Evolutionary experiments on mate recognition in the Drosophila serrata species complex

Genetica

Volumn 116, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 239-250

  Blows, Mark W ^a   Higgie, Megan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Drosophila birchii; Drosophila serrata; Genetic correlation; Genetic variance; Mate recognition; Natural selection; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VARIATION (GENETICS);

DROSOPHILA BIRCHII; DROSOPHILA SERRATA;

EID: 0036874099     PISSN: 00166707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021276224566     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Andersson, M., 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
2. Arnold, S.J., 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 140: S85-S107.
3. Arnold, S.J. & P.C. Phillips, 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. II. Coastal-inland divergence in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 53: 1516-1527.
4. Ayala, F.J., 1965. Sibling species of the Drosophila serrata group. Evolution 19: 538-545.
5. Bakker, T.C.M., 1993. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature 363: 255-257.
6. Barton, N., 2000. The rapid origin of reproductive isolation. Science 290: 462-463.
7. Barton, N.H. & M, Turelli, 1987. Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters. Genet. Res. 49: 157-173.
8. Blows, M.W., 1998. Evolution of a mate recognition system after hybridization between two Drosophila species. Am. Nat. 151: 538-544.
9. Blows, M.W., 1999. Evolution of the genetic covariance between male and female components of mate recognition: an experimental test. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 2169-2174.
10. Blows, M.W., 2002. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B269: 1113-1118.
11. Blows, M.W. & R.A. Allan, 1998. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 152: 826-837.
12. Blows, M.W. & M. Higgie. Genetic constraints on the evolution of evolution of mate recognition under natural selection. Am. Nat. (in press).
13. Bock, I.R., 1976. Drosophilidae of Australia. I. Drosophila (Insecta: Diptera). Aust. J. Zool., Supp, Ser. No. 40.
14. Bock, I.R., 1984. Interspecific hybridization in the genus Drosophila. Evol. Biol. 17: 41-70.
15. Breden, F., H.C. Gerhardt & R.K. Butlin, 1994. Female choice and genetic correlations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 343.
16. Brooks, R., 2000. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406: 67-70.
17. Brooks, R. & V. Couldridge, 1999. Multiple sexual ornaments coevolve with multiple mating preferences. Am. Nat. 154: 37-45.
18. Burger, R. & R. Lande, 1994. On the distribution of the mean and variance of a quantitative trait under mutation-selection-drift balance. Genetics 138: 901-912.
19. Butlin, R.K., G.M. Hewitt & S.F. Webb, 1985. Sexual selection for intermediate optimum in Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Anim. Behav. 33: 1281-1292.
20. Butlin, R., 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2: 8-13.
21. Butlin, R., 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation, pp. 158-179 in Speciation and Its Consequences, edited by D. Otte & J.A. Endler. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
22. Butlin, R., 1995. Reinforcement: an idea evolving. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 432-434.
23. Buckley, S.H., T. Tregenza & R.K. Butlin, 1997. Speciation and signal trait genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 299-301.
24. Carson, H.L., F.C. Val & A.R. Templeton, 1994. Change in male secondary sexual characters in artificial interspecific hybrid populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 6315-6318.
25. Cobb, M. & J.M. Jallon, 1990. Pheromones, mate recognition and courtship stimulation in the Drosophila melanogaster species sub-group. Anim. Behav. 39: 1058-1067.
26. Coyne, J.A., 1992. Genetics of speciation. Nature 355: 511-515.
27. Coyne, J.A., A.P. Crittenden & K. Mah, 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to sexual isolation in Drosophila. Science 265: 1461-1464.
28. Coyne, J.A. & B. Charlesworth, 1997. Genetics of a pheromone difference affecting sexual isolation between Drosophila mauritiana and D. sechellia. Genetics 145: 1015-1030.
29. Coyne, J.A. & H.A. Orr, 1998. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 287-305.
30. Dobzhansky, T., 1951. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York, 3rd edn.
31. Endler, J.A. & A.E. Houde, 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49: 456-468.
32. Gray, D.A. & W.H. Cade, 1999. Quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the field cricket Gryllus integer. Evolution 53: 848-854.
33. Gray, D.A. & W.H. Cade, 2000. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 14449-14454.
34. Harshman, L.G. & A.A. Hoffmann, 2000. Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 32-36.
