Toward progressive inclusion and acceptance: Myth or reality? The inclusion debate and bandwagon discourse

Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 135-143

  DePauw, Karen P ^a   Doll Tepper, Gudrun ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISABILITY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; INTEGRATION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL EDUCATION;

EID: 0034001084     PISSN: 07365829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/apaq.17.2.135     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American Association for Heath, Physical Education & Recreation (1952). Guiding principles for adapted physical education. Journal of Health, Physical Education, & Recreation, 23, 15.
2. Beaver, D. (1999). Editor's Note. Did we jump on the wrong bandwagon? Problems with inclusion in physical education. Palaestra, 15, 31.
3. Bennett, R.S. (1995). Realists, radicals, and rainbows. Quest, 47, 115-130.
4. Block, M.E. (1994). Why all students with disabilities should be included in regular physical education. Palaestra, 10, 17-24.
5. Block, M.E. (1999). Did we jump on the wrong bandwagon? Problems with inclusion in physical education. Palaestra, 15, 30-36, 55-56.
6. Craft, D. (1994). Inclusion: Physical education for all. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 62, 54-56.
7. Condeluci, A. (1996). Beyond difference. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.
8. Datillo, J. (1994). Inclusive leisure services: Responding to the rights of persons with disabilities. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
9. Davis, L.J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. New York, NY: Verso.
10. DePauw, K.P. (1997). Inclusive physical activity, meaningful movement, and the third millennium. In Physical activity from the culture and life quality perspectives, (pp. 33-44), Rio de Janeiro: University of Gama Filho.
11. DePauw, K.P. (1999). Social-cultural context of disability: Implications for professional preparation and scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the American Academy of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Callaway Gardens, GA.
12. DePauw, K.P. (1986). Toward progressive inclusion and acceptance: Implications for physical education, Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 3, 1-6.
13. DePauw, K.P., & Doll-Tepper, G. (1989). European perspectives on adapted physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 6, 95-99.
14. DePauw, K.P. & Sherrill, C. (1994). Adapted physical activity: Present and future. Physical Education Review, 17, 6-13.
15. DePauw, K.P., & Goc Karp, G. (1994). Integrating knowledge of disability throughout the physical education curriculum: An infusion approach. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 3-13.
16. Doll-Tepper, G. (1996). Integrative ansatze im schul-und freizeitsport von menschen mit behinderungen [Inclusive approaches to physical education and recreation of persons with a disability]. In H. Eberwein (Ed.), Einfuhrung in die integrationspadogogik [An introduction into inclusive education]. Weinheim, Germany: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
17. Doll-Tepper, G., Dahms, C., Doll, B., & VonSelzam, H. (Eds). (1990). Adapted physical activity: An interdisciplinary approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag
18. Doll-Tepper, G., & DePauw, K.P. (1996). Theory and practice of adapted physical activity: Research perspectives. Sport Science Review, 5, 1-11.
19. Dunn, J.M., & Craft, D.H. (1985). Mainstreaming theory and practice. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2, 273-276.
20. Kozub, F.M, Sherblom, P.R., & Perry, T.L. (1999). Inclusion paradigms and perspectives: A stepping stone to accepting learner diversity in physical education. Quest, 51, 346-354.
21. Krostoski, D.M., Nosek, M.A., & Turk, M.A. (Eds). (1996). Women in physical disabilities: Achieving and maintaining health and well-being. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
22. LaMaster, K., Gall, K., Kinchin, G., & Siedentop, D. (1998). Inclusion practices of effective elementary specialists. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 64-81.
23. Poretta, D.L., Nesbitt, J., & Labanowich, S. (1993). Terminology usage: A case for clarity. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 10, 87-96.
24. Rimmer, J. H. (1999). Health promotion for people with disabilities: The emerging paradigm shift from disability prevention to prevention of secondary conditions, Physical Therapy, 79, 495-502.
25. Rizzo, T.L., Broadhead, G.D., & Kowalski, E. (1997). Changing kinesiology and physical education by infusing information about individuals with disabilities. Quest, 49, 229-237.
26. Shapiro, J. (1993). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Times Books.
27. Sherrill, C. (1976). Adapted physical education and recreation: A multidisciplinary approach. Dubuque, IA: Wm C. Brown.
28. th edition). Boston, MA: WCB/McGraw Hill.
29. Sherrill, C. (1994). Least restrictive environments and total inclusion philosophies: Critical analysis. Palaestra, 10, 25-28, 31, 34-35, 52-54.
30. Sherrill, C. & DePauw, K.P. (1997). History of adapted physical activity and education. In J.D. Massengale & R.A. Swanson (Eds). History of Exercise and Sport Science (pp. 39-108). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
31. Shogan, D. (1998). The social construction of disability: The impact of statistics and Technology. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 269-277.
32. Silverman, S.J., & Ennis, C.D. (1996). Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.