancreas: diagnostic and interventional techniques. In: Margulis AR, Burhenne HJ, eds. Alimentary tract radiology. 4th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1989; 1113-1121.
26. Tsuchiya R, Noda T, Harada N, et al. Collective review of small carcinomas of the pancreas. Ann Surg 1986; 203:77-81.