Genetic divergence within the Drosophila mayaguana subcluster, a closely related triad of Caribbean species in the repleta species group

Hereditas

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 240-246

  O'Grady, P M ^a   Durando, C M ^a,b   Heed, W B ^c   Wasserman, M ^b   Etges, W ^d   Desalle, R ^a  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c University of Arizona   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE; DNA;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; AT RICH SEQUENCE; CELL NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA; EGG LAYING; EVOLUTION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; MITOCHONDRION; MOLECULAR ECOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PARAPHYLY; PHYLOGENETIC TREE CONSTRUCTION METHOD; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPECIES COMPARISON; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; TAXON;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MAYAGUANA; DROSOPHILA PARISIENA; DROSOPHILA REPLETA; DROSOPHILA STRAUBAE;

EID: 0036758710     PISSN: 00180661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1601-5223.2002.t01-1-1360310.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baker R and DeSalle R, (1997). Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46: 654-673.
2. Bettler D, Pearson S and Yedvobnick B, (1996). The nuclear protein encoded by the Drosophilia neurogenic gene mastermid is widely expressed and associates with specific chromosomal regions. Genetics 143: 859-875.
3. Bremer K, (1988). The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
4. Brower A and DeSalle R, (1994). Practical and theoretical considerations for choice of DNA sequence region in insert molecular systematics, with a short review of published studies using nuclear gene regions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 87: 702-716.
5. Davis JI and Nixon KC, (1992). Populations, genetic variation, and the delineation of phylogenetic species. Syst. Biol. 41: 421-435.
6. Durando CM, Baker RH, Etges WJ, Heed WB, Wasserman M and DeSalle R, (2000). Phylogenetic analysis of the repleta species group of the genus Drosophila using multiple sources of characters. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16: 296-307.
7. Eriksson T, (1998). Auto Decay ver. 4.0 (program distributed by the author).
8. Etges WJ, Armella MA, O'Grady PM and Heed WB, (2001). Two new species of Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the repleta group from Mexico. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 94: 16-20.
9. Excoffier L, Smouse PE and Quattro JM, (1992). Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: applications to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
10. Felsenstein J, (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
11. Felsenstein J, (1988). Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 22: 521-565.
12. Fournier D, Karch F, Bride JM, Hall LM, Berge JB and Spierer P, (1989). Drosophila melanogaster acetylcholinesterase gene. Structure, evolution and mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 210: 15-22.
13. Heed WB and Grimaldi DA, (1991). Revision of the morphocryptic, Caribbean mayaguana species subcluster in the Drosophila repleta group (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Am. Mus. Novit. 2999: 1-15.
14. Heed WB, Sanchez A, Armengol R, and Fontdevila A. (1990). Genetic differentiation among island populations and species of cactophilic Drosophila in the West Indies. In: Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila. (Barker, Starmer, and MacIntyre, eds.). Plenum Press, New York.
15. Lewis DL, Farr CL, Farquhar AL and Kaguni LS, (1994). Sequence, organization, and evolution of the A + T region of Drosophilia melanogaster mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11: 523-538.
16. Maddison DR, Swofford DL and Maddison WP, (1997). NEXUS: an extensible file format for systematic information. Syst. Biol. 46: 590-621.
17. Maddison WP and Maddison DR, (2000). MacClade, Version 4: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland Massachusetts.
18. Newfield SJ, Smoller DA and Yedvobnick B, (1991). Interspecific comparison of the unusually repetitive Drosophila locus mastermind. J. Mol. Evol. 32: 415-420.
19. Schneider S, Roessli D, and Excoffier L, (2000). Arlequin ver. 2.000. A software for population genetic data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
20. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H and Flook P, (1994). Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 87: 651-701.
21. Swofford DL, (2002). PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, Ver. 4.0 Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC.
22. Treier M, Pfeifle C and Tautz D, (1989). Comparison of the gap segmentation gene hunchback between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis reveals novel modes of evolutionary change. EMBO J. 8: 117-1525.
23. Wasserman M, (1982). The repleta species group. In: The genetics and biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3b, Ashburner, Carson and Thompson eds. Academic Press, NY.
24. Wasserman M, (1992). Cytological evolution of the Drosophila repleta species group, pp. 455-552. In C. B. Krimbas and J. R. Powell [eds.], Drosophila inversion polymorphism. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
25. Williams JA, Bell JB and Carroll SB, (1991). Control of Drosophila wing and haltere development by the nuclear vestigial gene product. Genes Dev. 5: 2481-2495.