Biliary dilatation: Differentiation of benign from malignant causes - Value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography

Radiology

Volumn 214, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 173-181

  Kim, Myeong Jin ^a,b   Mitchell, Donald G ^a   Ito, Katsuyoshi ^a,c   Outwater, Eric K ^a  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c YAMAGUCHI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bile ducts, abnormalities; Bile ducts, calculi; Bile ducts, diseases; Bile ducts, stenosis or obstruction; Gastrointestinal tract, neoplasms; Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT DILATATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL TUMOR; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

EID: 0033985528     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.214.1.r00ja35173     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998; 207:21-32.
2. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995; 197:109-115.
3. Chan YL, Chan ACW, Lam WWM, et al. Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopie retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996; 200:85-89.
4. Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, et al. MR cholangiography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR 1995; 165:295-300.
5. Regan H Fradin J, Khazan R, Bohlman M, Magnuson T. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiography. AJR 1996; 167:1441-1445.
6. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, et al. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 1998; 209;435-442.
7. Park MS, Yu JS, Kim YH, Kim MJ, Kim JH, Lee S. Acute cholecystitis: comparison of MR cholangiography and US. Radiology 1998; 209:781-785.
8. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, et al. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991; 181:805-808.
9. Ishizaki Y, Wakayama T, Okada Y, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of obstructive jaundice. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88:2072-2077.
10. Hall-Craggs M, Allen CM, Owens CM, et al. MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology 1993; 189:423-427.
11. Lee MG, Lee HJ, Kim MH, et al. Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1997; 202:663-669.
12. Regan F, Smith D, Khazan R, et al. MR cholangiography in biliary obstruction using half-Fourier acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:627-632.
13. Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M, Mentha G, de Peyer R, Terrier F. Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1997; 205:523-530.
14. Adamek HE, Albert J, Weitz M, et al. A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction. Gut 1998; 43:680-683.
15. Holzknecht N, Gauger J, Sackmann M, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1998; 206:657-664.
16. Barish MA, Soto JA. MR cholangiopancreatography: techniques and clinical applications. AJR 1997; 169:1295-1303.
17. Metz CE. ROCKIT 0.9B [software]. 1998. Available at: http://wwwv-radiology.uchicago .edu/krl/toppage11.htm. Accessed January 9, 1999.
18. Ernst O, Calvo M, Sergent G, Mizrahi D, Carpentier F. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography using a HASTE sequence: comparison of single-slice and multislice acquisition techniques. AJR 1997; 169: 1304-1306.
19. Camus C, Taourel P, Calvet C, Bruel JM. Differentiating stones from tumors of the biliary tree: a new challenge for MR cholangiography? AJR 1998; 170:511-512.
20. Reinhold C, Bret PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR 1996; 166:1285-1295.
21. Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preoperative assessment with helical CT versus dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 202:655-662.
22. Sironi S, De Cobelli F, Zerhi A, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: assessment of vascular invasion with high-field MR imaging and a phased-array coil. AJR 1996; 167:997-1001.
23. Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M, et al. Small pancreatic adenocarcinomas: efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement. Radiology 1994; 193:683-688.