Fractionating the neglected space: The relevance of reference frames for defining left and right in spatial neglect

Cortex

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 465-477

  McCarthy, Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY POSITION; COGNITION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEFT HANDEDNESS; LOCOMOTION; NONHUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL NEGLECT; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULATION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

EID: 0036759611     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70016-9     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Anderson B. Pieces of the true crossover effect in neglect. Neuropsychology, 49: 809-812, 1997.
2. Barbieri C and De Renzi E. Patterns of neglect dissociation. Behavioural Neurology, 2: 13-24, 1989.
3. Beaton A and McCarthy M. Auditory neglect after right frontal lobe and right pulvinar lesions: Comments on Hugdahl, Wester, and Asbjornsen (1991) and some preliminary findings. Brain and Language, 44: 121-126, 1993.
4. Beaton A and McCarthy M. On the nature of auditory neglect: A reply to Hugdahl and Wester. Brain and Language, 48: 351-358, 1995.
5. Behrmann M and Moskovitch M. Object centred neglect in patients with unilateral neglect: Effects of left right coordinates of objects. Cognitive Neuroscience, 6: 1-16, 1994.
6. Behrmann M and Tipper SP. Object-based attentional mechanisms: Evidence from patients with unilateral neglect. In C Umiltà and M Moscovitch (Eds), Attention and Performance XV. Conscious and nonconscious processing and cognitive functioning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994, pp. 351-375.
7. Behrmann M and Tipper SP. Attention accesses multiple reference frames: Evidence from visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25: 83-101, 1999.
8. Berti A and Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12: 415-420, 2000.
9. Berti A and Rizzolatti G. Visual processing without awareness: Evidence from unilateral neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4: 345-351, 1992.
10. Berti A, Smania N and Allport A. Coding of far and near space in neglect patients. NeuroImage, 14: S98-S102, 2001.
11. Bryant DJ. Frames of reference in the spatial representation system. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 16: 241-242, 1993.
12. Calvanio R, Petrone PN and Levine DN. Left visual spatial neglect is both environment-centred and body-centred and body-centred. Neurology, 37: 1179-1183, 1987.
13. Caramazza A and Hillis AE. Levels of representation, co-ordinate frames, and unilateral neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7: 391-445, 1990.
14. Chatterjee A. Cross-over, completion and confabulation in unilateral spatial neglect. Brain, 118: 455-465, 1995.
15. Chokron S and Imbert M. Influence of reading habits on line bisection. Cognitive Brain Research, 1: 219-222, 1993.
16. Corballis MC. Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95: 115-123, 1988.
17. Corbetta M, Miezin F, Shulman G and Peterson S. A PET study of visuospatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 13: 1202-1226, 1993.
18. Corbetta M and Shulman GL. Human cortical mechanisms of visual attention during orienting and search. In GW Humphreys, J Duncan and A Treisman (Eds), Attention space and action. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999, Ch 11, pp. 183-198.
19. Cowey A, Small M and Ellis S. Visuospatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia, 32: 1059-1066, 1994.
20. Cowey A, Small M and Ellis S. No abrupt change in visual hemineglect from near to far space. Neuropsychologia, 37: 1-6, 1999.
21. Cubelli R and Speri V. Naming rotated pictures and the riddle of object-centred neglect. Cortex, 37: 159-174, 2001.
22. De Caro SA and Reeves A. Rotating objects to determine orientation, not identity: Evidence from a backward-masking/dual-task procedure. Perception and Psychophysics, 62: 1356-1366, 2000.
23. Driver J. The neuropsychology of spatial attention. In H Pashler (Ed), Attention. Hove: Psychology Press, 1998, Ch 8, pp. 297-335.
24. Driver J and Halligan PW. Can visual neglect operate in object-centred co-ordinates? An affirmative single case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8: 475-496, 1991.
25. Drive J and Pouget A. Object-centred visual neglect, or relative egocentric neglect? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12: 542-545, 2000.
26. Driver J and Spence C. Cross-modal links in spatial attention. In GW Humphreys, J Duncan and A Treisman (Eds), Attention Space and Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999, Ch 8, pp. 130-149.
27. Egeth HE and Yantis S. Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48: 269-297, 1997.
28. Egly R, Driver J and Rafal RD. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123: 161-177, 1994.
29. Eriksen CW and Schultz DW. Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics, 25: 249-263, 1979.
30. Farah MJ and Hammond KM. Mental rotation and orientation-invariant object recognition: Dissociable processes. Cognition, 29: 29-46, 1988.
31. Halligan PW and Marshall JC. How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex, 24: 321-328, 1988.
32. Halligan PW and Marshall JC. Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350: 498-500, 1991.
33. Halligan PW and Marshall JC. The bisection of horizontal and radial lines: A case-study of normal controls and 10 patients with left visuospatial neglect. International Journal of Neuroscience, 70: 149-167, 1993.
34. Hamm JP and McMullen PA. Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24: 413-426, 1998.
35. Harvey M, Milner AD and Roberts RC. Spatial bias in visually-guided reaching and bisection following right cerebral stroke. Cortex, 30: 343-350, 1994.
