Evolution of the genetic covariance between male and female components of mate recognition: An experimental test

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 266, Issue 1434, 1999, Pages 2169-2174

  Blows, Mark W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Genetic correlation; Hybridization; Mate recognition

Indexed keywords

COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; EVOLUTION; RECOGNITION; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSORTATIVE MATING; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PLEIOTROPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION;

ANIMALIA; DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA BIRCHII; DROSOPHILA SERRATA; DROSOPHILIDAE;

EID: 0033533941     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0904     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bakker, T. C. M. 1993 Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in stickle-backs. Nature 363, 255-257.
2. Bakker, T. C. M. & Pomiankowski, A. 1995 The genetic basis of mate recognition. J. Evol. Biol. 8, 129-171.
3. Blows, M. W. 1998 Evolution of a mate recognition system after hybridization between two Drosophila species. Am. Nat. 151, 538-544.
4. Blows, M. W. & Allan, R. A. 1998 Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 152, 826-837.
5. Boake, C. R. B. 1991 Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: genetic coupling and genetic correlations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 225-227.
6. Buckley, S. H., Tregenza, T. & Butlin, R. K. 1997 Speciation and signal trait genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 299-301.
7. Carson, H. L., Val, F. C. & Templeton, A. R. 1994 Change in male secondary sexual characters in artificial interspecific hybrid populations Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6315-6318.
8. Coyne, J. A. & Charlesworth, B. 1997 Genetics of a pheromone difference affecting sexual isolation between Drosophila mauritiana and D. sechellia. Genetics 145, 1015-1030.
9. Coyne, J. A., Crittenden, A. P. & Mah, K. 1994 Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265, 1461-1464.
10. Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. 1970 An introduction to population genetics theory. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Publishing Co.
11. Dicckmann, U. & Docbeli, M. 1999 On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400, 354-357.
12. Endler, J. A. & Houde, A. E. 1995 Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49, 456-468.
13. Falconer, D. S. 1981 Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edn. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific and Technical.
14. Fisher, R. A. 1930 The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
15. Goodnight, C. J. & Schwartz, J. M. 1997 A bootstrap comparison of genetic covariance matrices. Biometrics 53, 1026-1039.
16. Grossman, M. & Gall, G. A. E. 1968 Covariance analysis with unequal subclass numbers: component estimation in quantitative genetics. Biometrics 24, 49-59.
17. Heisler, I. L. 1994 Quantitative genetic models of the evolution of mating behaviour. In Quantitative genetic studies of behavioural evolution (ed. C. R. B. Boake), pp. 101-125. Unversity of Chicago Press.
18. Hollocher, H., Ting, C.-T., Pollack, F. & Wu, C.-I. 1997 Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: variation in mating preference and correlation between the sexes. Evolution 51, 1175-1181.
19. Houde, A. 1993 Evolution by sexual selection: what can population comparisons tell us? Am. Nat. 141, 796-803.
20. Iwasa, Y. & Pomiankowski, A. 1995 Continual change in mate preferences. Nature 377, 420-422.
21. Jallon, J. M. 1981 A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav. Genet. 14, 441-478.
22. Kirkpatrick, M. & Barton, N. H. 1997 The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1282-1286.
23. Kondrashov, A. S. & Kondrashov, F. A. 1999 Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400, 351-354.
24. Laude, R. 1981 Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721-3725.
25. Lande, R. 1984 The genetic correlation between characters maintained by selection, linkage and inbreeding. Genet. Res. 44, 309-320.
26. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998 Genetics and the analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
27. Manly, B. F. J. 1997 Randomizatian, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 2nd edn. London: Chapman & Hall.
28. Pomiankowski, A. & Sheridan, L. 1994 Linked sexiness and choosiness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 242-244.
29. Wallace, B., Timm, M. W. & Strambi, M. P. P. 1983 The establishment of novel mate recognition systems in introgressive hybrid Drosophila populations. Evol. Biol. 16, 467-488.