Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: Diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography

Radiology

Volumn 205, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 523-530

  Becker, Christoph D ^a   Grossholz, Marianne ^a   Becker, Minerva ^a   Mentha, Gilles ^a   De Peyer, Raymond ^a   Terrier, François ^a  

^a University Hospital   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bile ducts, calculi; Bile ducts, MR; Bile ducts, neoplasms; Bile ducts, stenosis or obstruction; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); Gadolinium; Mirizzi syndrome; Pancreas, neoplasms; Pancreatic ducts; Pancreatic ducts, MR

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CHILD; COMMON BILE DUCT CYST; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIRIZZI SYNDROME; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY;

EID: 0030704320     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356639     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Sherman S, Lehman G. ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Pancreas 1991; 3:350-367.
2. Cohen SA, Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Abdom Imaging 1996; 21:385-394.
3. Reinhold C, Bret PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR 1996; 166:1285-1295.
4. Becker CD, GrosshoLz M, Mentha G, de Peyer R, Terrier F. MR cholangio-pancreatography: technique, potential indications, and diagnostic features of benign, malignant, and postoperative conditions. Eur Radiol 1997;7:865-874.
5. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun ANG. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995; 197:109-115.
6. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopie retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996; 110:589-597.
7. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. MR cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) at 0.5 T: technique optimisation and preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1996; 6:147-152.
8. Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Barkun A, Atri M. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1996; 199:521-527.
9. Reuther G, Kiefer B, Tuchmann A. Cholangiography before biliary surgery: single-shot MR cholangiography versus intravenous cholangiography. Radiology 1996: 198:561-566.
10. Davies M, Fleiss JL. Measuring agreement for multinomial data. Biometrics 1982; 38:1047-1051.
11. Gross BH, Harter L, Gore RM, et al. Ultrasonic evaluation of common bile duct stones: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1983; 146:471-475.
12. Mitchell SE, Clark RA. A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis. AJR 1984; 142:729-733.
13. Baron RL. Common bile duct stones: reassessment of criteria for CT diagnosis. Radiology 1987; 162:419-424.
14. Van Beers BE, La Crosse M, Trigaux JP, de Cannière L, de Ronde TD, Pringot J. Noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree before and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography. AJR 1994; 162:1331-1335.
15. Fleischmann D, Ringl H, Schöfl R, et al. Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996; 198:861-868.
16. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced FAST sequence. Radiology 1991; 181:805-808.
17. Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T, et al. Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology 1992; 183:578-580.
18. Hall-Craggs MA, Allen CM, Owens CM, et al. MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology 1993; 189:423-427.
19. Reinhold C, Guibaud, L, Genin G, Bret PM. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between two-dimensional fast spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-echo pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 4:379-384.
20. Ichikawa T, Nitatori T, Hachiya J, Mizutani Y. Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography with half-averaged single-shot hybrid rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence: comparison of fast GRE and SE sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:798-802.
21. Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Sekijima JH, et al. Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique. Radiology 1995; 196:227-232.
22. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun A. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography. AJR 1994; 163: 847-850.
23. Bret PM, Reinhold C, Taourel P, Guibaud L, Atri M, Barkun AN. Pancreas divisum: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996; 199:99-103.
24. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT. MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful ERCP. Radiology 1996; 199:91-98.
25. Laubenberger J, Büchert M, Schneider B, Blum U, Hennig J, Langer M. Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance-cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP): a new method for the examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:18-23.
26. Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame H, Urata J, Takahashi M. MR cholangiography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR 1996; 166:1297-1303.
27. Pasanen P, Partanen K, Pikkarainen P, Alhava E, Pirinen A, Janatuinen E. Ultrasonography, CT, and ERCP in the diagnosis of choledochal stones. Acta Radiol 1992; 33:53-56.
28. Frey CF, Burbige EJ, Meinke WB, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Surg 1982; 144:109-114.