Physical educators' judgments about inclusion: A new instrument for preservice teachers

Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 435-452

  Hodge, Samuel R ^a   Murata, Nathan M ^b   Kozub, Francis M ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; GROUP DYNAMICS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; MALE; MODEL; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSICAL EDUCATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TEACHER; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036793722     PISSN: 07365829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/apaq.19.4.435     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control from cognition to behavior. (pp. 11-19). Heidelberg: Springer.
2. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior Bristol, UK: Open University Press.
3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50, 179-211.
4. Ajzen, I (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27-58.
5. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (pp. 1-33). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
8. Allport, G.W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 802-827). Worchester, MA: Clark University Press.
9. Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 71(5), 319-342.
11. th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Antonak, R.F., & Livneh, H. (1988). The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities: Methods, psychometrics and scales. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
13. Archie, V.W., & Sherrill, C. (1989). Attitudes toward handicapped peers of mainstreamed and nonmainstreamed children in physical education. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 319-322.
14. Barnhart, C.L., & Barnhart, R.K. (Eds.). (1990). The world book dictionary. Chicago, IL: World Book, Inc.
15. Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285-301.
16. nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
17. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
18. DePauw, K.P., & Doll-Tepper, G. (2000). Toward progressive inclusion and acceptance: Myth or reality? The inclusion debate and bandwagon discourse. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 135-143.
19. Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (Eds.). (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
20. Folsom-Meek, S.L., Nearing, R.J., Groteluschen, W., & Krampf, H. (1999). Effects of academic major, gender, and hands-on experience on attitudes of preservice teachers. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 389-402.
21. Folsom-Meek, S.L., Nearing, R.J., & Kalakian, L.H. (2000). Effects of an adapted physical education course in changing attitudes. Clinical Kinesiology, 54(3), 52-58.
22. Folsom-Meek, S.L., & Rizzo, T.L. (2002). Validating the physical educators' attitude toward teaching individuals with disabilities III (PEATID III) survey for future professionals. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 141-154.
23. Giner-Sorolla, R. (1999). Affect in attitude: Immediate and deliberative perspectives. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 441-461). New York: Guilford.
24. Hair, Jr. J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th. ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Heikinaro-Johansson, P., & Sherrill, C. (1994). Integrating children with special needs in physical education: A school district assessment model from Finland. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 44-56.
26. Hodge, S.R. (1998). Prospective physical education teachers' attitudes toward teaching students with disabilities. Physical Educator, 55(2), 68-77.
27. Hodge, S.R., & Jansma, P. (1998). Attitude change of physical education preservice teachers toward teaching students with varied disability types. Clinical Kinesiology, 51(4), 72-79.
28. Hodge, S.R., & Jansma, P. (1999). Effects of contact time and location of practicum experiences on attitudes of physical education preservice teachers. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 48-63.
29. Hodge, S.R., & Jansma, P. (2000). Physical education majors' attitudes toward teaching students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23(3), 211-224.
30. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-17, Sec. 601, 111 Stat. 40-41 (June 4, 1997).
31. Kiesler, C.A., Collins, B.E., & Miller, N. (1969). Attitude change: A critical analysis of theoretical approaches. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
32. Kowalski, E.M., & Rizzo, T.L. (1996). Factors influencing preservice student attitudes toward individuals with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13(2), 180-196.
33. Kudláèek, M., Válková, H., Sherrill, C., Myers, B., & French, R. (2002). An inclusion instrument based on planned behavior theory for prospective physical educators. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 280-299.
34. Murata, N.M., Hodge, S.R., & Little, J.R. (2000). Students' attitudes, experiences, and perspectives on their peers with disabilities. Clinical Kinesiology, 54(3), 59-66.
35. nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36. Pehazur, E.J., & Schemelkin, L.P. (1991). Measurement design and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Rizzo, T.L. (1984a). Attitudes of physical educators toward teaching handicapped pupils. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 1, 267-274.
38. Rizzo, T.L. (1984b). Physical educators' attitude toward teaching the handicapped. Unpublished survey. San Bernardino, CA: California State University.
39. Rizzo, T.L. (1986). Physical educators' attitude toward teaching the handicapped-II. Unpublished survey. San Bernardino, CA: California State University.
40. Rizzo, T.L. (1988). Validation of the physical educators' attitude toward teaching handicapped students survey. In L. Bain (Ed.),Abstracts of research papers 1988 (p. 248). Reston, VA: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance.
41. Rizzo, T.L. (1993a). The physical educators' attitude toward teaching individuals with disabilities-III survey. Unpublished survey. San Bernardino, CA: California State University.
42. Rizzo, T.L. (1993b). The physical educators' attitude toward teaching individuals with disabilities-III survey (preservice revision). Unpublished survey. San Bernardino, CA: California State University.
43. Rizzo, T.L., & Kirkendall, D.R. (1995). Teaching students with mild disabilities: What affects attitudes of future physical educators? Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 205-216.
44. Rizzo, T.L., & Vispoel, W.P. (1992). Changing attitudes about teaching students with handicaps. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 54-63.
45. Rizzo, T.L., & Wright, R.G. (1987). Secondary school physical educators' attitudes toward teaching students with handicaps. American Corrective Therapy Journal, 41, 52-55.
46. Rizzo, T.L., & Wright, R.G. (1988). Physical educators' attitudes toward teaching students with handicaps. Mental Retardation, 26, 307-309.
47. Schleien, S.J., Meyer, L.H., Heyne, L.A., & Brandt, B.B. (1995). Lifelong leisure skills and lifestyles for persons with developmental disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
48. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C.I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49. Sherif, C.W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R.E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
50. th ed.). Dubuque, IA: WCB/McGraw-Hill.
51. Slininger, D., Sherrill, C., & Jankowski, C.M. (2000). Children's attitudes toward peers with severe disabilities: Revisiting contact theory. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 176-196.
52. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. Theodorakis, Y., Bagiatis, K., & Goudas, M. (1995). Attitudes toward teaching individuals with disabilities: Application of planned behavior theory. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 151-160.
55. Tripp, A., French, R., & Sherrill, C. (1995). Contact theory and attitudes of children in physical education programs toward peers with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12(4), 323-332.
56. Tripp, A., & Sherrill, C. (1991). Attitude theories of relevance to adapted physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 8, 12-27.
57. Yun, J., & Ulrich, D.A. (2002). Estimating measurement validity: A tutorial. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 32-47.