Strategy-proofness and population-monotonicity for house allocation problems

Journal of Mathematical Economics

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 329-339

  Ehlers, Lars ^a   Klaus, Bettina ^b   Pápai, Szilvia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Indivisible objects; Population monotonicity; Strategy proofness

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036845518     PISSN: 03044068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4068(02)00059-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abdulkadiroǧlu, A., Sönmez, T., 1998. Random serial dictatorship and the core from random endowments in house allocation problems. Econometrica 66, 689-701.
2. Abdulkadiroǧlu, A., Sönmez, T., 1999. House allocation with existing tenants. Journal of Economic Theory 88, 233-260.
3. Bogomolnaia, A., Moulin, H., 2001. A new solution to the random assignment problem. Journal of Economic Theory 100, 295-328.
4. Bogomolnaia, A., Moulin, H., 2002. A simple random assignment problem with a unique solution. Economic Theory 19, 298-317.
5. Crès, H., Moulin, H., 2001. Scheduling with opting out: improving upon random priority. Operations Research 49, 565-577.
6. Ehlers, L., 2002. Coalitional strategy-proof house allocation. Journal of Economic Theory 105 (2), 298-317.
7. Ergin, H..I., 2000. Consistency in house allocation problems. Journal of Mathematical Economics 34, 77-97.
8. Hylland, A., Zeckhauser, R., 1979. The efficient allocation of individuals to positions. Journal of Political Economy 87, 293-314.
9. Konishi, H., Quint, T., Wako, J., 2001. On the Shapley-Scarf economy: the case of multiple types of indivisible goods. Journal of Mathematical Economics 35, 1-15.
10. Ma, J., 1994. Strategy-proofness and the strict core in a market with indivisibilities. International Journal of Game Theory 23, 75-83.
11. Moulin, H., 1995. Cooperative Microeconomics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
12. Pápai, S., 2000. Strategy-proof assignment by hierarchical exchange. Econometrica 68, 1403-1433.
13. Roth, A.E., Postlewaite, A., 1977. Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods. Journal of Mathematical Economics 4, 131-137.
14. Shapley, L., Scarf, H., 1974. On cores and indivisibility. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1, 23-37.
15. Svensson, L.-G., 1994. Queue allocation of indivisible goods. Social Choice and Welfare 11, 323-330.
16. Svensson, L.-G., 1999. Strategy-proof allocation of indivisible goods. Social Choice and Welfare 16, 557-567.
17. Thomson, W., 1983. The fair division of a fixed supply among a growing population. Mathematics of Operations Research 8, 319-326.
18. Thomson, W., 1995. Population monotonic allocation rules. In: Barnett, W.A., Moulin, H., Salles, M., Schofield, N. (Eds.), Social Choice, Welfare and Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Wako, J., 1984. A note on the strong core of a market with indivisible goods. Journal of Mathematical Economics 13, 189-194.
20. Zhou, L., 1990. On a conjecture by Gale about one-sided matching problems. Journal of Economic Theory 52, 123-135.