35. Hasselquist, D., S. Bensch & T. von Schantz, 1996. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381: 229-232.
36. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth & M.W. Blows, 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290: 519-521.
37. Hine, E., S. Lachish, M. Higgie & M.W. Blows. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (in press).
38. Hoikkala, A. & S. Crossley, 2000. Copulatory courtship in Drosophila: behaviour and songs in D. birchii and D. serrata, J. Insect Behav. 13: 71-87.
39. Houde, A.E., 1994. Artificial selection on male colour patterns shifts mating preferences of female guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 256: 125-130.
40. Houle, D. & A.S. Kondrashov, 2002. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 97-104.
41. Howard, D.J., 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis, pp. 46-69 in Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process, edited by R.G. Harrison, Oxford University Press, New York.
42. Howard, R.W., L.L. Jackson, H. Banse & M.W. Blows. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila birchii and D. serrata: identification and role in mate choice in D. serrata. (in preparation).
43. Iwasa, Y., A. Pomiankowski & S. Nee, 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The "Handicap" principle. Evolution 45: 1431-1442.
44. Iwasa, Y. & A. Pomiankowski, 1995. Continual change in mate preferences. Nature 377: 420-422.
45. Jallon, J.M., 1984. A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav. Genet. 14: 441-478.
46. Jennions, M.D., A.P. Moller & M. Petrie, 2001. Sexually-selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis. Quart. Rev. Biol. 76: 3-36.
47. Keightley, P.D. & W.G. Hill, 1989. Quantitative genetic variability maintained by mutation-stabilizing selection: sampling variation and response to subsequent directional selection. Genet. Res. 54: 45-57.
48. Kirkpatrick, M., 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 43-70.
49. Kirkpatrick, M. & N.H. Barton, 1995. Deja vu all over again. Nature 377: 388-389.
50. Kirkpatrick, M. & N.H. Barton, 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 1282-1286.
51. Lande, R., 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402-416.
52. Lande, R., 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
53. Lynch, M. & B. Walsh, 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts.
54. Nelson, D.R., 1993. Methyl-branched lipids in insects, pp. 271-315 in Insect Lipids: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biology, edited by D.W. Stanley-Samuelson & D.R. Nelson. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
55. Noor, M.A., 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375: 674-675.
56. Norris, K., 1993. Heritable variation in a plumage indicator of viability in male great tits Parus major. Nature 362: 537-539.
57. Orr, H.A., 2001. The genetics of species differences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 343-350.
58. Partridge, L., 1980. Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit flies. Nature 283: 290-291.
59. Paterson, H.E.H., 1985. The recognition concept of species, pp. 21-29 in Species and Speciation, edited by E. Vrba. Transvaal Museum Monograph 4, Pretoria, South Africa.
60. Pomiankowski, A. & L. Sheridan, 1994. Linked sexiness and choosiness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 242-244.
61. Petrie, M., 1994. Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature 371: 598-599.
62. Rice, W.R. & E.E. Hostert, 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in forty years. Evolution 47: 1637-1653.
63. Rundle, H.D. & D. Schluter, 1998. Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52: 200-208.
64. Ryan, M.J. & A.S. Rand, 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647-657.
65. Schluter, D., 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42: 849-861.
66. Schluter, D., 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50: 1766-1774.
67. Schluter, D., 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 372-380.
68. Spieth, H.T. & J.M. Ringo, 1983. Mating behaviour and sexual isolation in Drosophila, pp. 223-284 in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3C, edited by M. Ashburner, H.L. Carson & J.N. Thompson. Academic Press, London.
69. Turelli, M., N.H. Barton & J.A. Coyne, 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 330-343.
70. Wallace, B., M.W. Timm & M.P.P. Strambi, 1983. The establishment of novel mate recognition systems in introgressive hybrid Drosophila populations. Evol. Biol. 16: 467-488.
71. Wilkinson, G.S. & P.R. Reillo, 1994. Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255: 1-6.
72. Wu, C.-I., H. Hollocher, D.J. Begun, C.F., Aquadro, Y. Xu & M.-L. Wu, 1995. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: a possible case of incipient speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 2519-2523.