Relative efficiency of ambiguous vs. directly measured haplotype frequencies

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 426-443

  Schaid, Daniel J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

EM algorithm; Fisher's information; Linkage disequilibrium; Nuclear family

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MARKER; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; HYBRID CELL; MARKER GENE; MEASUREMENT; PEDIGREE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ALLELES; GENE FREQUENCY; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NUCLEAR FAMILY; PROBABILITY;

GENETTA; MARTES PENNANTI;

EID: 0036858594     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10184     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abecasis G, Noguchi E, Heinzmann A, Traherne J, Bhattacharyya S, Leaves N, Anderson G. 2001. Extent and distribution of linkagedisequilibrium in three genomic regions. Am J Hum Genet 68:191-7.
2. Bahadur RR. 1961. A representation of the joint distribution of responses to n dichotomous items. In: Solomon H, editor. Studies in Item Analysis and Prediction. Stanford: Stanford University Press. p 158-68.
3. Cardon L, Bell J. 2001. Association study designs for complex diseases. Nat Rev Genet 2:91-9.
4. Clark AG, Weiss KM, Nickerson DA, Taylor SL, Buchanan A, Stengard J, Salomaa V, Vartiainen E, Perola M, Boerwinkle E, Sing CF. 1998. Haplotype structure and population genetic inferences from nucleotide-sequence variation in human lipoprotein lipase. Am J Hum Genet 63:595-612.
5. Daly M, Rioux J, Schaffner S, Hudson T, Lander E. 2001. High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nat Genet 29:229-32.
6. Douglas J, Boehnke M, Gillanders E, Trent J, Gruber S. 2001. Experimentally-derived haplotypes substantially increase the efficiency of linkage disequilibrium studies. Nat Genet 28:361-4.
7. 2-adrenergic receptor haplotypes alter receptor expression and predict in vivo responsiveness. Proceed Nat Acad Sci USA 97:10483-8.
8. Excoffier L, Slatkin M. 1995. Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Mol Biol Evol 12:921-7.
9. Excoffier L, Slatkin M. 1998. Incorporating genotypes of relatives into a test of linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet. 62:171-80.
10. Goldstein D. 2001. Islands of linkage disequilibrium. Nat Genet 29:109-11.
11. Hawley ME, Kidd KK. 1995. HAPLO: A program using the EM algorithm to estimate the frequencies of multi-site haplotypes. J Hered 86:409-11.
12. Hodge S, Boehnke M, Spence M. 1999. Loss of information due to ambiguous haplotyping of SNPs. Nat Genet 21:360-2.
13. Hollox EJ, Poulter M, Zvarik M, Ferak V, Krause A, Jenkins T, Saha N, Kozlov AI, Swallow DM. 2001. Lactase haplotype diversity in the old world. Am J Hum Genet 68:160-72.
14. Huttley GA, Smith MW, Carrington M, O'Brien SJ. 1999. A scan for linkage disequilibrium across the human genome. Genetics 152:1711-22.
15. Jeffreys A, Kauppi L, Neumann R. 2001. Intensely punctate meiotic recombination in the class II region of the major histocompatibility complex. Nat Genet 29:217-22.
16. Johnson G, Esposito L, Barratt B, Smith A, Hewerd J, Gianfranco D, Hironori U, Cordell H. 2001. Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes. Nat Genet 29:233-7.
17. Long JC, Williams RC, Urbanek M. 1995. An E-M algorithm and testing strategy for multiple-locus haplotypes. Am J Hum Genet 56:799-10.
18. Louis T. 1982. Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc B 44:226-33.
19. Nordborg M. 2001. Coalescent thoery. In: Balding DJ, Bishop M, Cannings C, editors. Handbook of Statistical Genetics. New York: John Wiley & Sons. p 179-212.
20. Patil N, Berno AJ, Hinds DA, Barrett WA, Doshi JM, Hacker CR, Kautzer CR, Lee DH, Marjoribanks C, McDonough DP, Nguyen BTN, Norris MC, Sheehan JB, Shen N, Stern D, Stokowski RP, Thomas DJ, Trulson MO, Vyas KR, Frazer KA, Fodor SPA, Cox DR. 2001. Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by high-resolution scanning of human chromosome 21. Science 294:1719-23.
21. Rohde K, Fuerst R. 2001. Haplotyping and estimation of haplotype frequencies for closely linked biallelic multilocus genetic phenotypes including nuclear family information. Hum Mutat 17:289-95.
22. Schaid DJ, McDonnell S, Wang L, Cunningham J, Thibodeau S. 2002. Caution on pedigree haplotype inference with software that assumes linkage equilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 71.
23. Slatkin M, Excoffier L. 1996. Testing for linkage disequilibrium in genotypic data using the expectation-maximization alogrithm. Heredity 76:377-83.
24. Tavtigian S, Simard J, Teng D, Abtin V, Baumgard M, Beck A, Camp N, Carillo A, Chen Y, Dayananth P, Desrochers M. 2001. A candidate prostate cancer susceptibility gene at chromosome 17p. Nat Genet 27:172-80.
25. Weir B. 1996. Genetic Data Analysis II. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.