Multiple reference frames in neglect? An investigation of the object-centred frame and the dissociation between "near" and "far" from the body by use of a mirror

Cortex

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 511-528

  Laeng, Bruno ^a   Brennen, Tim ^a   Johannessen, Kristin ^a   Holmen, Kirsti ^a   Elvestad, Rolf ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^b Regional Hospital of Tromso   (Norway)

Author keywords

Hemianopia; Mirror; Peripersonal space; Reference frames object centred neglect; Spatial neglect

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE NEGLECT; HEMIPARESIS; HOMONYMOUS HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; LEFT HEMISPHERE NEGLECT; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OBJECT CENTRED NEGLECT; PERCEPTION DISORDER; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SPATIAL OBJECT; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0036758580     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70020-0     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Behrmann M and Tipper SP. Object-based attentional mechanism's: Evidence from patients with unilateral neglect. In C Umiltà and M Moscovitch (Eds), Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994, pp. 351-375.
2. Behrmann M and Tipper SP. Attention accesses multiple reference frames: Evidence from visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25: 83-101, 1999.
3. Behrmann M, Watt S, Black SE and Barton JJ. Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: An oculographic analysis. Neuropsychologia, 35: 1445-1458, 1997.
4. Berti A and Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: Remapping space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12: 415-420, 2000.
5. Bisiach E, Capitani E, Luzzatti C and Perani D. Brain and conscious representation of outside reality. Neuropsychologia, 19: 543-551, 1979.
6. Bruce CJ and Goldberg ME. Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades. Journal of Neurophysiology, 53: 603-635, 1985.
7. Butter CM, Evans J, Kirsch N and Kewman D. Altitudinal neglect following traumatic brain injury: A case report. Cortex, 25: 135-146, 1989.
8. Caramazza A and Hillis AE. Internal spatial representations of written words: Evidence from unilateral neglect. Nature, 346: 267-269, 1990a.
9. Caramazza A and Hillis AE. Levels of representations, co-ordinate frames, and unilateral neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7: 391, 1990b.
10. Chatterjee A, Thompson KA and Ricci R. Quantitative analysis of cancellation tasks in neglect. Cortex, 35: 253-262, 1999.
11. Corbetta M, Miezen FM, Schulman GL and Petersen SE. A PET study of visuospatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 13: 1202-1226.
12. Cowey A, Small M and Ellis S. Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia, 32: 1059-1066.
13. Cowey A, Small M and Ellis S. No abrupt change in visual hemineglect from near to far space. Neuropsychologia, 37: 1-6, 1999.
14. Driver J and Baylis GC. Attention and visual object segmentation. In R Parasuraman (Ed), The Attentive Brain. 1998, Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 299-326.
15. Driver J and Halligan PW. Can visual neglect operate in object-centred co-ordinates? An affirmative single-case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8: 475-496, 1991.
16. Duncan J, Bundesen C, Olson A, Humphreys G, Charda S and Shibuya H. Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. Journal of Experiments Psychology: General, 450-478, 1999.
17. Gregory R. Mirrors in Mind. Freeman and Company, 1997.
18. Halligan PW and Marshall JC. Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350: 498-500, 1991.
19. Halligan PW and Marshall JC. Lateral and radial neglect as a function of spatial position: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 33: 1697-1702, 1995.
20. Halligan PW and Marshall JC. Neglect of awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 7: 356-380, 1998.
21. Heilman KM, Watson RT and Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders. In KM Heilman and E Valenstein (Eds), Clinical Neuropsychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993 Ch. 10, pp. 243-293.
22. Laeng B, Chabris CF and Kosslyn SM. Asymmetries in encoding spatial relations. In R Davidson and K Hugdahl (Eds), Brain Asymmetry (2nd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press, in press.
23. Landau B and Jackendoff R. "What" and "where" in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16: 217-265, 1993.
24. Pitzalis S, Spinelli D and Zoccolotti P. Vertical neglect: Behavioral and electrophysiological data. Cortex, 33: 679-688, 1997.
25. Posner MI and Raichle ME. Mages of Mind. New York: Scientific American Library, 1997.
26. Posner MI, Walker JA, Friedrich FJ and Rafal RD. Effects of parietal injury on covert orientation of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4: 1863-1874, 1984.
27. Posner MI, Walker JA, Friedrich FJ and Rafal RD. How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? Neuropsychologia, 25: 235-245, 1987.
28. Rafal RD. Neglect. In R Parasuraman (Ed), The Attentive Brain. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1998, Ch. 22, pp. 489-525.
29. Rapcsak SZ, Cimino CR and Heilman KM. Altitudinal neglect. Neurology, 38: 277-81; 1988.
30. Rizzolatti G and Gallese V. Mechanisms and theories of spatial neglect. In F Boller and J Grafman (Eds), Handbook of Neuropsychology, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988, pp. 223-249.
31. Shepard RN and Hurwitz S. Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. In S. Pinker (Ed), Visual Cognition. The MIT Press, 1985, Ch. 4, pp. 161-193.
32. Tipper SP and Behrmann M. Object-centred not scene-based visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22: 1261-1278, 1996.
33. Vallar G. Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2: 87-97, 1998.
34. Ward R. Interactions between perception and action systems: A model for selective selection. In GW Humphreys, J Duncan and A Treisman (Eds), Attention, Space and Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999, Ch. 18, 311-332.
35. Weintraub S and Mesulam M.-M. Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention: Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect. Archives of Neurology, 44: 624-625; 1987.