36. Heilman K, Bowers D and Shelton P. Attention to near and far space: The third dichotomy. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 13: 552-553, 1990.
37. Heilman K and Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5: 166-170, 1979.
38. Hillis AE, Mordkoff, JT and Caramazza A. Mechanisms of spatial attention revealed by hemispatial neglect. Cortex, 35: 433-442, 1999.
39. Humphreys GW and Riddoch MJ. Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: Evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11: 283-312, 1995.
40. Inhoff AW, Rafal R and Posner MJ. Bimodal extinction without cross-modal extinction. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 55: 26-39, 1992.
41. Jewell G and McCourt ME. Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38: 93-110, 2000.
42. Jolicoeur P. The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory and Cognition, 13: 289-303, 1985.
43. Jolicoeur P. Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16: 351-364, 1990.
44. Jolicoeur P and Milliken B. Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15: 200-210, 1989.
45. Kinsbourne M. In M Jeannerod (Ed), Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Aspects of Spatial Neglect. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1987, pp. 69-86.
46. Ladavas E. Is the right hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal lobe damage associated with retinal or gravitational co-ordinates? Brain, 110: 167-180, 1987.
47. Laeng B, Butchel MA and Butter CM. Tactile rod bisection: Hemispheric activation and sex differences. Neuropsychologia, 34: 1115-1121, 1996.
48. Laeng B, Brennen T, Johannessen K and Elvestad R. Multiple references frames in neglect? An investigation of the object-centred frame and the dissociation between "near" and "far" from the body by use of a mirror. Cortex, 38: 511-528, 2002.
49. Manning L, Halligan PW and Marshall JC. Individual variation in line bisection: A study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 28: 647-655, 1990.
50. Marshall JC and Halligan PW. Blindsight and insight in visuo-spatial neglect. Nature, 336: 766-767, 1988.
51. Marshall JC and Halligan PW. When right goes left: An investigation of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex, 25: 503-515, 1989.
52. Marshall JC and Halligan PW. Visuo-spatial neglect: A copying test to assess perceptual parsing. Journal of Neurology, 240: 37-40, 1993.
53. McCarthy M. Unilateral Neglect: A Review: In JG Beaumont, PM Kenealy, and MJC Rogers (Eds). Blackwell Dictionary of Neuropsychology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996, pp. 511-519.
54. McCourt ME and Jewell G. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 37: 843-855, 1999.
55. McCourt ME, Mark VW, Radonovich KJ, Willison SK and Freeman P. The effects of gender, menstrual phase and practice on the perceived location of the midsagittal plane. Neuropsychologia, 35: 717-724, 1997.
56. Posner MI. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Neuropsychology, 32: 3-25, 1980.
57. Posner M and Petersen SE. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13: 25-42, 1990.
58. Previc FH. Functional specialisation in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 13: 519-575, 1990.
59. Rafal RD. Neglect. In R Parasuraman (Ed), The Attentive Brain. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1998, Ch 22, pp. 489-525.
60. Rizzolatti G and Gallese V. Mechanisms and theories of spatial neglect. In F Boller and J Grafman (Eds), Handbook of Neuropsychology Vol 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988, pp. 223-249.
61. Rizzolatti G, Matelli M and Pavesi G. Deficits in attention and movement following the removal of postarcuate (area 6) and prearcuate (area 8) cortex in macaque monkeys. Brain, 106: 655-673, 1983.
62. Scarisbrick DJ, Tweedy JR and Kuslansky G. Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection. Neuropsychologia, 25: 695-699, 1987.
63. Shelton PA, Bowers, D and Heilman KM. Peripersonal and vertical neglect. Brain, 113: 191-205, 1990.
64. Tegner R, Caneman G and Levander M. Apparent right neglect in patients with left visual neglect. Cortex, 26: 455-458, 1990.
65. Tegner R and Levander M. The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 54: 882-887, 1991.
66. Tipper SP and Behrmann M. Object-centred not scene-based visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22: 1621-1278, 1996.
67. Turnbull OH, Beschin N and Della Sala S. Agnosia for object orientation: implications for theories of object recognition. Neuropsychologia, 35: 153-163, 1997.
68. Turnbull OH, Laws KR and McCarthy RA. Object recognition without knowledge of object orientation. Cortex, 31: 387-395, 1995.
69. Umiltà C. Mechanisms of attention. In B Rapp (Ed), Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 2001, pp. 135-158.
70. Vannucci M and Viggiano MP. Category effects on the processing of plane-rotated objects. Perception, 29: 276-30, 2000.
71. Varnava A, McCarthy M and Beaumont GB. Line bisection in normal adults: Direction of attentional bias for near and far space. Neuropsychologia, 40: 1372-1378, 2002.
72. Vuilleumier P, Valenza N, Mayer E, Reverdin A and Landis T. Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 43: 406-410, 1998.
73. Ward R. Interactions between perception and action systems: A model for selective selection. In GW Humphreys, J Duncan and A Treisman (Eds), Attention Space and Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999, Ch 18, pp. 311-332.
74. Weiss PH, Marshall JC, Wunderlich G, Tellmann L, Halligan PW, Freund HJ, Zilles K and Fink GR. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: A physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain, 123: 2531-2541, 2000.
75. Werth R and Poppel E. Compression and lateral shift of mental coordinate systems in a line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 26: 741-745, 1988.